Katya Remy, Curtis L Cetrulo, Colby J Hyland, Riley Baker, Anna Reaman, Krishna Vyas, Lisa Gfrerer, William G Austen, Katherine H Carruthers
{"title":"Reshaping Our Understanding of Sensation and Pain Following Breast Reduction Surgery.","authors":"Katya Remy, Curtis L Cetrulo, Colby J Hyland, Riley Baker, Anna Reaman, Krishna Vyas, Lisa Gfrerer, William G Austen, Katherine H Carruthers","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the sensory and breast pain outcomes in inferior versus superomedial pedicle breast reduction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients undergoing the inferior pedicle technique were matched to 20 patients undergoing the superomedial pedicle technique based on age, BMI, and resection weight. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Monofilament testing was performed on the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and surrounding breast. Patient-reported outcomes included nipple and breast sensation (5-point Likert scale), pain intensity (0-10), and the Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Neuropathic Pain Quality scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the NAC, mean monofilament values and patient-reported sensation were significantly better in the inferior versus the superomedial pedicle group at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and comparable at 6 and 12 months (<i>P</i> > 0.05). At 12 months, 72.5% of patients reported complete (5 of 5) nipple sensation (77.5% inferior versus 67.5% superomedial, <i>P</i> > 0.05). At the breast, the mean monofilament values and patient-reported sensation were similar between pedicle groups throughout follow-up. At 12 months, 82.5% of the patients reported complete (5 of 5) breast sensation (85.0% inferior versus 80% superomedial, <i>P</i> > 0.05). Rates of postoperative breast pain were similar between groups throughout follow-up (<i>P</i> > 0.05). At 12 months, 25% of patients reported breast pain, with neuropathic qualities in 85% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inferior pedicle may allow for earlier restoration of quantitative and patient-reported NAC sensation, but long-term sensation is comparable between techniques. A quarter of patients reported persistent breast pain regardless of the pedicle type.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 1","pages":"e6427"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the sensory and breast pain outcomes in inferior versus superomedial pedicle breast reduction.
Methods: Twenty patients undergoing the inferior pedicle technique were matched to 20 patients undergoing the superomedial pedicle technique based on age, BMI, and resection weight. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Monofilament testing was performed on the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and surrounding breast. Patient-reported outcomes included nipple and breast sensation (5-point Likert scale), pain intensity (0-10), and the Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Neuropathic Pain Quality scale.
Results: At the NAC, mean monofilament values and patient-reported sensation were significantly better in the inferior versus the superomedial pedicle group at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05) and comparable at 6 and 12 months (P > 0.05). At 12 months, 72.5% of patients reported complete (5 of 5) nipple sensation (77.5% inferior versus 67.5% superomedial, P > 0.05). At the breast, the mean monofilament values and patient-reported sensation were similar between pedicle groups throughout follow-up. At 12 months, 82.5% of the patients reported complete (5 of 5) breast sensation (85.0% inferior versus 80% superomedial, P > 0.05). Rates of postoperative breast pain were similar between groups throughout follow-up (P > 0.05). At 12 months, 25% of patients reported breast pain, with neuropathic qualities in 85% of cases.
Conclusions: The inferior pedicle may allow for earlier restoration of quantitative and patient-reported NAC sensation, but long-term sensation is comparable between techniques. A quarter of patients reported persistent breast pain regardless of the pedicle type.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.