Drones delivering automated external defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-12-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100841
Louise Kollander Jakobsen, Victor Kjærulf, Janet Bray, Theresa Mariero Olasveengen, Fredrik Folke
{"title":"Drones delivering automated external defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A scoping review.","authors":"Louise Kollander Jakobsen, Victor Kjærulf, Janet Bray, Theresa Mariero Olasveengen, Fredrik Folke","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a critical health concern, where prompt access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) significantly improves survival. This scoping review broadly investigates the feasibility and impact of dronedelivered AEDs for OHCA response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 6, 2024, with eligibility broadly including empirical data. The charting process involved iterative data extraction for thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 306 titles and, after duplicate removal, title/abstract screening, and full text review, included 39 studies. These were divided into three categories: 1) Real-world observational studies (n = 3), 2) Test flights/simulation studies and qualitative analyses (n = 15), and 3) Computer/prediction models (n = 21). Real-world studies demonstrated the feasibility of drone AED delivery, with a time advantage of 01:52 - 03:14 min over ambulances observed in 64-67 % of cases. Test flight/simulation and qualitative studies consistently reported feasibility and positive bystander experiences. Computer/prediction models exhibited considerable heterogeneity, yet all indicated significant time savings for AED delivery compared to traditional EMS methods. Moreover, seven studies estimated improved survival rates, with five assessing cost-effectiveness and favouring drone systems. Regional factors such as EMS response times, volunteer responder programmes, terrain, weather, and budget constraints influenced the system's effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across all categories, studies confirmed the feasibility of drone-delivered AED systems, with significant potential for reducing time to AED arrival compared to EMS arrival. Prediction models suggested enhanced survival alongside costeffectiveness. Further research, including more extensive real-world studies and regulatory advancements, is imperative to integrate drones effectively into OHCA response systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"21 ","pages":"100841"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a critical health concern, where prompt access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) significantly improves survival. This scoping review broadly investigates the feasibility and impact of dronedelivered AEDs for OHCA response.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 6, 2024, with eligibility broadly including empirical data. The charting process involved iterative data extraction for thematic analysis.

Results: We identified 306 titles and, after duplicate removal, title/abstract screening, and full text review, included 39 studies. These were divided into three categories: 1) Real-world observational studies (n = 3), 2) Test flights/simulation studies and qualitative analyses (n = 15), and 3) Computer/prediction models (n = 21). Real-world studies demonstrated the feasibility of drone AED delivery, with a time advantage of 01:52 - 03:14 min over ambulances observed in 64-67 % of cases. Test flight/simulation and qualitative studies consistently reported feasibility and positive bystander experiences. Computer/prediction models exhibited considerable heterogeneity, yet all indicated significant time savings for AED delivery compared to traditional EMS methods. Moreover, seven studies estimated improved survival rates, with five assessing cost-effectiveness and favouring drone systems. Regional factors such as EMS response times, volunteer responder programmes, terrain, weather, and budget constraints influenced the system's effectiveness.

Conclusion: Across all categories, studies confirmed the feasibility of drone-delivered AED systems, with significant potential for reducing time to AED arrival compared to EMS arrival. Prediction models suggested enhanced survival alongside costeffectiveness. Further research, including more extensive real-world studies and regulatory advancements, is imperative to integrate drones effectively into OHCA response systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为院外心脏骤停提供自动体外除颤器的无人机:范围审查。
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)仍然是一个严重的健康问题,其中及时获得自动体外除颤器(aed)可显着提高生存率。这篇范围综述广泛调查了无人机运送aed对OHCA响应的可行性和影响。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane和Web of Science从成立到2024年8月6日,检索范围广泛,包括经验数据。绘制图表的过程涉及为专题分析反复抽取数据。结果:我们确定了306个标题,经过重复删除、标题/摘要筛选和全文审查,包括39项研究。这些研究分为三类:1)真实世界观察研究(n = 3), 2)试飞/模拟研究和定性分析(n = 15),以及3)计算机/预测模型(n = 21)。现实世界的研究证明了无人机运送AED的可行性,在64- 67%的病例中,无人机比救护车的时间优势为01:52 - 03:14分钟。试飞/模拟和定性研究一致报告了可行性和积极的旁观者经验。计算机/预测模型显示出相当大的异质性,但所有模型都表明,与传统的EMS方法相比,AED交付时间显著节省。此外,有7项研究估计提高了存活率,其中5项研究评估了成本效益,并支持无人机系统。区域因素,如紧急医疗服务系统的响应时间、志愿救援计划、地形、天气和预算限制,都会影响系统的有效性。结论:在所有类别中,研究都证实了无人机交付AED系统的可行性,与EMS相比,无人机交付AED系统具有显著的缩短到达时间的潜力。预测模型显示,在提高成本效益的同时,生存率也有所提高。为了将无人机有效地整合到OHCA响应系统中,进一步的研究,包括更广泛的现实世界研究和监管进步,是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
In-hospital cardiac arrest in middle-income settings: A comprehensive analysis of clinical profiles and outcomes of both adults and pediatrics. Hand position during chest compression in infantile piglets - Do you need to encircle the chest with the 2-thumb-technique? ILCOR World Restart a Heart - Spreading global CPR awareness and empowering communities to save lives since 2018. Challenges during cardiac arrest in pregnancy. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Ireland 2012 to 2020: Bystander CPR, bystander defibrillation and survival in the Utstein comparator group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1