Supportive Touch in Psychedelic Assisted Therapy.

IF 20.8 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS American Journal of Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1080/15265161.2024.2433428
Logan Neitzke-Spruill, Caroline Beit, Lynnette A Averill, Amy L McGuire
{"title":"Supportive Touch in Psychedelic Assisted Therapy.","authors":"Logan Neitzke-Spruill, Caroline Beit, Lynnette A Averill, Amy L McGuire","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2024.2433428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In August 2024, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration rejected Lykos Therapeutics, Inc.'s new drug application for midomafetamine with psychological intervention (MDMA-AT) to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Among the many issues raised during review was concern about a highly publicized case of alleged sexual misconduct by an unlicensed therapist during a Phase 2 study of MDMA and the potential risk of future abuse. This incident of misconduct, along with several other publicized cases of misconduct by guides, facilitators, and shaman offering psychedelic retreats, has raised the question of whether physical contact is ever appropriate during psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT). Drawing on research about supportive touch in other clinical contexts and taking into consideration features of psychedelics that exacerbate the potential for harm associated with supportive touch, we advocate for a precautionary approach to harm-reduction while arguing that supportive touch ought not be thrown out whole-cloth.</p>","PeriodicalId":50962,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Bioethics","volume":"25 1","pages":"29-39"},"PeriodicalIF":20.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2433428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In August 2024, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration rejected Lykos Therapeutics, Inc.'s new drug application for midomafetamine with psychological intervention (MDMA-AT) to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Among the many issues raised during review was concern about a highly publicized case of alleged sexual misconduct by an unlicensed therapist during a Phase 2 study of MDMA and the potential risk of future abuse. This incident of misconduct, along with several other publicized cases of misconduct by guides, facilitators, and shaman offering psychedelic retreats, has raised the question of whether physical contact is ever appropriate during psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT). Drawing on research about supportive touch in other clinical contexts and taking into consideration features of psychedelics that exacerbate the potential for harm associated with supportive touch, we advocate for a precautionary approach to harm-reduction while arguing that supportive touch ought not be thrown out whole-cloth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迷幻辅助治疗中的支持性接触。
2024年8月,美国食品和药物管理局(fda)拒绝了Lykos Therapeutics, Inc.的midomafetamine with psychological intervention (MDMA-AT)治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的新药申请。在审查期间提出的许多问题中,有一个被高度曝光的案例,即一名无证治疗师在MDMA的第二阶段研究中涉嫌性行为不端,以及未来滥用的潜在风险。这起不当行为事件,以及其他几起由导游、辅导员和提供迷幻静修的萨满所公开的不当行为,引发了一个问题,即在迷幻辅助治疗(PAT)期间,身体接触是否合适。根据其他临床环境中支持性接触的研究,并考虑到致幻剂的特点会加剧与支持性接触相关的潜在伤害,我们主张采取预防措施来减少伤害,同时认为支持性接触不应该被完全抛弃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Bioethics
American Journal of Bioethics 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB) is a renowned global publication focused on bioethics. It tackles pressing ethical challenges in the realm of health sciences. With a commitment to the original vision of bioethics, AJOB explores the social consequences of advancements in biomedicine. It sparks meaningful discussions that have proved invaluable to a wide range of professionals, including judges, senators, journalists, scholars, and educators. AJOB covers various areas of interest, such as the ethical implications of clinical research, ensuring access to healthcare services, and the responsible handling of medical records and data. The journal welcomes contributions in the form of target articles presenting original research, open peer commentaries facilitating a dialogue, book reviews, and responses to open peer commentaries. By presenting insightful and authoritative content, AJOB continues to shape the field of bioethics and engage diverse stakeholders in crucial conversations about the intersection of medicine, ethics, and society.
期刊最新文献
Do Reasons Matter? Navigating Parents' Reasons in Healthcare Decisions for Children. Substituted Judgment and The Paradigm Case Mistake. Breaching Confidentiality in Genetic and Non-Genetic Cases: Two Problematic Distinctions. Clinical Ethics Fellowship Programs in the U.S. and Canada: A Descriptive Study of Program Characteristics and Practices. The Uniform Determination of Death Act is Not Changing. Will Physicians Continue to Misdiagnose Brain Death?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1