Eliseth Ribeiro Leão , Roberta Maria Savieto , Gustavo Benvenutti Borba , Elivane da Silva Victor , Sabrina Bortolossi Bomfim , Erika Hingst-Zaher , Luciano Moreira Lima , Luccas Guilherme Rodrigues Longo , Leticia Bernardes de Oliveira , Denise Tiemi Noguchi , Lucas Pires Garcia Oliveira , Rafael Facure Moredo , Clarissa de Oliveira Santos , André Menini , Lital Moro Bass , Karina Pavão Patrício , Giulia Catissi , João Marcos Rosa , Emerson Barão Rodrigues Soldado , Floriana Bertini , Edgard Joseph Kiriyama
{"title":"Efficacy of a multicomponent nature-based intervention on well-being and environmental engagement: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Eliseth Ribeiro Leão , Roberta Maria Savieto , Gustavo Benvenutti Borba , Elivane da Silva Victor , Sabrina Bortolossi Bomfim , Erika Hingst-Zaher , Luciano Moreira Lima , Luccas Guilherme Rodrigues Longo , Leticia Bernardes de Oliveira , Denise Tiemi Noguchi , Lucas Pires Garcia Oliveira , Rafael Facure Moredo , Clarissa de Oliveira Santos , André Menini , Lital Moro Bass , Karina Pavão Patrício , Giulia Catissi , João Marcos Rosa , Emerson Barão Rodrigues Soldado , Floriana Bertini , Edgard Joseph Kiriyama","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2025.109286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Nature-based interventions (NBIs) benefit human well-being, but clinical trials comparing different NBIs in various natural environments are scarce.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent nature-based intervention (MNBI) in comparison to control group (classical forest bathing). Primary outcome: well-being; Secondary outcomes: vitality, happiness, connection, and engagement with nature across urban, <em>peri</em>-urban, and rural areas.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Randomized clinical trial with 486 participants between October/2022 and June/2023, from five natural areas in Southeast and Southern/Brazil. Well-being was assessed immediately before the activity and 30 days after, and secondary outcomes immediately before, immediately after and 30 days after. The data analyses considered a 95 % confidence interval and p-values < 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The main hypothesis was confirmed, well-being levels of MNBI group were significantly improved, especially in <em>peri</em>-urban areas (p = 0.036). Both groups increased vitality (p < 0.001), but MNBI was more effective overall (p = 0.038), especially in urban areas (p = 0.020). Happiness increased in both groups (p = 0.001), but MNBI participants maintained higher levels 30 days post-intervention (p = 0.010). Nature connection increased significantly in both groups (p < 0.001) but remained higher in MNBI after 30 days (p = 0.021), especially in <em>peri</em>-urban areas (p = 0.034). While both groups reported calm and relaxation, MNBI uniquely fostered learning, knowledge, and contemplation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MNBI was more effective than classical forest bathing in improving well-being, nature connection and pro-environmental behaviors, particularly in <em>peri</em>-urban settings, expanding the potential of NBIs for well-being promotion. ClinicalTrials registration: NCT05486156.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":308,"journal":{"name":"Environment International","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 109286"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment International","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412025000376","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Nature-based interventions (NBIs) benefit human well-being, but clinical trials comparing different NBIs in various natural environments are scarce.
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent nature-based intervention (MNBI) in comparison to control group (classical forest bathing). Primary outcome: well-being; Secondary outcomes: vitality, happiness, connection, and engagement with nature across urban, peri-urban, and rural areas.
Methods
Randomized clinical trial with 486 participants between October/2022 and June/2023, from five natural areas in Southeast and Southern/Brazil. Well-being was assessed immediately before the activity and 30 days after, and secondary outcomes immediately before, immediately after and 30 days after. The data analyses considered a 95 % confidence interval and p-values < 0.05.
Results
The main hypothesis was confirmed, well-being levels of MNBI group were significantly improved, especially in peri-urban areas (p = 0.036). Both groups increased vitality (p < 0.001), but MNBI was more effective overall (p = 0.038), especially in urban areas (p = 0.020). Happiness increased in both groups (p = 0.001), but MNBI participants maintained higher levels 30 days post-intervention (p = 0.010). Nature connection increased significantly in both groups (p < 0.001) but remained higher in MNBI after 30 days (p = 0.021), especially in peri-urban areas (p = 0.034). While both groups reported calm and relaxation, MNBI uniquely fostered learning, knowledge, and contemplation.
Conclusions
MNBI was more effective than classical forest bathing in improving well-being, nature connection and pro-environmental behaviors, particularly in peri-urban settings, expanding the potential of NBIs for well-being promotion. ClinicalTrials registration: NCT05486156.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Health publishes manuscripts focusing on critical aspects of environmental and occupational medicine, including studies in toxicology and epidemiology, to illuminate the human health implications of exposure to environmental hazards. The journal adopts an open-access model and practices open peer review.
It caters to scientists and practitioners across all environmental science domains, directly or indirectly impacting human health and well-being. With a commitment to enhancing the prevention of environmentally-related health risks, Environmental Health serves as a public health journal for the community and scientists engaged in matters of public health significance concerning the environment.