Processing Incongruity for Mental Events in Comics: Contours of Character Inferences.

IF 2.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Metaphor and Symbol Pub Date : 2024-12-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10926488.2024.2417215
Bien Klomberg, Klavdiia Fadeeva, Joost Schilperoord, Neil Cohn
{"title":"Processing Incongruity for Mental Events in Comics: Contours of Character Inferences.","authors":"Bien Klomberg, Klavdiia Fadeeva, Joost Schilperoord, Neil Cohn","doi":"10.1080/10926488.2024.2417215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual narratives, like comics, at times show depictions of characters' imagination, dreams, or flashbacks, which seem incongruent with the ongoing primary narrative. Such \"domain constructions\" thus integrate an auxiliary domain (e.g. a dream) within the primary domain (the expected, physical storyworld), and may require readers to resolve seemingly non-co-referential figures as co-referential (e.g. when a character's dream shows that character as an animal). In three self-paced reading experiments, we investigate the processing and understanding of single vs. multiple domains in sequences with co-reference issues (Exp. 1) and whether graphic cues facilitate such domain switches (Exp. 2 and 3). Domain switches incurred greater updating costs but were comprehensible, with greater similarity across panels predicting faster processing, and comic reading experience affecting viewing times. The successful integration of fantasized agents which seem to lack co-reference implies that visual narrative comprehension goes beyond event and scene perception alone, but also involves proficiency in conventional constructions related to perspective-taking and inferencing.</p>","PeriodicalId":46492,"journal":{"name":"Metaphor and Symbol","volume":"40 1","pages":"51-75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11716651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metaphor and Symbol","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2024.2417215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual narratives, like comics, at times show depictions of characters' imagination, dreams, or flashbacks, which seem incongruent with the ongoing primary narrative. Such "domain constructions" thus integrate an auxiliary domain (e.g. a dream) within the primary domain (the expected, physical storyworld), and may require readers to resolve seemingly non-co-referential figures as co-referential (e.g. when a character's dream shows that character as an animal). In three self-paced reading experiments, we investigate the processing and understanding of single vs. multiple domains in sequences with co-reference issues (Exp. 1) and whether graphic cues facilitate such domain switches (Exp. 2 and 3). Domain switches incurred greater updating costs but were comprehensible, with greater similarity across panels predicting faster processing, and comic reading experience affecting viewing times. The successful integration of fantasized agents which seem to lack co-reference implies that visual narrative comprehension goes beyond event and scene perception alone, but also involves proficiency in conventional constructions related to perspective-taking and inferencing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
漫画中心理事件的处理不一致性:人物推理的轮廓。
像漫画一样,视觉叙事有时会表现出人物的想象、梦想或闪回,这似乎与正在进行的主要叙事不一致。这样的“域结构”将辅助域(如梦)整合到主域(预期的,真实的故事世界)中,并且可能要求读者将看似非共同指涉的人物分解为共同指涉(例如,当一个角色的梦显示该角色是动物时)。在三个自定节奏阅读实验中,我们研究了具有共同参考问题的序列中单域与多域的处理和理解(实验1),以及图形线索是否促进了这种领域切换(实验2和3)。领域切换需要更高的更新成本,但易于理解,面板之间的相似性越大,处理速度越快,漫画阅读体验影响观看时间。似乎缺乏共同参照的幻想主体的成功整合意味着视觉叙事理解不仅仅是对事件和场景的感知,还包括对与视角和推理相关的传统结构的熟练掌握。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Metaphor and Symbol: A Quarterly Journal is an innovative, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to the study of metaphor and other figurative devices in language (e.g., metonymy, irony) and other expressive forms (e.g., gesture and bodily actions, artworks, music, multimodal media). The journal is interested in original, empirical, and theoretical research that incorporates psychological experimental studies, linguistic and corpus linguistic studies, cross-cultural/linguistic comparisons, computational modeling, philosophical analyzes, and literary/artistic interpretations. A common theme connecting published work in the journal is the examination of the interface of figurative language and expression with cognitive, bodily, and cultural experience; hence, the journal''s international editorial board is composed of scholars and experts in the fields of psychology, linguistics, philosophy, computer science, literature, and media studies.
期刊最新文献
Processing Incongruity for Mental Events in Comics: Contours of Character Inferences. The Norwegian Dugnad in Times of COVID-19 Drawing as a Tool in Metaphor-Led Discourse Analysis Translating Motion Events Across Physical and Metaphorical Spaces in Structurally Similar Versus Structurally Different Languages The Influence of Metaphorical Framing on Emotions and Reasoning About the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1