Predictors of dilation difficulty in gender-affirming vaginoplasty.

Peter E Shamamian, Derek Chen, Anya Wang, Subha Karim, Carol Wang, Keisha E Montalmant, Alison Trebby, John Henry Pang, Bella Avanessian, Jess Ting, Elan Horesh
{"title":"Predictors of dilation difficulty in gender-affirming vaginoplasty.","authors":"Peter E Shamamian, Derek Chen, Anya Wang, Subha Karim, Carol Wang, Keisha E Montalmant, Alison Trebby, John Henry Pang, Bella Avanessian, Jess Ting, Elan Horesh","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A necessary component of postoperative care in gender-affirming vaginoplasty is the dilation of the neovaginal canal. Difficulty with dilation can cause patient pain and distress, often decreasing compliance and leading to partial or complete closure of the neovaginal canal. This study sought to evaluate the sociodemographic, operative, and comorbid characteristics that contribute to patient difficulty with neovaginal dilation. A retrospective review of patients undergoing gender-affirming vaginoplasty between June 2019 and July 2023 was carried out. The primary outcome was consistent dilation difficulty reported during the follow-up clinic visits for any reason. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare characteristics and outcomes of each group. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. In total, 614 patients were included in the study, 506 (82.5%) patients had no dilation difficulty and 108 (17.5%) had dilation difficulty. Medicare insurance status (p=0.007), unemployment (p<0.001), hyperlipidemia (p=0.019), HIV (p<0.001), psychiatric diagnosis besides gender dysphoria (p=0.048), and primary peritoneal vaginoplasty (p=0.019) were associated with postoperative dilation difficulty. Multiple logistic regression revealed higher odds of dilation difficulty in patients who are unemployed (OR 2.740, 95% CI 1.587-4.732, p<0.001), have HIV (OR 2.588, 95% CI 1.290-5.190, p=0.007), have a psychiatric diagnosis besides gender dysphoria (OR 1.606, 95% CI 1.001-2.577, p=0.049), or received a primary peritoneal graft (OR 3.202, 95% CI 1.212-8.460, p=0.019). The risk of postoperative dilation difficulty may be associated with multiple aspects of the care spectrum. Understanding these risks and continued encouragement of dilation is critical to optimizing patient outcomes and dilation success.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"178-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A necessary component of postoperative care in gender-affirming vaginoplasty is the dilation of the neovaginal canal. Difficulty with dilation can cause patient pain and distress, often decreasing compliance and leading to partial or complete closure of the neovaginal canal. This study sought to evaluate the sociodemographic, operative, and comorbid characteristics that contribute to patient difficulty with neovaginal dilation. A retrospective review of patients undergoing gender-affirming vaginoplasty between June 2019 and July 2023 was carried out. The primary outcome was consistent dilation difficulty reported during the follow-up clinic visits for any reason. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare characteristics and outcomes of each group. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. In total, 614 patients were included in the study, 506 (82.5%) patients had no dilation difficulty and 108 (17.5%) had dilation difficulty. Medicare insurance status (p=0.007), unemployment (p<0.001), hyperlipidemia (p=0.019), HIV (p<0.001), psychiatric diagnosis besides gender dysphoria (p=0.048), and primary peritoneal vaginoplasty (p=0.019) were associated with postoperative dilation difficulty. Multiple logistic regression revealed higher odds of dilation difficulty in patients who are unemployed (OR 2.740, 95% CI 1.587-4.732, p<0.001), have HIV (OR 2.588, 95% CI 1.290-5.190, p=0.007), have a psychiatric diagnosis besides gender dysphoria (OR 1.606, 95% CI 1.001-2.577, p=0.049), or received a primary peritoneal graft (OR 3.202, 95% CI 1.212-8.460, p=0.019). The risk of postoperative dilation difficulty may be associated with multiple aspects of the care spectrum. Understanding these risks and continued encouragement of dilation is critical to optimizing patient outcomes and dilation success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别确认阴道成形术中扩张困难的预测因素。
性别确认阴道成形术术后护理的一个必要组成部分是新阴道管的扩张。扩张困难可引起患者疼痛和困扰,往往降低依从性,导致部分或完全关闭新阴道管。本研究旨在评估导致患者新阴道扩张困难的社会人口学、手术和合并症特征。对2019年6月至2023年7月期间接受性别确认阴道成形术的患者进行了回顾性研究。主要结果是在任何原因的随访期间报告的持续扩张困难。采用单因素和多因素分析比较各组的特征和结果。统计学意义设为p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of massive liposuction surgery of the abdomen and flanks on insulin and some adipokines. Letter comments on: 'Current trends in retraction of plastic surgery and reconstruction research'. The rising NHS burden from cosmetic surgery procedures performed abroad and non-surgical procedures performed in the United Kingdom. Response to José Antonio Arellano et al. to their comments on our article "A single-center retrospective comparison of muscle versus cutaneous free flaps for posterior elbow defect reconstruction". In Reply to Comment on "Timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphoscintigraphy before surgery for melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1