Comparison of whole genome sequencing performance from fish swabs and fin clips.

IF 1.6 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES BMC Research Notes Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1186/s13104-024-07075-1
Annabell Macphee, Temitope Opeyemi Oriowo, Nils Sternberg, Madlen Stange
{"title":"Comparison of whole genome sequencing performance from fish swabs and fin clips.","authors":"Annabell Macphee, Temitope Opeyemi Oriowo, Nils Sternberg, Madlen Stange","doi":"10.1186/s13104-024-07075-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fin clipping is the standard DNA sampling technique for whole genome sequencing (WGS) of small fish. The collection of fin clips requires anaesthesia or even euthanisation of the individual. Swabbing may be a less invasive, non-lethal alternative to fin-clipping. Whether skin and gill swabs are comparable to fin clips in terms of DNA extraction quality and sequence read mapping performance from WGS was tested here on Eurasian minnows (Phoxinus phoxinus).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 49 fin clips, all met the DNA concentration threshold of 20 ng/μl, whereas 43 of 88 swabs met this requirement. Preserving swabs in ATL buffer and treatment with Proteinase K during DNA extraction consistently raised skin swab DNA concentrations above the cut-off. All samples passed the A260/A280 absorbance ratio cut-off of 1.3. Ultimately, 93.88% of the fin clips, 30.61% of the skin, and 7.69% of the gill swabs were suitable for sequencing. Mapping performances of all three tissues were comparable in reads passing quality filtering, percentage of reads mapping to the P. phoxinus reference genome, and coverage. Overall, skin swabs treated with Proteinase K during extraction, can match fin clips in WGS performance and represent a viable non-invasive DNA sampling alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":9234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Research Notes","volume":"18 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-07075-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Fin clipping is the standard DNA sampling technique for whole genome sequencing (WGS) of small fish. The collection of fin clips requires anaesthesia or even euthanisation of the individual. Swabbing may be a less invasive, non-lethal alternative to fin-clipping. Whether skin and gill swabs are comparable to fin clips in terms of DNA extraction quality and sequence read mapping performance from WGS was tested here on Eurasian minnows (Phoxinus phoxinus).

Results: Of 49 fin clips, all met the DNA concentration threshold of 20 ng/μl, whereas 43 of 88 swabs met this requirement. Preserving swabs in ATL buffer and treatment with Proteinase K during DNA extraction consistently raised skin swab DNA concentrations above the cut-off. All samples passed the A260/A280 absorbance ratio cut-off of 1.3. Ultimately, 93.88% of the fin clips, 30.61% of the skin, and 7.69% of the gill swabs were suitable for sequencing. Mapping performances of all three tissues were comparable in reads passing quality filtering, percentage of reads mapping to the P. phoxinus reference genome, and coverage. Overall, skin swabs treated with Proteinase K during extraction, can match fin clips in WGS performance and represent a viable non-invasive DNA sampling alternative.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鱼拭子和鱼鳍夹全基因组测序性能的比较。
目的:鱼鳍夹片是小型鱼类全基因组测序的标准DNA取样技术。收集鱼鳍夹需要麻醉,甚至对个体实施安乐死。擦拭可能是一种侵入性较小,非致命的替代鳍夹。本文对欧亚鲦鱼(Phoxinus Phoxinus)的皮肤和鳃拭子在DNA提取质量和序列读取定位性能方面是否与鳍夹相当进行了测试。结果:49份鱼片均满足20 ng/μl的DNA浓度阈值,88份拭子中有43份符合该阈值。在DNA提取过程中,将拭子保存在ATL缓冲液中并用蛋白酶K处理,始终使皮肤拭子的DNA浓度高于临界值。所有样品均通过A260/A280吸光度比截止值1.3。最终,93.88%的鳍夹、30.61%的皮肤和7.69%的鳃拭子适合测序。所有三种组织的定位性能在通过质量过滤的reads、定位到phoxinus参考基因组的reads百分比和覆盖率方面具有可比性。总的来说,在提取过程中,用蛋白酶K处理过的皮肤拭子在WGS性能上可以与鳍夹相匹配,是一种可行的非侵入性DNA取样替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Research Notes
BMC Research Notes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
363
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Research Notes publishes scientifically valid research outputs that cannot be considered as full research or methodology articles. We support the research community across all scientific and clinical disciplines by providing an open access forum for sharing data and useful information; this includes, but is not limited to, updates to previous work, additions to established methods, short publications, null results, research proposals and data management plans.
期刊最新文献
External validation of a multivariable prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery. Cooking with confidence for autistic youth: outcomes from a pilot program evaluation model. Fecal microbiota changes associated with pathogenic and non-pathogenic diarrheas in foals. Remodeling the light-adapted electroretinogram using a bayesian statistical approach. Interrupted time series datasets from studies investigating the impact of interventions or exposures in public health and social science: a data note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1