Comparing structural policies for relieving citywide traffic congestion: longitudinal evidence from 96 Chinese cities

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1007/s11116-024-10577-3
Chengcheng Liu, Wenjia Zhang, Nuoxian Huang
{"title":"Comparing structural policies for relieving citywide traffic congestion: longitudinal evidence from 96 Chinese cities","authors":"Chengcheng Liu, Wenjia Zhang, Nuoxian Huang","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10577-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anti-congestion policies, such as urban spatial planning, transport infrastructure, and economic incentives, are often regarded as effective structural measures for relieving citywide traffic congestion. However, few studies have empirically investigated and compared the intervention effects of such structural policies on relieving congestion. Using longitudinal AutoNavi’s big-data-based congestion delay index from 96 congested Chinese cities, we developed panel regression models with random effects to estimate the impact of four types of structural determinants on traffic congestion, including fuel price, road construction, public transportation, and urban spatial characteristics. The empirical results demonstrate that (1) the impacts of urban spatial characteristics and public transportation outweigh the impacts of fuel price and road construction on traffic congestion in terms of significance level and quantity; and (2) higher gasoline prices, road length and capacity expansion, a polycentric urban structure, and mixed land use contribute to alleviating traffic congestion. These findings enable a systematic understanding of the determinants of traffic congestion and provide policy implications in the context of developing countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10577-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anti-congestion policies, such as urban spatial planning, transport infrastructure, and economic incentives, are often regarded as effective structural measures for relieving citywide traffic congestion. However, few studies have empirically investigated and compared the intervention effects of such structural policies on relieving congestion. Using longitudinal AutoNavi’s big-data-based congestion delay index from 96 congested Chinese cities, we developed panel regression models with random effects to estimate the impact of four types of structural determinants on traffic congestion, including fuel price, road construction, public transportation, and urban spatial characteristics. The empirical results demonstrate that (1) the impacts of urban spatial characteristics and public transportation outweigh the impacts of fuel price and road construction on traffic congestion in terms of significance level and quantity; and (2) higher gasoline prices, road length and capacity expansion, a polycentric urban structure, and mixed land use contribute to alleviating traffic congestion. These findings enable a systematic understanding of the determinants of traffic congestion and provide policy implications in the context of developing countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缓解城市交通拥堵的结构性政策比较:来自96个中国城市的纵向证据
反拥堵政策,如城市空间规划、交通基础设施和经济激励措施,通常被视为缓解全市交通拥堵的有效结构性措施。然而,很少有研究对此类结构性政策在缓解交通拥堵方面的干预效果进行实证调查和比较。利用基于大数据的高德纵向拥堵延时指数,我们建立了96个中国拥堵城市的随机效应面板回归模型,估计了油价、道路建设、公共交通和城市空间特征等四类结构性决定因素对交通拥堵的影响。实证结果表明:(1) 从显著性水平和数量上看,城市空间特征和公共交通对交通拥堵的影响大于燃油价格和道路建设对交通拥堵的影响;(2) 较高的汽油价格、道路长度和容量扩张、多中心城市结构以及土地混合使用有助于缓解交通拥堵。这些研究结果有助于系统地了解交通拥堵的决定因素,并为发展中国家提供了政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
Identification and investigation of cruising speeds from cycling GPS data Beyond metros: pollution mitigation and environmental benefits in diverse transit systems Pffm-se: a passenger flow forecasting model for urban rail transit based on multimodal fusion of AFC and social media sentiment under special events Calibration of vehicular traffic simulation models by local optimization Agent-based modelling of older adult needs for autonomous mobility-on-demand: a case study in Winnipeg, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1