Differential impacts of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia on the mesoscale functional organization of the human visual cortex.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1523/jneurosci.0745-24.2024
Shahin Nasr,Jan Skerswetat,Eric D Gaier,Sarala N Malladi,Bryan Kennedy,Roger B H Tootell,Peter Bex,David G Hunter
{"title":"Differential impacts of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia on the mesoscale functional organization of the human visual cortex.","authors":"Shahin Nasr,Jan Skerswetat,Eric D Gaier,Sarala N Malladi,Bryan Kennedy,Roger B H Tootell,Peter Bex,David G Hunter","doi":"10.1523/jneurosci.0745-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We employed high-resolution fMRI to distinguish the impacts of anisometropia and strabismus amblyopia on the evoked ocular dominance (OD) response. Sixteen amblyopic participants (8 females) plus 8 individuals with normal vision (1 female), participated in this study for whom, we measured the difference between the response to stimulation of the two eyes, across areas V1-V4.In controls, the evoked OD response formed the expected striped pattern within V1. Compared to controls, the OD response in amblyopic participants formed larger fused patches that extended into downstream visual areas. Moreover, both anisometropic and strabismic participants showed elevated OD responses across V1-V4.Beyond these common effects, and despite similar densities of amblyopia between the two groups, strabismus and anisometropia had differential impacts on the OD bias, binocular response and correlation between V1 depth levels. Specifically, we found a greater increase in the size of V1 portion that responded preferentially to fellow eye stimulation in anisometropic compared to strabismic individuals. We also found a greater difference between the amplitudes of the response to binocular stimulation, in those regions that responded preferentially to the fellow vs. amblyopic eye, in anisometropic compared to strabismic participants. In contrast, strabismic participants demonstrated increased correlation between the OD responses evoked within V1 superficial and deep depths, whereas anisometropic individuals did not.These results provide the primary direct functional evidence for distinct impacts of strabismus and anisometropia on the mesoscale functional organization of the human visual system, thus extending what was inferred previously about amblyopia from animal models.Significance Statement Amblyopia is a developmental disorder caused by perturbations to normal binocular visual experience during the critical period impact. Despite its high prevalence, our current understanding of amblyopia impacts on the mesoscale functional organization of primary visual area (V1) is mostly based on invasive techniques in animals. In this study we showed the primary direct evidence for the distinct impacts of anisometropia versus strabismus (two major causes of amblyopia) on the fMRI activity evoked within the human visual cortex. Our findings also confirmed the hypothesized link between the evoked OD response and the interocular visual acuity difference in amblyopia.","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"4 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0745-24.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We employed high-resolution fMRI to distinguish the impacts of anisometropia and strabismus amblyopia on the evoked ocular dominance (OD) response. Sixteen amblyopic participants (8 females) plus 8 individuals with normal vision (1 female), participated in this study for whom, we measured the difference between the response to stimulation of the two eyes, across areas V1-V4.In controls, the evoked OD response formed the expected striped pattern within V1. Compared to controls, the OD response in amblyopic participants formed larger fused patches that extended into downstream visual areas. Moreover, both anisometropic and strabismic participants showed elevated OD responses across V1-V4.Beyond these common effects, and despite similar densities of amblyopia between the two groups, strabismus and anisometropia had differential impacts on the OD bias, binocular response and correlation between V1 depth levels. Specifically, we found a greater increase in the size of V1 portion that responded preferentially to fellow eye stimulation in anisometropic compared to strabismic individuals. We also found a greater difference between the amplitudes of the response to binocular stimulation, in those regions that responded preferentially to the fellow vs. amblyopic eye, in anisometropic compared to strabismic participants. In contrast, strabismic participants demonstrated increased correlation between the OD responses evoked within V1 superficial and deep depths, whereas anisometropic individuals did not.These results provide the primary direct functional evidence for distinct impacts of strabismus and anisometropia on the mesoscale functional organization of the human visual system, thus extending what was inferred previously about amblyopia from animal models.Significance Statement Amblyopia is a developmental disorder caused by perturbations to normal binocular visual experience during the critical period impact. Despite its high prevalence, our current understanding of amblyopia impacts on the mesoscale functional organization of primary visual area (V1) is mostly based on invasive techniques in animals. In this study we showed the primary direct evidence for the distinct impacts of anisometropia versus strabismus (two major causes of amblyopia) on the fMRI activity evoked within the human visual cortex. Our findings also confirmed the hypothesized link between the evoked OD response and the interocular visual acuity difference in amblyopia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斜视和屈光参差弱视对人类视觉皮层中尺度功能组织的不同影响。
我们采用高分辨率的功能磁共振成像来区分参差和斜视弱视对诱发的眼优势反应的影响。16名弱视受试者(8名女性)和8名视力正常的受试者(1名女性)参加了这项研究,我们测量了他们两只眼睛V1-V4区域对刺激的反应差异。在对照组中,诱发的OD反应在V1内形成了预期的条纹模式。与对照组相比,弱视参与者的OD反应形成了更大的融合斑块,延伸到下游视觉区域。此外,参差和斜视参与者在V1-V4的OD反应均升高。除了这些共同的影响之外,尽管两组弱视的密度相似,但斜视和屈光参差对视距偏差、双眼反应和V1深度水平相关性的影响是不同的。具体来说,我们发现,与斜视患者相比,各向异性患者V1部分的大小增加更大,V1部分优先响应同伴眼睛刺激。我们还发现,与斜视受试者相比,在那些优先对弱视受试者做出反应的区域,对双眼刺激的反应幅度存在更大的差异。相比之下,斜视受试者在V1浅层和深层诱发的OD反应之间表现出增加的相关性,而各向异性受试者则没有。这些结果为斜视和屈光参差对人类视觉系统中尺度功能组织的不同影响提供了主要的直接功能证据,从而扩展了先前从动物模型中推断的弱视。弱视是一种发育障碍,是由于正常双眼视觉体验在关键期受到干扰而引起的。尽管弱视的发病率很高,但我们目前对弱视对初级视觉区(V1)中尺度功能组织的影响的了解主要是基于动物的侵入性技术。在这项研究中,我们展示了屈光参差和斜视(弱视的两个主要原因)对人类视觉皮层内诱发的fMRI活动的不同影响的主要直接证据。我们的研究结果也证实了弱视诱发的OD反应与眼间视力差异之间的假设联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
期刊最新文献
Corticotropin-releasing factor and somatostatin neurons in the central amygdala mediate dynamic defensive behaviors during fear extinction. The Parafascicular Role in Updating Action from a Spatial to a Visual Strategy is Driven by its Glutamatergic Mesencephalic Locomotor Region inputs. Listening to a consonant chord progression during live face-to-face gaze enhances neural activity in social systems. Post-Ictal Sleep Changes in Human Focal Epilepsy. Critical Dynamics in the Association Cortex Predict Higher Intelligence in Typically Developing Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1