A phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial of inulin for the prevention of gut pathogen colonization and infection among patients admitted to the intensive care unit for sepsis

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-05232-3
Heekuk Park, Elissa Lynch, Alice Tillman, Kristen Lewis, Zhezhen Jin, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann, Julian A. Abrams, Daniel E. Freedberg
{"title":"A phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled trial of inulin for the prevention of gut pathogen colonization and infection among patients admitted to the intensive care unit for sepsis","authors":"Heekuk Park, Elissa Lynch, Alice Tillman, Kristen Lewis, Zhezhen Jin, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann, Julian A. Abrams, Daniel E. Freedberg","doi":"10.1186/s13054-024-05232-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) often have gut colonization with pathogenic bacteria and such colonization is associated with increased risk for death and infection. We conducted a trial to determine whether a prebiotic would improve the gut microbiome to decrease gut pathogen colonization and decrease downstream risk for infection among newly admitted medical ICU patients with sepsis. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adults who were admitted to the medical ICU for sepsis and were receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, inulin 16 g/day, or inulin 32 g/day which were given for seven days. The trial primary outcome was a surrogate measure for gut colonization resistance, namely the within-individual change from ICU admission to Day 3 in the relative abundance of short chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria based on rectal swabs. Additional outcomes sought to evaluate the impact of inulin on the gut microbiome and downstream clinical effects. Ninety participants were analyzed including 30 in each study group. There was no difference between study groups in the within-individual change in the relative abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria from ICU admission to ICU Day 3 (placebo: 0.0% change, IQR − 8·0% to + 7·4% vs. combined inulin: 0·0% change, IQR − 10·1% to + 4·8%; p = 0·91). At end-of-treatment on ICU Day 7, inulin did not affect SCFA-producer levels, microbiome diversity, or rates of gut colonization with pathogenic bacteria. After 30 days of clinical follow-up, inulin did not affect rates of death or clinical, culture-proven infection. Patients who died or developed culture-proven infections had lower relative abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria at ICU admission compared to those who did not (p = 0·03). Prebiotic fiber had minimal impact on the gut microbiome in the ICU and did not improve clinical outcomes. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03865706. Does prebiotic fiber alter the gut microbiome in the medical ICU to decrease gut pathogen colonization and decrease downstream risk for infection? This randomized controlled trial found that prebiotic inulin at doses up to 32 grams/day did not alter the gut microbiome among adults admitted to the ICU with sepsis. Even at these high doses, inulin was well tolerated. The taxonomic composition of the gut microbiome, assessed using longitudinal rectal swabs and stool samples for up to thirty days of follow-up, was not substantively altered by inulin; also unchanged by inulin were fecal levels of short chain fatty acids, gut colonization with pathogenic bacteria including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and clinical outcomes including culture-proven infection or death. Pre- and probiotics may face significant challenges in the ICU. Improved understanding of the dynamic changes within the gut microbiome in the ICU may lead to more targeted therapies.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05232-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) often have gut colonization with pathogenic bacteria and such colonization is associated with increased risk for death and infection. We conducted a trial to determine whether a prebiotic would improve the gut microbiome to decrease gut pathogen colonization and decrease downstream risk for infection among newly admitted medical ICU patients with sepsis. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adults who were admitted to the medical ICU for sepsis and were receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, inulin 16 g/day, or inulin 32 g/day which were given for seven days. The trial primary outcome was a surrogate measure for gut colonization resistance, namely the within-individual change from ICU admission to Day 3 in the relative abundance of short chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria based on rectal swabs. Additional outcomes sought to evaluate the impact of inulin on the gut microbiome and downstream clinical effects. Ninety participants were analyzed including 30 in each study group. There was no difference between study groups in the within-individual change in the relative abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria from ICU admission to ICU Day 3 (placebo: 0.0% change, IQR − 8·0% to + 7·4% vs. combined inulin: 0·0% change, IQR − 10·1% to + 4·8%; p = 0·91). At end-of-treatment on ICU Day 7, inulin did not affect SCFA-producer levels, microbiome diversity, or rates of gut colonization with pathogenic bacteria. After 30 days of clinical follow-up, inulin did not affect rates of death or clinical, culture-proven infection. Patients who died or developed culture-proven infections had lower relative abundance of SCFA-producing bacteria at ICU admission compared to those who did not (p = 0·03). Prebiotic fiber had minimal impact on the gut microbiome in the ICU and did not improve clinical outcomes. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03865706. Does prebiotic fiber alter the gut microbiome in the medical ICU to decrease gut pathogen colonization and decrease downstream risk for infection? This randomized controlled trial found that prebiotic inulin at doses up to 32 grams/day did not alter the gut microbiome among adults admitted to the ICU with sepsis. Even at these high doses, inulin was well tolerated. The taxonomic composition of the gut microbiome, assessed using longitudinal rectal swabs and stool samples for up to thirty days of follow-up, was not substantively altered by inulin; also unchanged by inulin were fecal levels of short chain fatty acids, gut colonization with pathogenic bacteria including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and clinical outcomes including culture-proven infection or death. Pre- and probiotics may face significant challenges in the ICU. Improved understanding of the dynamic changes within the gut microbiome in the ICU may lead to more targeted therapies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菊粉用于预防因败血症入住重症监护室的患者肠道病原体定植和感染的 2 期随机安慰剂对照试验
入住重症监护室(ICU)的患者肠道中经常会有病原菌定植,而这种定植与死亡和感染风险的增加有关。我们进行了一项试验,以确定益生菌是否能改善肠道微生物群,从而减少肠道病原体定植,降低新入院的内科 ICU 败血症患者的下游感染风险。这是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,对象是因败血症入住内科重症监护室并正在接受广谱抗生素治疗的成人。参与者按 1:1:1 的比例被随机分配到安慰剂、菊粉 16 克/天或菊粉 32 克/天,连续服用七天。试验的主要结果是肠道定植抗性的替代指标,即从进入重症监护室到第 3 天,根据直肠拭子测定的产生短链脂肪酸 (SCFA) 的细菌的相对丰度在个体内部的变化。其他结果旨在评估菊粉对肠道微生物组的影响以及下游临床效应。对 90 名参与者进行了分析,包括每个研究组的 30 名参与者。从重症监护室入院到重症监护室第 3 天,研究组之间产生 SCFA 的细菌相对丰度的个体内变化没有差异(安慰剂:变化 0.0%,IQR - 8-0% 到 + 7-4%;菊粉联合疗法:变化 0-0%,IQR - 10-1% 到 + 4-8%;P = 0-91)。在 ICU 第 7 天治疗结束时,菊粉并未影响 SCFA 生成物水平、微生物组多样性或致病菌肠道定植率。经过 30 天的临床随访,菊粉并不影响死亡或经培养证实的临床感染率。与未发生感染的患者相比,死亡或发生经培养证实的感染的患者在入住重症监护室时产生 SCFA 的细菌相对丰度较低(p = 0-03)。益生纤维对重症监护室肠道微生物群的影响微乎其微,也不会改善临床预后。临床试验:NCT03865706。益生纤维是否能改变内科重症监护室的肠道微生物群,从而减少肠道病原体定植并降低下游感染风险?这项随机对照试验发现,在因败血症入住重症监护室的成人中,剂量高达 32 克/天的益生菌菊粉并不会改变肠道微生物群。即使是如此高的剂量,菊粉的耐受性也很好。在长达 30 天的随访中,使用纵向直肠拭子和粪便样本对肠道微生物组的分类组成进行了评估,发现菊粉并没有对肠道微生物组产生实质性的改变;菊粉也没有改变粪便中短链脂肪酸的水平、肠道中致病菌的定植情况(包括耐万古霉素肠球菌和耐多药革兰氏阴性菌)以及临床结果(包括经培养证实的感染或死亡)。在重症监护病房中,前体和益生菌可能会面临重大挑战。加深对重症监护病房肠道微生物群动态变化的了解可能会带来更有针对性的疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Effect of an intensive care unit virtual reality intervention on relatives´ mental health distress: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial Enhancing depression risk assessment in critical care nurses: a call for quantitative modeling Clinical subtypes in critically ill patients with sepsis: validation and parsimonious classifier model development Relationship between skin microvascular blood flow and capillary refill time in critically ill patients Trendelenburg position is a reasonable alternative to passive leg raising for predicting volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1