Alice L Zhou,Armaan F Akbar,Alexandra A Rizaldi,Jessica M Ruck,Emily L Larson,Sorush Rokui,Dane C Paneitz,Elizabeth A King,Ahmet Kilic
{"title":"New Kidney-After-Heart Allocation Policy in the United States: Who would benefit from a rescue kidney?","authors":"Alice L Zhou,Armaan F Akbar,Alexandra A Rizaldi,Jessica M Ruck,Emily L Larson,Sorush Rokui,Dane C Paneitz,Elizabeth A King,Ahmet Kilic","doi":"10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThe new rescue kidney policy in the United States was implemented in June 2023. To estimate its potential impact, we investigated a historic cohort of heart transplant (HT) recipients who would have been eligible for a kidney-after-heart transplant under this policy.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAdult heart-only recipients from 1/1/2000 to 3/31/2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized by retroactively applying eligibility criteria from the new policy: eGFR≤20mL/min, CrCl≤20mL/min, or dialysis 60-365 days post-HT. We evaluated outcomes of eligible recipients.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 45,833 HT recipients, 840 (1.8%) were eligible for a rescue kidney. Eligible recipients had higher median age (58 vs. 56 years, p<0.001) and serum creatinine (1.4 vs. 1.2, p<0.001), and were more likely to be status 1A in the pre-2018 allocation era (63.4% vs. 51.9%, p<0.001) and status 1 in the post-2018 allocation era (13.9% vs. 9.1%, p=0.003). Survival at 1 year conditional on 60-day survival was worse for eligible recipients (50.8% vs. 96.3%; HR 17.6 [95%CI: 15.8-19.6], p<0.001). Post-HT, 607 (72.3%) eligible recipients were never listed for kidney transplant (KT), of whom 486 (80.1%) died with a median time-to-death of 8.8 months. Among the 233 (27.7%) recipients listed for KT, 65 (27.9%) died/deteriorated on the waitlist and 99 (42.5%) received a KT (median 38.4 months post-HT).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nHalf of recipients eligible for a rescue kidney did not survive to 1 year post-HT, and >70% were never listed for KT. The effects of the new policy on mitigating mortality in this challenging population will be paramount.","PeriodicalId":22654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2025.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE
The new rescue kidney policy in the United States was implemented in June 2023. To estimate its potential impact, we investigated a historic cohort of heart transplant (HT) recipients who would have been eligible for a kidney-after-heart transplant under this policy.
METHODS
Adult heart-only recipients from 1/1/2000 to 3/31/2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized by retroactively applying eligibility criteria from the new policy: eGFR≤20mL/min, CrCl≤20mL/min, or dialysis 60-365 days post-HT. We evaluated outcomes of eligible recipients.
RESULTS
Of 45,833 HT recipients, 840 (1.8%) were eligible for a rescue kidney. Eligible recipients had higher median age (58 vs. 56 years, p<0.001) and serum creatinine (1.4 vs. 1.2, p<0.001), and were more likely to be status 1A in the pre-2018 allocation era (63.4% vs. 51.9%, p<0.001) and status 1 in the post-2018 allocation era (13.9% vs. 9.1%, p=0.003). Survival at 1 year conditional on 60-day survival was worse for eligible recipients (50.8% vs. 96.3%; HR 17.6 [95%CI: 15.8-19.6], p<0.001). Post-HT, 607 (72.3%) eligible recipients were never listed for kidney transplant (KT), of whom 486 (80.1%) died with a median time-to-death of 8.8 months. Among the 233 (27.7%) recipients listed for KT, 65 (27.9%) died/deteriorated on the waitlist and 99 (42.5%) received a KT (median 38.4 months post-HT).
CONCLUSIONS
Half of recipients eligible for a rescue kidney did not survive to 1 year post-HT, and >70% were never listed for KT. The effects of the new policy on mitigating mortality in this challenging population will be paramount.