{"title":"Model-based variance partitioning for statistical ecology","authors":"Torsti Schulz, Marjo Saastamoinen, Jarno Vanhatalo","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Variance partitioning is a common tool for statistical analysis and interpretation in both observational and experimental studies in ecology. Its popularity has led to a proliferation of methods with sometimes confusing or contradicting interpretations. Here, we present variance partitioning in a model-based Bayesian framework as a general tool for summarizing and interpreting regression-like models to produce additional insight on ecological studies compared with what traditional parameter inference of these models on its own can reveal. For example, we propose predictive variance partitioning as a tool to extend sample-based analyses to analyses of whole populations or predictive scenarios. We also extend variance partitioning to encompass partitioning of variance within and between ecologically relevant subgroups of the observations, or the whole population of interest, to provide information on how the relative roles of processes underlying the study system may vary depending on the environmental or ecological context. We discuss the role of correlated covariates and random effects and highlight uncertainty quantification in variance partitioning. To showcase the utility of our approach, we present a case study comprising a simple occupancy model for a metapopulation of the Glanville fritillary butterfly. As a result, we demonstrate model-based variance partitioning as a general and rigorous statistical tool to gain more insight from ecological data.","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1646","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Variance partitioning is a common tool for statistical analysis and interpretation in both observational and experimental studies in ecology. Its popularity has led to a proliferation of methods with sometimes confusing or contradicting interpretations. Here, we present variance partitioning in a model-based Bayesian framework as a general tool for summarizing and interpreting regression-like models to produce additional insight on ecological studies compared with what traditional parameter inference of these models on its own can reveal. For example, we propose predictive variance partitioning as a tool to extend sample-based analyses to analyses of whole populations or predictive scenarios. We also extend variance partitioning to encompass partitioning of variance within and between ecologically relevant subgroups of the observations, or the whole population of interest, to provide information on how the relative roles of processes underlying the study system may vary depending on the environmental or ecological context. We discuss the role of correlated covariates and random effects and highlight uncertainty quantification in variance partitioning. To showcase the utility of our approach, we present a case study comprising a simple occupancy model for a metapopulation of the Glanville fritillary butterfly. As a result, we demonstrate model-based variance partitioning as a general and rigorous statistical tool to gain more insight from ecological data.
期刊介绍:
The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology.
Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message.
Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology.
Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions.
In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.