Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain communications Pub Date : 2024-12-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae463
Shalom K Henderson, Siddharth Ramanan, Matthew A Rouse, Thomas E Cope, Ajay D Halai, Karalyn E Patterson, James B Rowe, Matthew A Lambon Ralph
{"title":"Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia.","authors":"Shalom K Henderson, Siddharth Ramanan, Matthew A Rouse, Thomas E Cope, Ajay D Halai, Karalyn E Patterson, James B Rowe, Matthew A Lambon Ralph","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated semantic cognition in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia, including (i) the status of verbal and non-verbal semantic performance; and (ii) whether the semantic deficit reflects impaired semantic control. Our <i>a priori</i> hypothesis that individuals with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia would exhibit semantic control impairments was motivated by the anatomical overlap between the temporoparietal atrophy typically associated with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia and lesions associated with post-stroke semantic aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia, which cause heteromodal semantic control impairments. We addressed the presence, type (semantic representation and semantic control; verbal and non-verbal), and progression of semantic deficits in logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia. Since most people with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia have Alzheimer's disease pathology and are part of a broader multi-dimensional phenotype space encompassing Alzheimer's disease sub-types, we compared semantic performance in logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia and typical amnestic Alzheimer's disease. Given the differences in lesion and atrophy patterns in semantic aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia versus semantic-dementia/semantic-variant primary progressive aphasia patients, our second aim was to examine atrophy patterns in people with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia and typical Alzheimer's disease compared to age-matched controls. Twenty-seven patients participated in the study. People were grouped into those meeting consensus criteria for logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (<i>N</i> = 10) and others who may have previously satisfied definitions of logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia but had progressed with multi-domain cognitive impairments (herein referred to as 'logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia+'; <i>N</i> = 8). People with typical amnestic Alzheimer's disease (<i>N</i> = 9) were relatively preserved across verbal and non-verbal semantic assessments. Logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia patients were impaired on both verbal and non-verbal semantic tasks and their impairments showed the hallmark characteristics of a semantic control deficit. Logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia and logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia + patients showed effects of varying semantic control demands, positive cueing effects, and correlated performance between semantic and executive tasks. Whole-brain voxel-based morphometry, comparing each of the patient groups to age-matched controls, revealed significantly reduced grey and white matter in the bilateral hippocampi and lateral temporal regions in typical Alzheimer's disease patients. The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia group exhibited an asymmetric pattern of reduced grey and white matter intensity in the language-dominant left hemisphere, including a significant portion of the lateral and medial temporal lobe. Logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia + patients demonstrated reduced grey and white matter in the left temporal lobe extending sub-cortically, anteriorly and posteriorly, as well as right temporal involvement. Our findings could aid diagnostic sub-typing of primary progressive aphasia by adopting semantic control features and offer improved clinical characterization of logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia in the trajectory of semantic decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 1","pages":"fcae463"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated semantic cognition in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia, including (i) the status of verbal and non-verbal semantic performance; and (ii) whether the semantic deficit reflects impaired semantic control. Our a priori hypothesis that individuals with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia would exhibit semantic control impairments was motivated by the anatomical overlap between the temporoparietal atrophy typically associated with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia and lesions associated with post-stroke semantic aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia, which cause heteromodal semantic control impairments. We addressed the presence, type (semantic representation and semantic control; verbal and non-verbal), and progression of semantic deficits in logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia. Since most people with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia have Alzheimer's disease pathology and are part of a broader multi-dimensional phenotype space encompassing Alzheimer's disease sub-types, we compared semantic performance in logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia and typical amnestic Alzheimer's disease. Given the differences in lesion and atrophy patterns in semantic aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia versus semantic-dementia/semantic-variant primary progressive aphasia patients, our second aim was to examine atrophy patterns in people with logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia and typical Alzheimer's disease compared to age-matched controls. Twenty-seven patients participated in the study. People were grouped into those meeting consensus criteria for logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (N = 10) and others who may have previously satisfied definitions of logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia but had progressed with multi-domain cognitive impairments (herein referred to as 'logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia+'; N = 8). People with typical amnestic Alzheimer's disease (N = 9) were relatively preserved across verbal and non-verbal semantic assessments. Logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia patients were impaired on both verbal and non-verbal semantic tasks and their impairments showed the hallmark characteristics of a semantic control deficit. Logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia and logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia + patients showed effects of varying semantic control demands, positive cueing effects, and correlated performance between semantic and executive tasks. Whole-brain voxel-based morphometry, comparing each of the patient groups to age-matched controls, revealed significantly reduced grey and white matter in the bilateral hippocampi and lateral temporal regions in typical Alzheimer's disease patients. The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia group exhibited an asymmetric pattern of reduced grey and white matter intensity in the language-dominant left hemisphere, including a significant portion of the lateral and medial temporal lobe. Logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia + patients demonstrated reduced grey and white matter in the left temporal lobe extending sub-cortically, anteriorly and posteriorly, as well as right temporal involvement. Our findings could aid diagnostic sub-typing of primary progressive aphasia by adopting semantic control features and offer improved clinical characterization of logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia in the trajectory of semantic decline.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型的语义控制能力受损。
我们研究了原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型患者的语义认知,包括(i)言语和非言语语义表现的状况;以及(ii)语义缺陷是否反映了语义控制受损。我们之所以先验地假设原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型患者会表现出语义控制障碍,是因为与原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型典型相关的颞顶叶萎缩与中风后语义失语症和韦尼克失语症相关的病变在解剖学上存在重叠,而这些病变会导致异模态语义控制障碍。我们研究了原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型的语义缺陷的存在、类型(语义表征和语义控制;言语和非言语)和进展情况。由于原发性进行性失语的对数开放变异型患者大多患有阿尔茨海默病病理,并且是包括阿尔茨海默病亚型在内的更广泛的多维表型空间的一部分,因此我们比较了原发性进行性失语的对数开放变异型和典型失忆性阿尔茨海默病的语义表现。鉴于语义性失语症和韦尼克失语症与语义痴呆症/语义变异型原发性进行性失语症患者在病变和萎缩模式上的差异,我们的第二个目的是研究原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型和典型阿尔茨海默病患者与年龄匹配对照组相比的萎缩模式。27 名患者参与了这项研究。研究人员将患者分为符合原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型共识标准的患者(10 人)和其他可能曾符合原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型定义但已出现多领域认知障碍的患者(以下称为 "原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型+";8 人)。典型失忆性阿尔茨海默病患者(9人)在言语和非言语语义评估中的表现相对较好。原发性进行性失语症的对数开放变异型患者在言语和非言语语义任务上都存在障碍,他们的障碍显示出语义控制缺陷的标志性特征。原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型和原发性进行性失语症对数开放变异型+患者表现出不同语义控制要求的影响、积极的提示效应以及语义和执行任务之间的相关表现。基于体素的全脑形态测量法将每个患者组与年龄匹配的对照组进行比较,发现典型阿尔茨海默病患者的双侧海马和侧颞区的灰质和白质明显减少。原发性进行性失语的对数开放变异型患者组的语言优势左半球,包括颞叶外侧和内侧的很大一部分,表现出灰质和白质强度降低的不对称模式。原发性进行性失语症对数变异型+患者的左侧颞叶灰质和白质减少,向皮质下、前方和后方延伸,右侧颞叶也受累。我们的研究结果有助于通过语义控制特征对原发性进行性失语症进行诊断分型,并在语义衰退的轨迹上对原发性进行性失语症的对数开放变异型进行临床特征描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between leisure time physical activity patterns, Alzheimer's disease markers and cognition. Unmasking paramagnetic rim multiple sclerosis lesions: the advantages of quantitative susceptibility mapping over phase imaging. The challenge of long-term stroke outcome prediction and how statistical correlates do not imply predictive value. Causal relationships between hippocampal volumetric traits and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: a Mendelian randomization study. Early subacute frontal callosal microstructure and language outcomes after stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1