Evaluation of different artificial intelligence applications in responding to regenerative endodontic procedures.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05424-5
Ece Ekmekci, Parla Meva Durmazpinar
{"title":"Evaluation of different artificial intelligence applications in responding to regenerative endodontic procedures.","authors":"Ece Ekmekci, Parla Meva Durmazpinar","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05424-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is revolutionizing the workflows of healthcare professionals, enabling faster and more accurate patient treatment. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of responses provided by different AI chatbots to questions that dentists might ask regarding regenerative endodontic treatment (RET), a procedure that shows promising biological healing potential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 23 questions related to RET procedures were developed based on the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) 2022 guidelines. These questions were presented to three platforms: Google Bard (Gemini), ChatGPT-4o, and ChatGPT-4 with a PDF plugin. The questions were asked three times a day over the course of 10 days by two different researchers. The responses obtained were categorized as correct, incorrect, or insufficient according to the guidelines, and the results were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,380 responses were collected from the three platforms. Statistical analysis revealed significant relationships between the responses given by the platforms during morning, noon, and evening sessions (p < 0.05). ChatGPT-4 with the PDF plugin had the highest correct response rate (98.1%), while Gemini depicted the lowest (48%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While ChatGPT-4o and Gemini offer promising results for regenerative endodontic clinical applications, they do not provide sufficient guidance. However, ChatGPT-4 with the PDF plugin could be a valuable tool for clinicians due to its high accuracy rate. Further research is needed to develop AI programs specifically designed for clinicians in the field of endodontics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11725189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05424-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is revolutionizing the workflows of healthcare professionals, enabling faster and more accurate patient treatment. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of responses provided by different AI chatbots to questions that dentists might ask regarding regenerative endodontic treatment (RET), a procedure that shows promising biological healing potential.

Methods: A total of 23 questions related to RET procedures were developed based on the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) 2022 guidelines. These questions were presented to three platforms: Google Bard (Gemini), ChatGPT-4o, and ChatGPT-4 with a PDF plugin. The questions were asked three times a day over the course of 10 days by two different researchers. The responses obtained were categorized as correct, incorrect, or insufficient according to the guidelines, and the results were statistically analyzed.

Results: A total of 1,380 responses were collected from the three platforms. Statistical analysis revealed significant relationships between the responses given by the platforms during morning, noon, and evening sessions (p < 0.05). ChatGPT-4 with the PDF plugin had the highest correct response rate (98.1%), while Gemini depicted the lowest (48%).

Conclusions: While ChatGPT-4o and Gemini offer promising results for regenerative endodontic clinical applications, they do not provide sufficient guidance. However, ChatGPT-4 with the PDF plugin could be a valuable tool for clinicians due to its high accuracy rate. Further research is needed to develop AI programs specifically designed for clinicians in the field of endodontics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
22 months follow-up of deep marginal acquisition with thermacut bur in management of deep subgingival interproximal carious lesions: a case report. Assessment of using transfer learning with different classifiers in hypodontia diagnosis. Outcome of Er, Cr:YSGG laser and antioxidant pretreatments on bonding quality to caries-induced dentin. Treatment of gingival recession with vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and advanced platelet-rich fibrin. Ankyloglossia and breastfeeding self-efficacy in newborns: a birth cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1