Stable Soil Biota Network Enhances Soil Multifunctionality in Agroecosystems

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Change Biology Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1111/gcb.70041
Xianwen Long, Jiangnan Li, Xionghui Liao, Jiachen Wang, Wei Zhang, Kelin Wang, Jie Zhao
{"title":"Stable Soil Biota Network Enhances Soil Multifunctionality in Agroecosystems","authors":"Xianwen Long, Jiangnan Li, Xionghui Liao, Jiachen Wang, Wei Zhang, Kelin Wang, Jie Zhao","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unraveling how agricultural management practices affect soil biota network complexity and stability and how these changes relate to soil processes and functions is critical for the development of sustainable agriculture. However, our understanding of these knowledge still remains unclear. Here, we explored the effects of soil management intensity on soil biota network complexity, stability, and soil multifunctionality, as well as the relationships among these factors. Four typical land use types representing a gradient of disturbance intensity were selected in calcareous and red soils in southwest China. The four land use types with increasing disturbance intensity included pasture, sugarcane farmland, rice paddy fields, and maize cropland. The network cohesion, the network topological features (e.g., average degree, average clustering coefficient, average path length, network diameter, graph density, and modularity), and the average variation degree were used to evaluate the strength of interactions between species, soil biota network complexity, and the network stability, respectively. The results showed that intensive soil management increased species competition and soil biota network complexity but decreased soil biota network stability. Soil microfauna (e.g., nematode, protozoa, and arthropoda) stabilized the entire soil biota network through top-down control. Soil biota network stability rather than soil biota network complexity or soil biodiversity predicted the dynamics of soil multifunctionality. Specifically, stable soil communities, in both the entire soil biota network and selected soil organism groups (e.g., archaea, bacteria, fungi, arthropoda, nematode, protozoa, viridiplantae, and viruses), support high soil multifunctionality. In particular, soil microfauna stability had more contributions to soil multifunctionality than the stability of soil microbial communities. This result was further supported by network analysis, which showed that modules 1 and 4 had greater numbers of soil microfauna species and explained more variation of soil multifunctionality. Our study highlights that soil biota network stability should be considered a key factor in improving agricultural sustainability and crop productivity in the context of increasing global agricultural intensification.","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unraveling how agricultural management practices affect soil biota network complexity and stability and how these changes relate to soil processes and functions is critical for the development of sustainable agriculture. However, our understanding of these knowledge still remains unclear. Here, we explored the effects of soil management intensity on soil biota network complexity, stability, and soil multifunctionality, as well as the relationships among these factors. Four typical land use types representing a gradient of disturbance intensity were selected in calcareous and red soils in southwest China. The four land use types with increasing disturbance intensity included pasture, sugarcane farmland, rice paddy fields, and maize cropland. The network cohesion, the network topological features (e.g., average degree, average clustering coefficient, average path length, network diameter, graph density, and modularity), and the average variation degree were used to evaluate the strength of interactions between species, soil biota network complexity, and the network stability, respectively. The results showed that intensive soil management increased species competition and soil biota network complexity but decreased soil biota network stability. Soil microfauna (e.g., nematode, protozoa, and arthropoda) stabilized the entire soil biota network through top-down control. Soil biota network stability rather than soil biota network complexity or soil biodiversity predicted the dynamics of soil multifunctionality. Specifically, stable soil communities, in both the entire soil biota network and selected soil organism groups (e.g., archaea, bacteria, fungi, arthropoda, nematode, protozoa, viridiplantae, and viruses), support high soil multifunctionality. In particular, soil microfauna stability had more contributions to soil multifunctionality than the stability of soil microbial communities. This result was further supported by network analysis, which showed that modules 1 and 4 had greater numbers of soil microfauna species and explained more variation of soil multifunctionality. Our study highlights that soil biota network stability should be considered a key factor in improving agricultural sustainability and crop productivity in the context of increasing global agricultural intensification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳定的土壤生物群网络增强土壤在农业生态系统中的多功能性
揭示农业管理实践如何影响土壤生物群网络的复杂性和稳定性,以及这些变化如何与土壤过程和功能相关,对于可持续农业的发展至关重要。然而,我们对这些知识的理解仍然不清楚。本文探讨了土壤管理强度对土壤生物群网络复杂性、稳定性和土壤多功能性的影响,以及这些因素之间的关系。选取了代表扰动强度梯度的4种典型土地利用类型。干扰强度增加的4种土地利用类型依次为牧场、甘蔗田、稻田和玉米田。利用网络内聚性、网络拓扑特征(如平均度、平均聚类系数、平均路径长度、网络直径、图密度和模块化)和平均变异度分别评价物种间相互作用强度、土壤生物群网络复杂性和网络稳定性。结果表明,土壤集约管理增加了物种竞争和土壤生物群网络复杂性,但降低了土壤生物群网络的稳定性。土壤微动物(如线虫、原生动物和节肢动物)通过自上而下的控制稳定了整个土壤生物群网络。土壤生物群网络的稳定性而不是土壤生物群网络复杂性或土壤生物多样性预测土壤多功能性的动态。具体来说,稳定的土壤群落,无论是在整个土壤生物群网络中,还是在选定的土壤生物类群中(如古细菌、细菌、真菌、节肢动物、线虫、原生动物、病毒和病毒),都支持土壤的高度多功能性。土壤微动物稳定性对土壤多功能性的贡献大于微生物群落稳定性。网络分析进一步支持了这一结果,表明模块1和模块4具有更多的土壤微动物种类,解释了更多的土壤多功能性变化。我们的研究强调,在全球农业集约化的背景下,土壤生物群网络的稳定性应被视为提高农业可持续性和作物生产力的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
期刊最新文献
Overcoming Shifting Baselines: Paleo-Behaviour Reveals Industrial Revolution as Tipping Point Paleoecology Perspectives for Planetary Health The Interactive Role of Climatic Transfer Distance and Overstory Retention on Douglas-Fir Seedling Survival and Height Growth in Interior British Columbia Vegetation Types Shift Physiological and Phenological Controls on Carbon Sink Strength in a Coastal Zone Persistent Effects of Landscape Context on Recruitment Dynamics During Secondary Succession of Tropical Forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1