From structural listening to daydreaming: Listening modes influence the individual experience in live concerts

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 0 MUSIC Psychology of Music Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1177/03057356241310863
Christian Weining, Deborah Meier, Melanie Wald-Fuhrmann, Martin Tröndle
{"title":"From structural listening to daydreaming: Listening modes influence the individual experience in live concerts","authors":"Christian Weining, Deborah Meier, Melanie Wald-Fuhrmann, Martin Tröndle","doi":"10.1177/03057356241310863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Listening modes are often ignored in music perception research, especially when it comes to the supposedly attentive listening situation of a classical concert. The audience members’ various ways of listening, understood as the directedness of activity toward different dimensions of sound, is hypothesized to play a key role in the experience of live music. We assessed listening activity of participants ( N = 786) attending a series of experimental live concerts. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed the following five listening modes: emotional-immersive, structural, sound-causal, diffuse, and single-focused. Furthermore, listening modes significantly predicted affective states (positive activation, negative activation, and valence) after the concert. Results show that, despite music educational paradigms, structural listening increases negative activation, whereas emotional-immersive and sound-causal listening increase valence and lead to relaxation in a classical music performance. The results are in line with former empirical and theoretical taxonomies of listening modes and provide a new contribution to the understanding of the role of listening modes for the perception and aesthetic experience of music in live concerts and beyond.","PeriodicalId":47977,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Music","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Music","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356241310863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Listening modes are often ignored in music perception research, especially when it comes to the supposedly attentive listening situation of a classical concert. The audience members’ various ways of listening, understood as the directedness of activity toward different dimensions of sound, is hypothesized to play a key role in the experience of live music. We assessed listening activity of participants ( N = 786) attending a series of experimental live concerts. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed the following five listening modes: emotional-immersive, structural, sound-causal, diffuse, and single-focused. Furthermore, listening modes significantly predicted affective states (positive activation, negative activation, and valence) after the concert. Results show that, despite music educational paradigms, structural listening increases negative activation, whereas emotional-immersive and sound-causal listening increase valence and lead to relaxation in a classical music performance. The results are in line with former empirical and theoretical taxonomies of listening modes and provide a new contribution to the understanding of the role of listening modes for the perception and aesthetic experience of music in live concerts and beyond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从结构聆听到白日梦:聆听模式影响现场音乐会的个人体验
在音乐感知的研究中,听觉模式往往被忽视,尤其是在古典音乐会中所谓的专心聆听的情况下。观众的各种聆听方式,被理解为对不同声音维度的活动的方向性,被假设在现场音乐的体验中起着关键作用。我们评估了参加一系列实验性现场音乐会的参与者(N = 786)的听力活动。探索性因素分析(EFA)揭示了五种倾听模式:情绪沉浸式、结构式、声音因果式、漫反射式和单一聚焦式。此外,聆听方式显著预测音乐会后的情感状态(积极激活、消极激活和效价)。结果表明,在古典音乐演奏中,尽管存在音乐教育范式,但结构性聆听会增加负激活,而情感沉浸式聆听和声音因果式聆听则会增加效价并导致放松。研究结果与以往的听觉模式的经验和理论分类一致,并为理解听觉模式在现场音乐会及其他场合对音乐的感知和审美体验中的作用提供了新的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
17.60%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Psychology of Music and SEMPRE provide an international forum for researchers working in the fields of psychology of music and music education, to encourage the exchange of ideas and to disseminate research findings. Psychology of Music publishes peer-reviewed papers directed at increasing the scientific understanding of any psychological aspect of music. These include studies on listening, performing, creating, memorising, analysing, describing, learning, and teaching, as well as applied social, developmental, attitudinal and therapeutic studies. Special emphasis is placed on studies carried out in naturalistic settings, especially those which address the interface between music psychology and music education.
期刊最新文献
A new look at the potential links between music practice, empathy, and prosociality Beat perception in polyrhythms is influenced by spontaneous motor tempo, musicianship, and played musical style Spontaneous motor tempo modulates the effect of music tempo on arousal levels Thank you for the music: Music as a social surrogate that protects against social threats Meta-analysis on the effects of music participation on social and emotional measures across the lifespan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1