{"title":"Comparing structural policies for relieving citywide traffic congestion: longitudinal evidence from 96 Chinese cities","authors":"Chengcheng Liu, Wenjia Zhang, Nuoxian Huang","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10577-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anti-congestion policies, such as urban spatial planning, transport infrastructure, and economic incentives, are often regarded as effective structural measures for relieving citywide traffic congestion. However, few studies have empirically investigated and compared the intervention effects of such structural policies on relieving congestion. Using longitudinal AutoNavi’s big-data-based congestion delay index from 96 congested Chinese cities, we developed panel regression models with random effects to estimate the impact of four types of structural determinants on traffic congestion, including fuel price, road construction, public transportation, and urban spatial characteristics. The empirical results demonstrate that (1) the impacts of urban spatial characteristics and public transportation outweigh the impacts of fuel price and road construction on traffic congestion in terms of significance level and quantity; and (2) higher gasoline prices, road length and capacity expansion, a polycentric urban structure, and mixed land use contribute to alleviating traffic congestion. These findings enable a systematic understanding of the determinants of traffic congestion and provide policy implications in the context of developing countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10577-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Anti-congestion policies, such as urban spatial planning, transport infrastructure, and economic incentives, are often regarded as effective structural measures for relieving citywide traffic congestion. However, few studies have empirically investigated and compared the intervention effects of such structural policies on relieving congestion. Using longitudinal AutoNavi’s big-data-based congestion delay index from 96 congested Chinese cities, we developed panel regression models with random effects to estimate the impact of four types of structural determinants on traffic congestion, including fuel price, road construction, public transportation, and urban spatial characteristics. The empirical results demonstrate that (1) the impacts of urban spatial characteristics and public transportation outweigh the impacts of fuel price and road construction on traffic congestion in terms of significance level and quantity; and (2) higher gasoline prices, road length and capacity expansion, a polycentric urban structure, and mixed land use contribute to alleviating traffic congestion. These findings enable a systematic understanding of the determinants of traffic congestion and provide policy implications in the context of developing countries.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.