Cannabis use and alcohol-related outcomes among sober living house residents with alcohol use disorders

Meenakshi S. Subbaraman , Elizabeth Mahoney , Amy Mericle , Douglas Polcin
{"title":"Cannabis use and alcohol-related outcomes among sober living house residents with alcohol use disorders","authors":"Meenakshi S. Subbaraman ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Mahoney ,&nbsp;Amy Mericle ,&nbsp;Douglas Polcin","doi":"10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence supporting cannabis substitution along with liberalized cannabis laws have left recovery homes such as sober living houses (SLHs) in a difficult position regarding policies relating to cannabis use among SLH residents. Moreover, there are few studies of cannabis use among SLH residents that can be used to inform cannabis use policies. Here we assess whether cannabis is related to alcohol use among SLH residents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data came from N = 205 SLH residents entering 28 SLHs in Los Angeles from 2021 to 2023. Interviews were at baseline and one-, two-, three-, and six-month follow-ups. All participants reported lifetime alcohol use disorder (AUD). The primary predictor was any past 30-day cannabis use. Past 30-day outcomes were any drinking, number of drinking days, and any alcohol problems. Longitudinal generalized estimating equation models tested associations between any past-30-day cannabis use and outcomes, adjusting for demographics, treatment, 12-step attendance, social network use, baseline drug use, and AUD severity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After adjustment for demographics and covariates, any past-30-day cannabis use was related to 7.02 times higher odds of any past 30-day drinking (OR=7.02, 95 % CI: 3.06, 16.12), 2.03 times more drinking days (IRR=2.03, 95 % CI: 1.01, 4.08), and 3.21 times higher odds of any past-30-day alcohol problems (OR=3.21, 95 % CI: 1.68, 6.14) vs. no past-30-day cannabis use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cannabis use is positively correlated with alcohol use and related problems in a sample of sober living house residents in Los Angeles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72841,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772724624000969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Evidence supporting cannabis substitution along with liberalized cannabis laws have left recovery homes such as sober living houses (SLHs) in a difficult position regarding policies relating to cannabis use among SLH residents. Moreover, there are few studies of cannabis use among SLH residents that can be used to inform cannabis use policies. Here we assess whether cannabis is related to alcohol use among SLH residents.

Methods

Data came from N = 205 SLH residents entering 28 SLHs in Los Angeles from 2021 to 2023. Interviews were at baseline and one-, two-, three-, and six-month follow-ups. All participants reported lifetime alcohol use disorder (AUD). The primary predictor was any past 30-day cannabis use. Past 30-day outcomes were any drinking, number of drinking days, and any alcohol problems. Longitudinal generalized estimating equation models tested associations between any past-30-day cannabis use and outcomes, adjusting for demographics, treatment, 12-step attendance, social network use, baseline drug use, and AUD severity.

Results

After adjustment for demographics and covariates, any past-30-day cannabis use was related to 7.02 times higher odds of any past 30-day drinking (OR=7.02, 95 % CI: 3.06, 16.12), 2.03 times more drinking days (IRR=2.03, 95 % CI: 1.01, 4.08), and 3.21 times higher odds of any past-30-day alcohol problems (OR=3.21, 95 % CI: 1.68, 6.14) vs. no past-30-day cannabis use.

Conclusions

Cannabis use is positively correlated with alcohol use and related problems in a sample of sober living house residents in Los Angeles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有酒精使用障碍的清醒生活屋居民的大麻使用和酒精相关结果
背景:支持大麻替代的证据以及大麻法律的自由化使康复之家,如清醒生活之家(SLHs)在SLH居民中使用大麻的政策方面处于困难地位。此外,很少有关于SLH居民大麻使用的研究可以用来为大麻使用政策提供信息。在这里,我们评估大麻是否与SLH居民的酒精使用有关。方法:数据来自2021 - 2023年洛杉矶28家SLH的205名SLH居民。访谈是在基线和1个月、2个月、3个月和6个月的随访。所有参与者都报告了终生酒精使用障碍(AUD)。主要的预测因素是任何超过30天的大麻使用。过去30天的结果包括任何饮酒、饮酒天数和任何酒精问题。纵向广义估计方程模型测试了任何过去30天的大麻使用与结果之间的关联,调整了人口统计学、治疗、12步出勤、社交网络使用、基线药物使用和AUD严重程度。结果:在对人口统计学和协变量进行调整后,过去30天使用大麻与过去30天饮酒的几率(OR=7.02, 95% CI: 3.06, 16.12)、饮酒天数(IRR=2.03, 95% CI: 1.01, 4.08)和过去30天饮酒问题的几率(OR=3.21, 95% CI: 1.68, 6.14)相关,前者比后者高7.02倍。结论:大麻使用与酒精使用及相关问题在洛杉矶清醒生活屋居民样本中呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence reports
Drug and alcohol dependence reports Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
100 days
期刊最新文献
High-intensity interval training alleviates ethanol-induced renal damage: A study on inflammation, oxidative stress, and histopathological changes in rats Sex differences in normative modeling of cortical thickness in cannabis use disorder Association of safer smoking supply distribution with participant encounters and naloxone distribution from syringe services programs: Findings from the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs in the United States Predictors for recurrence of drug use among males on probation for methamphetamine use in Japan: a one-year follow-up study A mixed-methods investigation of an ecological momentary assessment protocol for cigarette-smoking youth: Psychometric properties and participant experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1