Methodological standards for comparative effectiveness research: considerations for evidentiary review for medicare drug price negotiation.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1080/14737167.2025.2453503
Riddhi Doshi, Victoria Divino, Luke Greenwalt, Mitchell DeKoven
{"title":"Methodological standards for comparative effectiveness research: considerations for evidentiary review for medicare drug price negotiation.","authors":"Riddhi Doshi, Victoria Divino, Luke Greenwalt, Mitchell DeKoven","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2453503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is expected to result in lower drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries in the United States (US). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the most recent draft guidance for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation (DPN) program in May 2024.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In August 2023, the list of 10 drugs selected for the DPN were published and the first round of negotiations are now complete. While the latest CMS guidance highlights the importance of considering study limitations, bias, uncertainty, and generalizability, there were scarce methodological guidelines provided for the comparative effectiveness research (CER) studies. We conducted searches on PubMed and reviewed resources from websites of regulatory authorities.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Broader domains of data quality, transparency and methodology including study design, outcomes assessment, bias, confounding and uncertainty should be considered when developing methodological guidelines for evidence submitted for DPN. There is opportunity to align with and leverage existing guidelines published by federal and non-federal organizations in the US and globally while customizing the new guidance based on the specific requirements of DPN, keeping in mind CMS's interest in specific populations as well as health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2453503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is expected to result in lower drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries in the United States (US). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the most recent draft guidance for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation (DPN) program in May 2024.

Areas covered: In August 2023, the list of 10 drugs selected for the DPN were published and the first round of negotiations are now complete. While the latest CMS guidance highlights the importance of considering study limitations, bias, uncertainty, and generalizability, there were scarce methodological guidelines provided for the comparative effectiveness research (CER) studies. We conducted searches on PubMed and reviewed resources from websites of regulatory authorities.

Expert opinion: Broader domains of data quality, transparency and methodology including study design, outcomes assessment, bias, confounding and uncertainty should be considered when developing methodological guidelines for evidence submitted for DPN. There is opportunity to align with and leverage existing guidelines published by federal and non-federal organizations in the US and globally while customizing the new guidance based on the specific requirements of DPN, keeping in mind CMS's interest in specific populations as well as health equity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
The Lebanese health economic evaluation guideline. A retrospective observational analysis of the real-world care pathway of people with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy in Italy. The short-term impact of copayment reductions for government subsidised medicines in Australia. Cost effectiveness of obstructive sleep apnea therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost utility studies. Methodological standards for comparative effectiveness research: considerations for evidentiary review for medicare drug price negotiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1