Influence of dietary protein and fiber intake interactions on the human gut microbiota composition and function: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 7.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Critical reviews in food science and nutrition Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1080/10408398.2025.2452362
Ian En Kai Mak, Yueying Yao, Magdeline Tao Tao Ng, Jung Eun Kim
{"title":"Influence of dietary protein and fiber intake interactions on the human gut microbiota composition and function: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Ian En Kai Mak, Yueying Yao, Magdeline Tao Tao Ng, Jung Eun Kim","doi":"10.1080/10408398.2025.2452362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantity and source of dietary protein intakes impact the gut microbiota differently. However, these effects have not been systematically studied. This review aimed to investigate these effects whilst controlling for fiber intake. Seven databases were searched, with 50 and 15 randomized controlled trials selected for the systematic review and network meta-analysis respectively. Most gut microbiota-related outcomes showed no significant differences between different protein and fiber intake combinations. Compared to Normal Protein, High Fiber intakes, High Protein, Low Fiber (HPLF) intakes showed greater fecal valerate (SMD = 0.79, 95% CrI: 0.35, 1.24) and plasma trimethylamine <i>N</i>-oxide (TMAO) (SMD = 2.90, 95% CrI: 0.16, 5.65) levels. HPLF intakes also showed greater fecal propionate (SMD = 0.49, 95% CrI: 0.02, 1.07) and valerate (SMD = 0.79, 95% CrI: 0.31, 1.28) levels compared to High Protein, High Fiber intakes. Greater plasma TMAO levels were observed with greater animal protein intakes. Overall, protein quantity and source do not generally alter the gut microbiota composition, although protein quantity can influence microbiota function via modulations in proteolytic fermentation. Both protein and fiber intake should be considered when assessing the impact of dietary protein on the gut microbiota. This trial was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023391270).</p>","PeriodicalId":10767,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in food science and nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in food science and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2025.2452362","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantity and source of dietary protein intakes impact the gut microbiota differently. However, these effects have not been systematically studied. This review aimed to investigate these effects whilst controlling for fiber intake. Seven databases were searched, with 50 and 15 randomized controlled trials selected for the systematic review and network meta-analysis respectively. Most gut microbiota-related outcomes showed no significant differences between different protein and fiber intake combinations. Compared to Normal Protein, High Fiber intakes, High Protein, Low Fiber (HPLF) intakes showed greater fecal valerate (SMD = 0.79, 95% CrI: 0.35, 1.24) and plasma trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) (SMD = 2.90, 95% CrI: 0.16, 5.65) levels. HPLF intakes also showed greater fecal propionate (SMD = 0.49, 95% CrI: 0.02, 1.07) and valerate (SMD = 0.79, 95% CrI: 0.31, 1.28) levels compared to High Protein, High Fiber intakes. Greater plasma TMAO levels were observed with greater animal protein intakes. Overall, protein quantity and source do not generally alter the gut microbiota composition, although protein quantity can influence microbiota function via modulations in proteolytic fermentation. Both protein and fiber intake should be considered when assessing the impact of dietary protein on the gut microbiota. This trial was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023391270).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膳食蛋白质和纤维摄入相互作用对人体肠道微生物群组成和功能的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析
膳食蛋白质摄入量和来源对肠道微生物群的影响不同。然而,这些影响还没有被系统地研究过。本综述旨在研究这些影响,同时控制纤维摄入量。检索了7个数据库,分别选择了50个和15个随机对照试验进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析。大多数与肠道微生物群相关的结果显示,不同蛋白质和纤维摄入组合之间没有显著差异。与正常蛋白质相比,高纤维摄入、高蛋白低纤维(HPLF)摄入的粪便戊酸盐(SMD = 0.79, 95% CrI: 0.35, 1.24)和血浆三甲胺n -氧化物(TMAO) (SMD = 2.90, 95% CrI: 0.16, 5.65)水平更高。与高蛋白高纤维摄食组相比,高蛋白质高纤维摄食组的粪便丙酸盐(SMD = 0.49, 95% CrI: 0.02, 1.07)和戊酸盐(SMD = 0.79, 95% CrI: 0.31, 1.28)水平也更高。动物蛋白摄入量越大,血浆TMAO水平越高。总的来说,蛋白质的数量和来源通常不会改变肠道微生物群的组成,尽管蛋白质的数量可以通过调节蛋白质水解发酵来影响微生物群的功能。在评估膳食蛋白质对肠道微生物群的影响时,应同时考虑蛋白质和纤维的摄入量。该试验在普洛斯彼罗注册(CRD42023391270)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
600
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition serves as an authoritative outlet for critical perspectives on contemporary technology, food science, and human nutrition. With a specific focus on issues of national significance, particularly for food scientists, nutritionists, and health professionals, the journal delves into nutrition, functional foods, food safety, and food science and technology. Research areas span diverse topics such as diet and disease, antioxidants, allergenicity, microbiological concerns, flavor chemistry, nutrient roles and bioavailability, pesticides, toxic chemicals and regulation, risk assessment, food safety, and emerging food products, ingredients, and technologies.
期刊最新文献
Food-derived alcohol dehydrogenase activating peptides: production, identification, structure-activity relationship, and mechanism of action. Resilient foods for preventing global famine: a review of food supply interventions for global catastrophic food shocks including nuclear winter and infrastructure collapse. Barley fermentation on nutritional constituents: structural changes and structure-function correlations. Nano-targeted delivery system: a promising strategy of anthocyanin encapsulation for treating intestinal inflammation. Personalized nutrition: perspectives on challenges, opportunities, and guiding principles for data use and fusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1