Mohammad Jad Moussa, Georges C. Tabet, Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, Lianchun Xiao, Nathaniel R. Wilson, Jianjun Gao, Christopher J. Logothetis, Petros Grivas, Byron Lee, Amishi Y. Shah, Pavlos Msaouel, Roger Li, Leticia Campos Clemente, Jianping Zhao, Nizar M. Tannir, Ashish M. Kamat, Donna E. Hansel, Charles C. Guo, Matthew T. Campbell, Omar Alhalabi
{"title":"Histopathologic Progression and Metastatic Relapse Outcomes in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Urinary Tract","authors":"Mohammad Jad Moussa, Georges C. Tabet, Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke, Lianchun Xiao, Nathaniel R. Wilson, Jianjun Gao, Christopher J. Logothetis, Petros Grivas, Byron Lee, Amishi Y. Shah, Pavlos Msaouel, Roger Li, Leticia Campos Clemente, Jianping Zhao, Nizar M. Tannir, Ashish M. Kamat, Donna E. Hansel, Charles C. Guo, Matthew T. Campbell, Omar Alhalabi","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCNEC-URO) has an inferior prognosis compared to conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, we evaluate the predictors and patterns of relapse after surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified a definitive-surgery cohort (<i>n</i> = 224) from an institutional database of patients with cT1-T4NxM0 SCNEC-URO treated in 1985–2021. Histopathologic review was conducted by independent pathologists. Relapse event was the time-to-event outcome, and relapse probabilities were estimated using a competing risk method with cumulative incidence functions (CIFs). Fine-Gray distribution models assessed covariate associations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most patients (161, 71.9%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX). Ninety two (41%) patients had relapse with 77 (83.7%) having distant organs as first metastatic sites, including 10 (10.9%) with exclusive central nervous system (CNS) metastases, mostly (9/10) within 1 year of surgery. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoCTx had the lowest 5-year CIF (16.5% [95% CI 9.3%–25.6%]). Patients with remaining exclusively small cell (SC) histology had the highest CIF (85.7% [95% CI 46.6–96.9]). Patients with eradicated SCNEC but remaining UC components had an intermediate-risk CIF (32.5% [95% CI 18.6–47.2]). Multivariable analysis adjusting for neoCTx, clinical stage at diagnosis (T3/4, N0/N+ vs. T1/T2, N0), and pathologic stage (pN+ vs. pN0) demonstrated that any SCNEC histology at resection (vs. pCR) was associated with relapse risk (hazard ratio = 3.69 [95% CI 1.91–7.13], <i>p</i> = 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>SCNEC-URO is a systemic disease with high risk of distant relapse including CNS. Our findings highlight unmet needs for neoadjuvant/adjuvant approaches targeting the rare SCNEC subtype and suggest adding CNS surveillance within the first year after definitive surgery to high-risk patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Précis (Condensed Abstract)</h3>\n \n <p>Alongside neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cancer stage, histology at resection strongly impacts relapse risk in small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary tract. The incidence of brain metastasis is notably higher than in “traditional” urothelial cancer within the first year after surgery, especially if small cell cancer persists, thus necessitating close neurological monitoring during this period.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70594","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary tract (SCNEC-URO) has an inferior prognosis compared to conventional urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, we evaluate the predictors and patterns of relapse after surgery.
Materials and Methods
We identified a definitive-surgery cohort (n = 224) from an institutional database of patients with cT1-T4NxM0 SCNEC-URO treated in 1985–2021. Histopathologic review was conducted by independent pathologists. Relapse event was the time-to-event outcome, and relapse probabilities were estimated using a competing risk method with cumulative incidence functions (CIFs). Fine-Gray distribution models assessed covariate associations.
Results
Most patients (161, 71.9%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCTX). Ninety two (41%) patients had relapse with 77 (83.7%) having distant organs as first metastatic sites, including 10 (10.9%) with exclusive central nervous system (CNS) metastases, mostly (9/10) within 1 year of surgery. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoCTx had the lowest 5-year CIF (16.5% [95% CI 9.3%–25.6%]). Patients with remaining exclusively small cell (SC) histology had the highest CIF (85.7% [95% CI 46.6–96.9]). Patients with eradicated SCNEC but remaining UC components had an intermediate-risk CIF (32.5% [95% CI 18.6–47.2]). Multivariable analysis adjusting for neoCTx, clinical stage at diagnosis (T3/4, N0/N+ vs. T1/T2, N0), and pathologic stage (pN+ vs. pN0) demonstrated that any SCNEC histology at resection (vs. pCR) was associated with relapse risk (hazard ratio = 3.69 [95% CI 1.91–7.13], p = 0.0001).
Conclusions
SCNEC-URO is a systemic disease with high risk of distant relapse including CNS. Our findings highlight unmet needs for neoadjuvant/adjuvant approaches targeting the rare SCNEC subtype and suggest adding CNS surveillance within the first year after definitive surgery to high-risk patients.
Précis (Condensed Abstract)
Alongside neoadjuvant chemotherapy and cancer stage, histology at resection strongly impacts relapse risk in small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the urinary tract. The incidence of brain metastasis is notably higher than in “traditional” urothelial cancer within the first year after surgery, especially if small cell cancer persists, thus necessitating close neurological monitoring during this period.
导言:泌尿道小细胞神经内分泌癌(SCNEC-URO)与常规尿路上皮癌(UC)相比预后较差。在这里,我们评估手术后复发的预测因素和模式。材料和方法:我们从1985-2021年治疗的cT1-T4NxM0 SCNEC-URO患者的机构数据库中确定了一个明确的手术队列(n = 224)。组织病理学检查由独立病理学家进行。复发事件是时间到事件的结果,复发概率使用具有累积发生率函数(CIFs)的竞争风险方法估计。细灰色分布模型评估协变量关联。结果:大多数患者(161例,71.9%)接受了新辅助化疗(neoCTX)。92例(41%)患者复发,77例(83.7%)患者首发转移部位为远端器官,其中10例(10.9%)患者仅为中枢神经系统(CNS)转移,多数(9/10)在手术1年内。neoCTx术后病理完全缓解(pCR)患者5年CIF最低(16.5% [95% CI 9.3%-25.6%])。仅剩小细胞(SC)组织学的患者CIF最高(85.7% [95% CI 46.6-96.9])。SCNEC根除但UC成分残留的患者有中等风险的CIF (32.5% [95% CI 18.6-47.2])。调整neoCTx、诊断时的临床分期(T3/4, N0/N+ vs. T1/T2, N0)和病理分期(pN+ vs. pN0)的多变量分析表明,任何SCNEC切除术时的组织学(vs. pCR)与复发风险相关(风险比= 3.69 [95% CI 1.91-7.13], p = 0.0001)。结论:SCNEC-URO是一种包括中枢神经系统在内的远处复发风险高的全身性疾病。我们的研究结果强调了针对罕见SCNEC亚型的新辅助/辅助方法的未满足需求,并建议在确定手术后的第一年对高危患者增加中枢神经系统监测。PRÉCIS(摘要):除了新辅助化疗和癌症分期外,切除时的组织学对尿路小细胞神经内分泌癌的复发风险也有很大影响。术后第一年脑转移的发生率明显高于“传统”尿路上皮癌,特别是小细胞癌持续存在,因此需要在此期间密切监测神经系统。
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.