{"title":"The contribution of pollinator-mediated versus pollinator-independent interactions to plant reproduction","authors":"Aubrie R. M. James, Monica A. Geber","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pollinator-mediated and pollinator-independent interactions both affect plant reproductive success but are often studied independently. Evaluating the separate and cumulative effect of both types of interactions is necessary to understand population dynamics and species coexistence. Here, we ask how interactions during growth and flowering contribute to pollinator-mediated and pollinator-independent density dependence in components of reproduction and total fecundity in communities of <i>Clarkia</i> species. Using experimental plots embedded in natural communities of forbs and grasses, we examine the response of flower number, ovule number per flower, seed set (% of ovules in a fruit that are filled seed), and total fecundity (total seed number per plant) of focal plants of four <i>Clarkia</i> species to varying densities of background <i>Clarkia</i>, forbs, and grasses, with (control) or without supplemental pollination of focal flowers. A comparison of seed set and total fecundity between control and pollen-supplemented flowers provided an estimate of pollen limitation to reproduction, which was largely pollinator mediated in this study. Forbs and grasses exerted a density-dependent, pollinator-independent competitive effect on all reproductive components and on total fecundity. By contrast, interactions between focal and background <i>Clarkia</i> were entirely density-independent, pollinator-mediated, and affected only seed set. Pollinator-mediated effects on seed set between pairs of focal and background <i>Clarkia</i> species were largely competitive, and in line with the known pollination biology of <i>Clarkia</i> species. Our results point to the importance of evaluating pollinator-mediated interactions in the context of natural communities, and that pollinator-mediated interactions between <i>Clarkia</i> species, while strong, are not likely to affect population dynamics at the scale of the small local neighborhood but may do so at larger spatial and/or temporal scales.","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1649","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pollinator-mediated and pollinator-independent interactions both affect plant reproductive success but are often studied independently. Evaluating the separate and cumulative effect of both types of interactions is necessary to understand population dynamics and species coexistence. Here, we ask how interactions during growth and flowering contribute to pollinator-mediated and pollinator-independent density dependence in components of reproduction and total fecundity in communities of Clarkia species. Using experimental plots embedded in natural communities of forbs and grasses, we examine the response of flower number, ovule number per flower, seed set (% of ovules in a fruit that are filled seed), and total fecundity (total seed number per plant) of focal plants of four Clarkia species to varying densities of background Clarkia, forbs, and grasses, with (control) or without supplemental pollination of focal flowers. A comparison of seed set and total fecundity between control and pollen-supplemented flowers provided an estimate of pollen limitation to reproduction, which was largely pollinator mediated in this study. Forbs and grasses exerted a density-dependent, pollinator-independent competitive effect on all reproductive components and on total fecundity. By contrast, interactions between focal and background Clarkia were entirely density-independent, pollinator-mediated, and affected only seed set. Pollinator-mediated effects on seed set between pairs of focal and background Clarkia species were largely competitive, and in line with the known pollination biology of Clarkia species. Our results point to the importance of evaluating pollinator-mediated interactions in the context of natural communities, and that pollinator-mediated interactions between Clarkia species, while strong, are not likely to affect population dynamics at the scale of the small local neighborhood but may do so at larger spatial and/or temporal scales.
期刊介绍:
The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology.
Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message.
Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology.
Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions.
In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.