Faculty perceptions of a professional development program for developing CUREs and promoting inclusive and equitable teaching.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1128/jmbe.00215-24
Laura Gough, Rommel Miranda, Matthew Hemm, Leann Norman, Brian Jara
{"title":"Faculty perceptions of a professional development program for developing CUREs and promoting inclusive and equitable teaching.","authors":"Laura Gough, Rommel Miranda, Matthew Hemm, Leann Norman, Brian Jara","doi":"10.1128/jmbe.00215-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) model can be used to explore how faculty prioritize learning about and adopting new pedagogical approaches. Here, we use the DOI framework to contextualize biology faculty perceptions of a professional development (PD) program designed to help them create a full semester course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) class at a large, public comprehensive university. PD sessions included exploring self-reflexive identity while fostering inclusive classroom spaces through understanding and interrupting implicit bias and microaggressions. This qualitative study sought to determine 11 biology faculty members' beliefs about the influence of their year-long PD on their CURE development and teaching practices. Findings suggest that faculty were motivated to teach CUREs for a variety of reasons. A common incentive was integrating research into a CURE to bring their passion into their classroom and to engage more students in research. This may be particularly important at institutions where faculty have a heavy teaching load. Faculty also reported modifying their teaching in their CUREs and other courses to be more inclusive and equitable. The importance of peer interactions in the PD was emphasized repeatedly as faculty learned from experts, the literature, and faculty who had already developed a CURE. Our results illustrate that a community of practice structure can enhance the learning aspect of the community, helping faculty consider their implementation of inclusive, equitable, and high-impact practices as an ongoing educational process for themselves and emphasizing the importance of reflection and iteration in a DOI framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":46416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education","volume":" ","pages":"e0021524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00215-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Diffusion of Innovations (DOI) model can be used to explore how faculty prioritize learning about and adopting new pedagogical approaches. Here, we use the DOI framework to contextualize biology faculty perceptions of a professional development (PD) program designed to help them create a full semester course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) class at a large, public comprehensive university. PD sessions included exploring self-reflexive identity while fostering inclusive classroom spaces through understanding and interrupting implicit bias and microaggressions. This qualitative study sought to determine 11 biology faculty members' beliefs about the influence of their year-long PD on their CURE development and teaching practices. Findings suggest that faculty were motivated to teach CUREs for a variety of reasons. A common incentive was integrating research into a CURE to bring their passion into their classroom and to engage more students in research. This may be particularly important at institutions where faculty have a heavy teaching load. Faculty also reported modifying their teaching in their CUREs and other courses to be more inclusive and equitable. The importance of peer interactions in the PD was emphasized repeatedly as faculty learned from experts, the literature, and faculty who had already developed a CURE. Our results illustrate that a community of practice structure can enhance the learning aspect of the community, helping faculty consider their implementation of inclusive, equitable, and high-impact practices as an ongoing educational process for themselves and emphasizing the importance of reflection and iteration in a DOI framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师对专业发展计划的看法,以发展治愈和促进包容和公平的教学。
创新扩散(DOI)模型可用于探索教师如何优先学习和采用新的教学方法。在这里,我们使用DOI框架来背景化生物学教师对专业发展(PD)计划的看法,该计划旨在帮助他们在一所大型公立综合性大学创建一个完整学期的基于课程的本科研究经验(CURE)课程。PD课程包括探索自我反思身份,同时通过理解和打断内隐偏见和微侵犯来培养包容性的课堂空间。本定性研究旨在确定11名生物学教师对其一年的PD对其CURE开发和教学实践的影响的信念。研究结果表明,教师之所以愿意教授治愈方法,有多种原因。一个常见的动机是将研究与治疗结合起来,将他们的激情带入课堂,并吸引更多的学生参与研究。在教师教学负担沉重的机构中,这一点尤为重要。教师们还报告说,他们修改了自己的课程和其他课程的教学,使其更加包容和公平。在PD中同伴互动的重要性被反复强调,因为教师们从专家、文献和已经开发出CURE的教师那里学习。我们的研究结果表明,实践社区结构可以增强社区的学习方面,帮助教师将包容性、公平性和高影响力实践的实施视为对他们自己的持续教育过程,并强调在DOI框架中反思和迭代的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
26.30%
发文量
95
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Growing microbiology literacy through interdisciplinary approaches to food fermentations and an Indigenous peoples' rights framework. Erratum for Shahoy et al., "Undergraduate-level biology students' application of central dogma to understand COVID mRNA vaccines". Faculty rewards from course-based undergraduate research experiences (CURE) in biochemistry. A course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) embedded within a summer undergraduate research experience demonstrates value-added benefits. Faculty perceptions of a professional development program for developing CUREs and promoting inclusive and equitable teaching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1