首页 > 最新文献

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS最新文献

英文 中文
Investigating the relationship between sensation and satisfaction in reduction mammaplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 研究乳房缩小整形术中感觉与满意度之间的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.028
Sophia Arbuiso, Sophia Salingaros, Lujain Al-Emadi, Malini Chinta, Ashley Zhang, Paul Christos, Kevin Pain, Clara Choate, David M Otterburn

Background: Reduction mammaplasties are among the plastic surgery procedures with the highest rates of patient satisfaction. However, the loss of postoperative sensation in the breast and nipple-areolar complex remains a concern. In light of increasing interest in nerve-preservation techniques, we sought to investigate the relationship between retained sensation with overall satisfaction in reduction mammaplasty in current literature.

Methods: The authors systematically reviewed all studies that reported postoperative sensation and satisfaction in patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty, using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Scopus databases in October 2023. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality using an NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Meta-analyses of proportions were conducted.

Results: A total of 48 studies met the eligibility criteria. The median quality assessment score was 8/10. For 28 studies eligible for statistical analysis, random effects pooled proportion for patients that retained preoperative sensation was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67-0.87), and for patients that report postoperative satisfaction was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97). Overall, the studies reported a relatively wide range of sensation outcomes with consistently high satisfaction scores.

Conclusion: The results of this systematic review suggest that other surgical factors (e.g., relief of macromastia symptoms, aesthetic appearance) play a greater role in patient satisfaction compared to sensation retention in reduction mammaplasty. Wide variability in assessment methodologies for both sensation and satisfaction was noted. Standardizing and objectifying measurement techniques, particularly for sensation, will help further characterize the relationship between sensation and satisfaction in future studies.

背景:乳房缩小术是患者满意度最高的整形手术之一。然而,乳房和乳头乳晕复合体术后感觉缺失仍是一个令人担忧的问题。鉴于人们对神经保留技术的兴趣与日俱增,我们试图研究现有文献中保留的感觉与乳房缩小整形术总体满意度之间的关系:作者于 2023 年 10 月使用 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane、CINAHL 和 Scopus 数据库,系统地回顾了所有报道乳房缩小整形术患者术后感觉和满意度的研究。研究采用 NIH 质量评估工具对方法学质量进行评估。对比例进行了元分析:共有 48 项研究符合资格标准。质量评估得分的中位数为 8/10。在符合统计分析条件的 28 项研究中,保留术前感觉的患者的随机效应汇总比例为 0.78(95% CI:0.67-0.87),报告术后满意度的患者的随机效应汇总比例为 0.94(95% CI:0.91-0.97)。总体而言,研究报告的感觉结果范围相对较广,满意度评分始终较高:本系统综述的结果表明,与乳房缩小整形术的感觉保持相比,其他手术因素(如巨乳症症状的缓解、外观美观)对患者满意度的影响更大。感觉和满意度的评估方法存在很大差异。标准化和客观化的测量技术,尤其是感觉测量技术,将有助于在未来的研究中进一步确定感觉和满意度之间的关系。
{"title":"Investigating the relationship between sensation and satisfaction in reduction mammaplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sophia Arbuiso, Sophia Salingaros, Lujain Al-Emadi, Malini Chinta, Ashley Zhang, Paul Christos, Kevin Pain, Clara Choate, David M Otterburn","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reduction mammaplasties are among the plastic surgery procedures with the highest rates of patient satisfaction. However, the loss of postoperative sensation in the breast and nipple-areolar complex remains a concern. In light of increasing interest in nerve-preservation techniques, we sought to investigate the relationship between retained sensation with overall satisfaction in reduction mammaplasty in current literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors systematically reviewed all studies that reported postoperative sensation and satisfaction in patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty, using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Scopus databases in October 2023. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality using an NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Meta-analyses of proportions were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 studies met the eligibility criteria. The median quality assessment score was 8/10. For 28 studies eligible for statistical analysis, random effects pooled proportion for patients that retained preoperative sensation was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67-0.87), and for patients that report postoperative satisfaction was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.97). Overall, the studies reported a relatively wide range of sensation outcomes with consistently high satisfaction scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this systematic review suggest that other surgical factors (e.g., relief of macromastia symptoms, aesthetic appearance) play a greater role in patient satisfaction compared to sensation retention in reduction mammaplasty. Wide variability in assessment methodologies for both sensation and satisfaction was noted. Standardizing and objectifying measurement techniques, particularly for sensation, will help further characterize the relationship between sensation and satisfaction in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sensory restoration following breast reconstruction with operative reinnervation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 手术神经再支配乳房重建后的感觉恢复:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.021
Ammara Ghumman, Patrick J Kim, Kristen McAlpine, Fanyi Meng, Laura Snell, Joan Lipa

Background: There is currently no consensus on the efficacy of operative reinnervation at the time of post-mastectomy reconstruction. This review compares postoperative sensation between innervated and non-innervated flaps in breast reconstruction through systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: EMBASE, Ovid, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 6, 2023. The primary outcome was level of sensation postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included presence of sensation, breast-related complications, operative time, and quality of life. Meta-analysis was conducted using mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes and odds radio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes. Quality of evidence was appraised using RoB-2/ROBINS-I. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.

Results: Twenty-eight studies were included; studies were observational studies except one randomized controlled trial. Common flaps were deep inferior epigastric perforator (11/28, 39.3%) and transversus rectus abdominis muscle (9/28, 32.1%). Innervated flaps were significantly associated with improved level of postoperative sensation (SMD: -0.94, 95% CI: [-1.35; -0.53], I2: 78%, p < 0.01), presence of postoperative sensation (OR: 11.4, 95% CI: [5.09; 24.5], I2: 0%, p < 0.01), and improved postoperative BREAST-Q scores (MD: 8.11, 95% CI: [4.33; 11.89], I2: 27%, p < 0.01). However, certainty of evidence was low/very low for all outcomes. Most studies had moderate risk of bias (56.5%). There were no statistically significant differences in breast-related complications or operative time.

Conclusions: Operative reinnervation in breast reconstruction is significantly associated with improved level and presence of postoperative sensation and BREAST-Q scores without significant increase in breast-related complications/operative time. More high-quality studies are required to improve the certainty of outcomes.

背景:目前,关于乳房切除术后重建时手术神经再支配的疗效尚未达成共识。本综述通过系统综述和荟萃分析比较了乳房重建中神经支配瓣和非神经支配瓣的术后感觉:方法:检索了从开始到 2023 年 12 月 6 日的 EMBASE、Ovid 和 CENTRAL。主要结果是术后的感觉水平。次要结果包括是否有感觉、乳房相关并发症、手术时间和生活质量。对于连续性结果,采用平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD)进行荟萃分析;对于二分性结果,采用几率收音机(OR)进行荟萃分析。证据质量采用 RoB-2/ROBINS-I 进行评估。证据的确定性采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法进行评估:共纳入 28 项研究;除一项随机对照试验外,其余均为观察性研究。常见的皮瓣是下腹深穿孔肌皮瓣(11/28,39.3%)和腹直肌横肌皮瓣(9/28,32.1%)。有神经支配的皮瓣与术后感觉水平的改善明显相关(SMD:-0.94,95% CI:[-1.35; -0.53],I2:78%,P 2:0%,P 2:27%,P 结论:乳房再造术中的神经再支配与术后感觉水平和存在的改善以及 BREAST-Q 评分显著相关,而乳房相关并发症/手术时间不会明显增加。需要更多高质量的研究来提高结果的确定性。
{"title":"Sensory restoration following breast reconstruction with operative reinnervation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ammara Ghumman, Patrick J Kim, Kristen McAlpine, Fanyi Meng, Laura Snell, Joan Lipa","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.021","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is currently no consensus on the efficacy of operative reinnervation at the time of post-mastectomy reconstruction. This review compares postoperative sensation between innervated and non-innervated flaps in breast reconstruction through systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMBASE, Ovid, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 6, 2023. The primary outcome was level of sensation postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included presence of sensation, breast-related complications, operative time, and quality of life. Meta-analysis was conducted using mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes and odds radio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes. Quality of evidence was appraised using RoB-2/ROBINS-I. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies were included; studies were observational studies except one randomized controlled trial. Common flaps were deep inferior epigastric perforator (11/28, 39.3%) and transversus rectus abdominis muscle (9/28, 32.1%). Innervated flaps were significantly associated with improved level of postoperative sensation (SMD: -0.94, 95% CI: [-1.35; -0.53], I<sup>2</sup>: 78%, p < 0.01), presence of postoperative sensation (OR: 11.4, 95% CI: [5.09; 24.5], I<sup>2</sup>: 0%, p < 0.01), and improved postoperative BREAST-Q scores (MD: 8.11, 95% CI: [4.33; 11.89], I<sup>2</sup>: 27%, p < 0.01). However, certainty of evidence was low/very low for all outcomes. Most studies had moderate risk of bias (56.5%). There were no statistically significant differences in breast-related complications or operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Operative reinnervation in breast reconstruction is significantly associated with improved level and presence of postoperative sensation and BREAST-Q scores without significant increase in breast-related complications/operative time. More high-quality studies are required to improve the certainty of outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142559885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgical risks, reconstruction, and facial nerve outcomes in parotidectomy: Insights from ACS-NSQIP data. 腮腺切除术的手术风险、重建和面神经预后:从 ACS-NSQIP 数据中获得的启示。
Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.069
Michael J Brenner
{"title":"Surgical risks, reconstruction, and facial nerve outcomes in parotidectomy: Insights from ACS-NSQIP data.","authors":"Michael J Brenner","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.069","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142383017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceptance and willingness of patients with chronic facial nerve palsy for an implantable device that assists with eye closure. 慢性面神经麻痹患者对植入式闭眼辅助装置的接受程度和意愿。
Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.028
Paul Rozenbroek, Annie Waugh, Gillian Heller, Raymond Hayler, Jacinta Cleary, Shaheen Hasmat, Nigel H Lovell, Gregg Suaning, Jonathan R Clark, Tsu-Hui Hubert Low

Background: Patients with facial nerve palsy often experience lagophthalmos (incomplete eye closure), which can lead to exposure keratitis. The Bionic Lid Implant for Natural Eye Closure (BLINC) is a medical device designed to mimic the more natural blink kinetics than traditional lid loading techniques.

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate potential factors that might influence the design of the BLINC device and willingness of participant to undergo the implant placement surgery.

Methods: Patients attending a multidisciplinary facial nerve clinic were invited to complete a survey addressing patient acceptance of the BLINC device implantation.

Results: Seventy-two patients were mailed the survey, of which 50 returned completed surveys (69%). The most important factor identified by participants was the device function (81% ranked as very important) and the least important factor was cost (16% ranked as very important). Median acceptable device function time was 5 years (range 1-10 years). Ten participants (20%) indicated willingness to be the first to trial BLINC. Women were more likely to rate visual appearance as important (OR 3.32, CI 1.14-9.62, p = 0.028), and less likely to rate user friendliness as important (OR 0.16, CI 0.04-0.52, p = 0.0021). Older participants were more likely to rate the length of recovery period as important (OR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.006). Participants with complete eye closure were less likely to be willing to trial the implant (OR 0.08, CI 0.00-0.53, p = 0.006, whilst patients with eye irritation were more willing to trial the implant (OR 7.20, CI 1.12-142, p = 0.036).

Conclusion: Certain patient demographics impact patient aesthetic and functional preferences and the willingness to trial the BLINC device.

背景:面神经麻痹患者经常会出现眼睑下垂(闭眼不全),这可能会导致暴露性角膜炎。自然闭眼仿生眼睑植入物(BLINC)是一种医疗设备,旨在模仿比传统眼睑加载技术更自然的眨眼动力学。研究目的:本研究旨在评估可能影响 BLINC 设备设计的潜在因素,以及受试者是否愿意接受植入手术:方法:邀请在多学科面神经诊所就诊的患者完成一项调查,了解患者对 BLINC 装置植入的接受程度:结果:共向 72 名患者邮寄了调查表,其中 50 人(69%)寄回了填写完整的调查表。参与者认为最重要的因素是设备功能(81% 认为非常重要),最不重要的因素是成本(16% 认为非常重要)。可接受的设备功能时间中位数为 5 年(1-10 年不等)。十名参与者(20%)表示愿意成为第一个试用 BLINC 的人。女性更有可能将视觉外观评为重要(OR 3.32,CI 1.14-9.62,p = 0.028),而将用户友好性评为重要的可能性较低(OR 0.16,CI 0.04-0.52,p = 0.0021)。年龄较大的参与者更倾向于认为恢复期的长短很重要(OR 1.04,CI 1.01-1.08,p = 0.006)。眼睛完全闭合的患者不太愿意试用种植体(OR 0.08,CI 0.00-0.53,p = 0.006),而眼睛不适的患者更愿意试用种植体(OR 7.20,CI 1.12-142,p = 0.036):某些患者的人口统计学特征会影响患者的美学和功能偏好以及试用 BLINC 装置的意愿。
{"title":"Acceptance and willingness of patients with chronic facial nerve palsy for an implantable device that assists with eye closure.","authors":"Paul Rozenbroek, Annie Waugh, Gillian Heller, Raymond Hayler, Jacinta Cleary, Shaheen Hasmat, Nigel H Lovell, Gregg Suaning, Jonathan R Clark, Tsu-Hui Hubert Low","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with facial nerve palsy often experience lagophthalmos (incomplete eye closure), which can lead to exposure keratitis. The Bionic Lid Implant for Natural Eye Closure (BLINC) is a medical device designed to mimic the more natural blink kinetics than traditional lid loading techniques.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate potential factors that might influence the design of the BLINC device and willingness of participant to undergo the implant placement surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients attending a multidisciplinary facial nerve clinic were invited to complete a survey addressing patient acceptance of the BLINC device implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two patients were mailed the survey, of which 50 returned completed surveys (69%). The most important factor identified by participants was the device function (81% ranked as very important) and the least important factor was cost (16% ranked as very important). Median acceptable device function time was 5 years (range 1-10 years). Ten participants (20%) indicated willingness to be the first to trial BLINC. Women were more likely to rate visual appearance as important (OR 3.32, CI 1.14-9.62, p = 0.028), and less likely to rate user friendliness as important (OR 0.16, CI 0.04-0.52, p = 0.0021). Older participants were more likely to rate the length of recovery period as important (OR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.006). Participants with complete eye closure were less likely to be willing to trial the implant (OR 0.08, CI 0.00-0.53, p = 0.006, whilst patients with eye irritation were more willing to trial the implant (OR 7.20, CI 1.12-142, p = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Certain patient demographics impact patient aesthetic and functional preferences and the willingness to trial the BLINC device.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142396420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk factors and outcomes after surgery for malignant neoplasm of the parotid gland: An ACS-NSQIP study. 腮腺恶性肿瘤手术后的风险因素和预后:ACS-NSQIP 研究。
Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.067
Leonard Knoedler, Samuel Knoedler, Cosima C Hoch, Ali-Farid Safi, Barbara Wollenberg, Michael Alfertshofer, Bohdan Pomahac, Martin Kauke-Navarro, James Clune

Background: Malignant neoplasms of the parotid gland (MPG) are clinically challenging due to aggressive growth and metastasis. Despite tumor resection being the primary treatment, there is a paucity of studies on postsurgical outcomes and preoperative risk factors for MPG.

Materials and methods: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who underwent MPG surgery between 2008 and 2021. 30-day postoperative outcomes and risk factors predisposing to the occurrence of complications were assessed.

Results: The study population included 3052 patients, the majority of whom were males (n = 1842; 60%) and White (n = 2017; 66%). The average age was 63 ± 16 years. The most common comorbidities were obesity (n = 1182; 39%) and hypertension (n = 1533; 50%). Surgical procedures were performed predominantly in the inpatient setting (n = 1773; 58%) by ENT surgeons (n = 2767; 91%). Overall, complications were reported in 6.8% (n = 209) of patients. Inpatient setting (p < 0.001), renal failure (p < 0.001), smoking (p = 0.012), as well as increased creatinine (p < 0.001) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels (p = 0.001) were identified as risk factors for complications. In addition, concurrent microsurgical procedures such as flap surgery and/or nerve grafting significantly increased the risk of postoperative adverse events (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our analysis revealed that complication rates were associated with high creatinine and BUN levels, inpatient surgery, renal failure, higher American Society of Anesthesiology classes, and smoking. We also found that concurrent microsurgical procedures were predictive factors for complications. These findings can inform patient counseling, preoperative planning, and risk stratification.

背景:腮腺恶性肿瘤(MPG)具有侵袭性生长和转移,在临床上具有挑战性。尽管肿瘤切除是主要的治疗方法,但有关腮腺恶性肿瘤术后效果和术前风险因素的研究却很少:我们查询了美国外科医生学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库,以确定在 2008 年至 2021 年期间接受 MPG 手术的患者。评估了术后 30 天的结果和导致并发症发生的风险因素:研究对象包括 3052 名患者,其中大部分为男性(n = 1842;60%)和白人(n = 2017;66%)。平均年龄为 63±16 岁。最常见的合并症是肥胖(n = 1182;39%)和高血压(n = 1533;50%)。手术主要在住院环境中进行(n = 1773;58%),由耳鼻喉科外科医生实施(n = 2767;91%)。总体而言,6.8%(n = 209)的患者出现了并发症。住院环境我们的分析表明,并发症发生率与肌酐和尿素氮水平高、住院手术、肾功能衰竭、美国麻醉学会等级较高和吸烟有关。我们还发现,同时进行的显微外科手术是并发症的预测因素。这些发现可为患者咨询、术前计划和风险分层提供参考。
{"title":"Risk factors and outcomes after surgery for malignant neoplasm of the parotid gland: An ACS-NSQIP study.","authors":"Leonard Knoedler, Samuel Knoedler, Cosima C Hoch, Ali-Farid Safi, Barbara Wollenberg, Michael Alfertshofer, Bohdan Pomahac, Martin Kauke-Navarro, James Clune","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malignant neoplasms of the parotid gland (MPG) are clinically challenging due to aggressive growth and metastasis. Despite tumor resection being the primary treatment, there is a paucity of studies on postsurgical outcomes and preoperative risk factors for MPG.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who underwent MPG surgery between 2008 and 2021. 30-day postoperative outcomes and risk factors predisposing to the occurrence of complications were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 3052 patients, the majority of whom were males (n = 1842; 60%) and White (n = 2017; 66%). The average age was 63 ± 16 years. The most common comorbidities were obesity (n = 1182; 39%) and hypertension (n = 1533; 50%). Surgical procedures were performed predominantly in the inpatient setting (n = 1773; 58%) by ENT surgeons (n = 2767; 91%). Overall, complications were reported in 6.8% (n = 209) of patients. Inpatient setting (p < 0.001), renal failure (p < 0.001), smoking (p = 0.012), as well as increased creatinine (p < 0.001) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels (p = 0.001) were identified as risk factors for complications. In addition, concurrent microsurgical procedures such as flap surgery and/or nerve grafting significantly increased the risk of postoperative adverse events (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis revealed that complication rates were associated with high creatinine and BUN levels, inpatient surgery, renal failure, higher American Society of Anesthesiology classes, and smoking. We also found that concurrent microsurgical procedures were predictive factors for complications. These findings can inform patient counseling, preoperative planning, and risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142515418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-centered innovation for facial nerve palsy: Bionic reanimation for the paralytic eyelid. 以患者为中心的面神经麻痹创新疗法:眼睑麻痹仿生再造术。
Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.037
Michael J Brenner
{"title":"Patient-centered innovation for facial nerve palsy: Bionic reanimation for the paralytic eyelid.","authors":"Michael J Brenner","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.037","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142335350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on "Exploring the use, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of prehabilitation and rehabilitation in abdominoplasty surgeries: A scoping review". 关于 "探索腹部整形手术前康复和康复的使用、结果、障碍和促进因素:范围界定综述 "的评论。
Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.026
Jing Qin Tay
{"title":"Commentary on \"Exploring the use, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of prehabilitation and rehabilitation in abdominoplasty surgeries: A scoping review\".","authors":"Jing Qin Tay","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142304914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adipose-derived exosomes as a preventative strategy against complications in hyaluronic acid filler applications: A comprehensive in vivo analysis. 脂肪源性外泌体作为一种预防透明质酸填充剂应用并发症的策略:体内综合分析。
Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.071
Jeonghun Kim, Taehee Jo, Hajin Nam, Byung Jun Kim, Seung Min Nam, Junhyung Kim, Jaehoon Choi, Woonhyeok Jeong

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of exosomes derived from adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) on complications arising from hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injections.

Methods: An HA hydrogel blended with adipose stem cell-derived exosomes was prepared and administered to the inguinal fat pads of 16 C57BL/6J mice. The control group received only HA filler (HA group), and the study group was treated with a combination of HA filler and exosomes (exoHA group). Biopsy was performed 1 week and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after the injections. The effects were assessed using hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome staining for histological examination, immunohistochemistry for collagen type I and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), RNA sequencing, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Il6, Ifng, Hif1a, Acta2, Col1a1).

Results: RNA sequencing revealed significant downregulation of the hypoxia (false discovery rate [FDR] q = 0.007), inflammatory response (FDR q = 0.009), TNFα signaling via NFκB (FDR q = 0.007), and IL6 JAK-STAT signaling (FDR q = 0.009) gene sets in the exoHA group. Quantitative PCR demonstrated a decrease in expression of proinflammatory cytokines (Il6, P < 0.05; Hif1a, P < 0.05) and fibrosis markers (Acta2, P < 0.05; Col1a1, P < 0.05) within the exoHA group, indicating reduced inflammation and fibrosis. Compared to the exoHA group, the HA group exhibited a thicker and more irregular capsules surrounding the HA filler after 6 months.

Conclusion: The addition of ASC-derived exosomes to HA fillers significantly reduces inflammation and accelerates collagen capsule maturation, indicating a promising strategy to mitigate the formation of HA filler-related nodules.

背景:本研究旨在探讨脂肪源性干细胞(ASCs)提取的外泌体对透明质酸(HA)填充注射并发症的影响:本研究旨在探讨脂肪干细胞衍生的外泌体对透明质酸(HA)填充剂注射引起的并发症的影响:方法:制备混有脂肪干细胞衍生外泌体的HA水凝胶,并将其注射到16只C57BL/6J小鼠的腹股沟脂肪垫。对照组只接受HA填充物(HA组),研究组则接受HA填充物和外泌体的组合治疗(exoHA组)。分别在注射后 1 周、1、2、3 和 6 个月进行活组织检查。使用苏木精、伊红和马森三色染色法进行组织学检查、I型胶原蛋白和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)免疫组化、RNA测序和定量实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)(Il6、Ifng、Hif1a、Acta2、Col1a1)评估效果:结果:RNA测序显示,在exoHA组中,缺氧(假发现率[FDR] q = 0.007)、炎症反应(FDR q = 0.009)、通过NFκB的TNFα信号转导(FDR q = 0.007)和IL6 JAK-STAT信号转导(FDR q = 0.009)基因组明显下调。定量 PCR 显示促炎细胞因子(Il6、P 结论)的表达有所下降:在 HA 填充物中添加源自 ASC 的外泌体可明显减轻炎症反应并加速胶原囊成熟,这表明这是一种很有前景的策略,可减轻 HA 填充物相关结节的形成。
{"title":"Adipose-derived exosomes as a preventative strategy against complications in hyaluronic acid filler applications: A comprehensive in vivo analysis.","authors":"Jeonghun Kim, Taehee Jo, Hajin Nam, Byung Jun Kim, Seung Min Nam, Junhyung Kim, Jaehoon Choi, Woonhyeok Jeong","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of exosomes derived from adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) on complications arising from hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An HA hydrogel blended with adipose stem cell-derived exosomes was prepared and administered to the inguinal fat pads of 16 C57BL/6J mice. The control group received only HA filler (HA group), and the study group was treated with a combination of HA filler and exosomes (exoHA group). Biopsy was performed 1 week and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after the injections. The effects were assessed using hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome staining for histological examination, immunohistochemistry for collagen type I and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), RNA sequencing, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Il6, Ifng, Hif1a, Acta2, Col1a1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RNA sequencing revealed significant downregulation of the hypoxia (false discovery rate [FDR] q = 0.007), inflammatory response (FDR q = 0.009), TNFα signaling via NFκB (FDR q = 0.007), and IL6 JAK-STAT signaling (FDR q = 0.009) gene sets in the exoHA group. Quantitative PCR demonstrated a decrease in expression of proinflammatory cytokines (Il6, P < 0.05; Hif1a, P < 0.05) and fibrosis markers (Acta2, P < 0.05; Col1a1, P < 0.05) within the exoHA group, indicating reduced inflammation and fibrosis. Compared to the exoHA group, the HA group exhibited a thicker and more irregular capsules surrounding the HA filler after 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of ASC-derived exosomes to HA fillers significantly reduces inflammation and accelerates collagen capsule maturation, indicating a promising strategy to mitigate the formation of HA filler-related nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142057704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does post-mastectomy radiation therapy worsen outcomes in immediate autologous breast flap reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. 乳房切除术后放射治疗是否会使立即自体乳房瓣重建的结果恶化?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.7244/cmj.2021.04.001.1
Belle Liew, C. Southall, M. Kanapathy, D. Nikkhah
BACKGROUNDThere is great uncertainty regarding the practice of immediate autologous breast reconstruction (IBR) when post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated. Plastic surgery units differ in their treatment protocols, with some recommending delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) following PMRT. IBR offers significant cosmetic and psychosocial benefits; however, the morbidity of flap exposure to radiation remains unclear.OBJECTIVEThe aim of this review was to comprehensively analyze the existing literature comparing autologous flaps exposed to PMRT and flaps with no radiation exposure.METHODSA comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was conducted in November 2020. Primary studies comparing IBR with and without adjuvant PMRT were assessed for the following primary outcomes: clinical complications, observer-reported outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction rates. Meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled risk ratios of individual complications.RESULTSTwenty-one articles involving 3817 patients were included. Meta-analysis of pooled data gave risk ratios for fat necrosis (RR = 1.91, p < 0.00001), secondary surgery (RR = 1.62, p = 0.03) and volume loss (RR = 8.16, p < 0.00001) favoring unirradiated flaps, but no significant difference was observed in all other reported complications. The no-PMRT group scored significantly higher in observer-reported measures. However, self-reported aesthetic and general satisfaction rates were similar between groups.CONCLUSIONIBR should be offered after mastectomy to patients requiring PMRT. The higher risks of fat necrosis and contracture appear to be less clinically relevant as corroborated by positive scores from patients developing these complications. Preoperative and intraoperative measures should be taken to further optimize reconstruction and mitigate post-radiation sequel. Careful management of patients' expectations is also imperative.LEVEL OF EVIDENCELevel III.
背景:当乳房切除术后放射治疗(PMRT)指的是立即自体乳房重建(IBR)时,存在很大的不确定性。整形外科单位的治疗方案各不相同,有些建议在PMRT后进行延迟乳房重建(DBR)。IBR具有显著的美容和心理社会益处;然而,皮瓣暴露于辐射的发病率尚不清楚。目的综合分析已有文献,比较经PMRT照射的自体皮瓣与未经辐射照射的自体皮瓣。方法于2020年11月在MEDLINE、EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库中进行综合检索。比较IBR与无辅助PMRT的初步研究评估了以下主要结果:临床并发症,观察者报告的结果和患者报告的满意度。进行荟萃分析以获得单个并发症的合并风险比。结果共纳入文献21篇,3817例患者。综合数据的荟萃分析显示,未照射皮瓣的风险比为脂肪坏死(RR = 1.91, p < 0.00001)、二次手术(RR = 1.62, p = 0.03)和体积损失(RR = 8.16, p < 0.00001),但在所有其他报道的并发症中没有观察到显著差异。无pmrt组在观察者报告的测量中得分明显更高。然而,自我报告的审美和总体满意度在两组之间是相似的。结论乳腺切除术后需要PMRT的患者应给予ibr。出现这些并发症的患者的阳性评分证实,较高的脂肪坏死和挛缩风险似乎与临床相关性较低。术前及术中应采取措施进一步优化重建,减轻放疗后后遗症。仔细管理病人的期望也是必要的。证据等级:III级。
{"title":"Does post-mastectomy radiation therapy worsen outcomes in immediate autologous breast flap reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Belle Liew, C. Southall, M. Kanapathy, D. Nikkhah","doi":"10.7244/cmj.2021.04.001.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7244/cmj.2021.04.001.1","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\u0000There is great uncertainty regarding the practice of immediate autologous breast reconstruction (IBR) when post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated. Plastic surgery units differ in their treatment protocols, with some recommending delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) following PMRT. IBR offers significant cosmetic and psychosocial benefits; however, the morbidity of flap exposure to radiation remains unclear.\u0000\u0000\u0000OBJECTIVE\u0000The aim of this review was to comprehensively analyze the existing literature comparing autologous flaps exposed to PMRT and flaps with no radiation exposure.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was conducted in November 2020. Primary studies comparing IBR with and without adjuvant PMRT were assessed for the following primary outcomes: clinical complications, observer-reported outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction rates. Meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled risk ratios of individual complications.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Twenty-one articles involving 3817 patients were included. Meta-analysis of pooled data gave risk ratios for fat necrosis (RR = 1.91, p < 0.00001), secondary surgery (RR = 1.62, p = 0.03) and volume loss (RR = 8.16, p < 0.00001) favoring unirradiated flaps, but no significant difference was observed in all other reported complications. The no-PMRT group scored significantly higher in observer-reported measures. However, self-reported aesthetic and general satisfaction rates were similar between groups.\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000IBR should be offered after mastectomy to patients requiring PMRT. The higher risks of fat necrosis and contracture appear to be less clinically relevant as corroborated by positive scores from patients developing these complications. Preoperative and intraoperative measures should be taken to further optimize reconstruction and mitigate post-radiation sequel. Careful management of patients' expectations is also imperative.\u0000\u0000\u0000LEVEL OF EVIDENCE\u0000Level III.","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88109816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The Role of Social Media in Disseminating Plastic Surgery Research: The Relationship between Citations, Altmetrics and Article Characteristics 社交媒体在整形外科研究传播中的作用:引用、Altmetrics与文章特征之间的关系
Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.26.20182337
Michael C. Grant, K. Scott-Bridge, R. Wade
Background: Social media (SoMe) enables publishers and authors to disseminate content immediately and directly to interested end-users, on a global scale. Alternative metrics (altmetrics) are non-traditional bibliometrics which describe the exposure and impact of an article on freely available platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, Wikipedia and the news. Altmetrics are strongly associated with ultimate citation counts in various medical disciplines, except plastic surgery which represents the rational for this study. Methods: Altmetric explorer was used to extract altmetrics and citation rates for articles published during 2018 in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS), the Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, the Annals of Plastics Surgery and Plastic Surgery (also known as Chirurgie Plastique). Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to estimate the relationship between citations and predictors (presented as the incidence rate ratio, IRR with 95% confidence interval, CI). Results: Overall, 1215 plastic surgery articles were captured which were cited 3269 times. There was a strong and independent association between the number of mentions in SoMe and the number of times an article was cited (adjusted IRR 1.01 [95% CI 1.01, 1.1]), whereby each mention in SoMe (e.g. Tweets or Facebook posts) translated to one additional citation. Evidence synthesis articles (e.g. systematic reviews) were cited twice as often as other articles and again, the use of SoMe to advertise these outputs was independently associated with more citations (IRR 2.0 [95% CI 1.3, 3.2]). Conclusions: Dissemination of plastic surgery research through social media channels increases an articles impact as measured by citations.
背景:社交媒体(SoMe)使出版商和作者能够在全球范围内立即和直接地向感兴趣的最终用户传播内容。替代指标(altmetrics)是一种非传统的文献计量指标,它描述了一篇文章在Twitter、Facebook、维基百科和新闻等免费平台上的曝光率和影响力。Altmetrics与各种医学学科的最终引用数密切相关,但整形外科除外,它代表了本研究的合理性。方法:使用Altmetric explorer提取2018年发表在Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS)、the Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery、the Annals of Plastic Surgery and Plastic Surgery(也称为Chirurgie Plastique)上的文章的Altmetric和被引率。采用多变量负二项回归来估计引文与预测因子之间的关系(表示为发病率比,IRR, 95%置信区间,CI)。结果:共收录整形外科文献1215篇,被引3269次。在SoMe中被提及的次数和文章被引用的次数之间存在很强的独立关联(调整后的IRR 1.01 [95% CI 1.01, 1.1]),因此在SoMe中每提到一次(例如Tweets或Facebook帖子)就会被额外引用一次。证据合成文章(如系统评价)的引用次数是其他文章的两倍,同样,使用SoMe来宣传这些产出与更多的引用独立相关(IRR 2.0 [95% CI 1.3, 3.2])。结论:通过引用来衡量,通过社交媒体渠道传播整形外科研究增加了文章的影响力。
{"title":"The Role of Social Media in Disseminating Plastic Surgery Research: The Relationship between Citations, Altmetrics and Article Characteristics","authors":"Michael C. Grant, K. Scott-Bridge, R. Wade","doi":"10.1101/2020.08.26.20182337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.26.20182337","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Social media (SoMe) enables publishers and authors to disseminate content immediately and directly to interested end-users, on a global scale. Alternative metrics (altmetrics) are non-traditional bibliometrics which describe the exposure and impact of an article on freely available platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, Wikipedia and the news. Altmetrics are strongly associated with ultimate citation counts in various medical disciplines, except plastic surgery which represents the rational for this study. Methods: Altmetric explorer was used to extract altmetrics and citation rates for articles published during 2018 in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS), the Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, the Annals of Plastics Surgery and Plastic Surgery (also known as Chirurgie Plastique). Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to estimate the relationship between citations and predictors (presented as the incidence rate ratio, IRR with 95% confidence interval, CI). Results: Overall, 1215 plastic surgery articles were captured which were cited 3269 times. There was a strong and independent association between the number of mentions in SoMe and the number of times an article was cited (adjusted IRR 1.01 [95% CI 1.01, 1.1]), whereby each mention in SoMe (e.g. Tweets or Facebook posts) translated to one additional citation. Evidence synthesis articles (e.g. systematic reviews) were cited twice as often as other articles and again, the use of SoMe to advertise these outputs was independently associated with more citations (IRR 2.0 [95% CI 1.3, 3.2]). Conclusions: Dissemination of plastic surgery research through social media channels increases an articles impact as measured by citations.","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"35 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75873061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
期刊
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1