Population Attributable Fraction of Non-Vaccination and Under-Vaccination of COVID-19 Due to Vaccine Hesitancy, 2022.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwaf009
Kimberly H Nguyen, E Lisa Chung, Robert A Bednarczyk, Lavanya Vasudevan
{"title":"Population Attributable Fraction of Non-Vaccination and Under-Vaccination of COVID-19 Due to Vaccine Hesitancy, 2022.","authors":"Kimberly H Nguyen, E Lisa Chung, Robert A Bednarczyk, Lavanya Vasudevan","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-vaccination and under-vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine may be attributed to multifaceted barriers including hesitancy and access issues. Using data from the CDC's Research and Development Survey, a nationally representative survey fielded from November 3, 2022 - December 12, 2022 (n=6,821), we examined the adjusted population attribution fraction (PAF) of COVID-19 non-vaccination and under-vaccination attributed to vaccine hesitancy by sociodemographic characteristics. Overall, the adjusted PAF of non-vaccination attributed to vaccine hesitancy was 84.8%, and the adjusted PAF of under-vaccination attributed to vaccine hesitancy decreased with increasing COVID-19 vaccine doses (76.0%, 41.0%, and 16.9% for ≥2, ≥3, and ≥4 doses, respectively). The proportion of adults who considered the social benefit of the vaccine, risk of contracting COVID-19, and information received from a medical provider increased with greater number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received. In contrast, the proportion of adults who were concerned about long-term impacts, speed of vaccine development and personal risk of getting vaccinated decreased with greater number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received. Understanding the PAF estimates from the acute phase of the pandemic serves as an important comparison for post-pandemic vaccination estimates, and is needed for messaging as COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths resurge in the fall of 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-vaccination and under-vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine may be attributed to multifaceted barriers including hesitancy and access issues. Using data from the CDC's Research and Development Survey, a nationally representative survey fielded from November 3, 2022 - December 12, 2022 (n=6,821), we examined the adjusted population attribution fraction (PAF) of COVID-19 non-vaccination and under-vaccination attributed to vaccine hesitancy by sociodemographic characteristics. Overall, the adjusted PAF of non-vaccination attributed to vaccine hesitancy was 84.8%, and the adjusted PAF of under-vaccination attributed to vaccine hesitancy decreased with increasing COVID-19 vaccine doses (76.0%, 41.0%, and 16.9% for ≥2, ≥3, and ≥4 doses, respectively). The proportion of adults who considered the social benefit of the vaccine, risk of contracting COVID-19, and information received from a medical provider increased with greater number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received. In contrast, the proportion of adults who were concerned about long-term impacts, speed of vaccine development and personal risk of getting vaccinated decreased with greater number of COVID-19 vaccine doses received. Understanding the PAF estimates from the acute phase of the pandemic serves as an important comparison for post-pandemic vaccination estimates, and is needed for messaging as COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths resurge in the fall of 2024.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因疫苗犹豫而未接种和接种不足的COVID-19人口归因比例,2022。
未接种和接种COVID-19疫苗不足可归因于多方面的障碍,包括犹豫和获取问题。利用美国疾病控制与预防中心研究与发展调查(一项于2022年11月3日至2022年12月12日进行的具有全国代表性的调查)的数据(n= 6821),我们通过社会人口统计学特征检查了COVID-19未接种疫苗和疫苗接种不足的调整后人口归因比例(PAF)。总体而言,由于疫苗犹豫而未接种疫苗的调整PAF为84.8%,由于疫苗犹豫而未接种疫苗的调整PAF随着COVID-19疫苗剂量的增加而降低(≥2、≥3和≥4剂量时分别为76.0%、41.0%和16.9%)。随着接种COVID-19疫苗剂量的增加,考虑疫苗的社会效益、感染COVID-19的风险以及从医疗提供者那里获得的信息的成年人比例增加。相比之下,担心长期影响、疫苗开发速度和接种疫苗个人风险的成年人比例随着接种COVID-19疫苗剂量的增加而下降。从大流行的急性阶段了解PAF估计数可以作为大流行后疫苗接种估计数的重要比较,并且需要在2024年秋季COVID-19病例,住院和死亡人数回升的情况下进行信息传递。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
High-dimensional multiple imputation (HDMI) for partially observed confounders including natural language processing-derived auxiliary covariates. Population Attributable Fraction of Non-Vaccination and Under-Vaccination of COVID-19 Due to Vaccine Hesitancy, 2022. Revealing trends in measles immunity during periods of varying measles circulation in Madagascar. Correction to: "Canonical causal diagrams to guide the treatment of missing data in epidemiologic studies". Fostering public health and academic partnerships during and beyond a public health emergency: lessons learned from COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1