Detecting respiratory impairment in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis by MRC dyspnoea scale and microfibrillar-associated protein 4.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2024.2449270
Bjørk K Sofiudottir, Sören Möller, Robin Christensen, Stefan Harders, Grith L Sørensen, Jesper Blegvad, Mette Herly, Dzenan Masic, Grazina Urbonaviciene, Frank Andersen, Christin Isaksen, Brian Bridal Løgstrup, Charlotte Hyldgaard, Torkell Ellingsen
{"title":"Detecting respiratory impairment in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis by MRC dyspnoea scale and microfibrillar-associated protein 4.","authors":"Bjørk K Sofiudottir, Sören Möller, Robin Christensen, Stefan Harders, Grith L Sørensen, Jesper Blegvad, Mette Herly, Dzenan Masic, Grazina Urbonaviciene, Frank Andersen, Christin Isaksen, Brian Bridal Løgstrup, Charlotte Hyldgaard, Torkell Ellingsen","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2024.2449270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale and serum Microfibrillar-associated protein 4 (MFAP4) levels for the detection of respiratory impairment in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent blood tests, pulmonary function tests (PFT) and dyspnoea assessment using the MRC scale. Respiratory impairment was defined as a diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <80% predicted or FEV1/FVC <70%. The primary outcomes were the MRC and MFAP4's sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and thirty-one patients had available baseline tests. Mean age was 57.7 years (SD: 10.9), 61% were female, and 45% had respiratory impairment. For MRC score ≥ 2, the sensitivity was 39.0% (95% CI 26.5; 52.6), specificity 76.4% (95% CI 64.9; 85.6), and DOR 2.07 (95% CI 0.97; 4.40). For MFAP4 > 29.0 U/mL, the sensitivity was 62.7% (95% CI 49.1; 75.0), specificity 56.9% (95% CI 44.7; 68.6), and DOR 2.22 (95% CI 1.10; 4.50). The DOR was 3.01 (95% CI 1.27; 7.16) for MFAP4 detecting respiratory impairment when adjusted for age, sex and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MRC dyspnoea score and unadjusted MFAP4 levels were poor predictors of respiratory impairment in patients with early treatment-naïve rheumatoid arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"2449270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2024.2449270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale and serum Microfibrillar-associated protein 4 (MFAP4) levels for the detection of respiratory impairment in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Patients underwent blood tests, pulmonary function tests (PFT) and dyspnoea assessment using the MRC scale. Respiratory impairment was defined as a diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <80% predicted or FEV1/FVC <70%. The primary outcomes were the MRC and MFAP4's sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: One hundred and thirty-one patients had available baseline tests. Mean age was 57.7 years (SD: 10.9), 61% were female, and 45% had respiratory impairment. For MRC score ≥ 2, the sensitivity was 39.0% (95% CI 26.5; 52.6), specificity 76.4% (95% CI 64.9; 85.6), and DOR 2.07 (95% CI 0.97; 4.40). For MFAP4 > 29.0 U/mL, the sensitivity was 62.7% (95% CI 49.1; 75.0), specificity 56.9% (95% CI 44.7; 68.6), and DOR 2.22 (95% CI 1.10; 4.50). The DOR was 3.01 (95% CI 1.27; 7.16) for MFAP4 detecting respiratory impairment when adjusted for age, sex and smoking status.

Conclusion: The MRC dyspnoea score and unadjusted MFAP4 levels were poor predictors of respiratory impairment in patients with early treatment-naïve rheumatoid arthritis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MRC呼吸困难量表和微纤维相关蛋白4检测新诊断的类风湿关节炎呼吸损伤
目的:评价医学研究委员会(MRC)呼吸困难量表和血清微纤维相关蛋白4 (MFAP4)水平在新诊断的类风湿关节炎(RA)中检测呼吸障碍的价值。方法:对患者进行血液检查、肺功能检查(PFT)和MRC评分评估呼吸困难。呼吸障碍被定义为肺对一氧化碳(DLCO)的扩散能力。结果:131例患者有可用的基线测试。平均年龄57.7岁(SD: 10.9), 61%为女性,45%为呼吸障碍。对于MRC评分≥2,敏感性为39.0% (95% CI 26.5;52.6),特异性76.4% (95% CI 64.9;85.6), DOR为2.07 (95% CI 0.97;4.40)。对于MFAP4 bb0 29.0 U/mL,敏感性为62.7% (95% CI 49.1;75.0),特异性56.9% (95% CI 44.7;68.6), DOR为2.22 (95% CI 1.10;4.50)。DOR为3.01 (95% CI 1.27;7.16) MFAP4在调整年龄、性别和吸烟状况后检测呼吸障碍。结论:MRC呼吸困难评分和未调整的MFAP4水平是早期treatment-naïve类风湿性关节炎患者呼吸功能障碍的不良预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Complications during chest tube drainage for iatrogenic pneumothorax. Detecting respiratory impairment in newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis by MRC dyspnoea scale and microfibrillar-associated protein 4. Trends in pulmonary function in patients with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Cardiac troponin and increased mortality risk among individuals with restrictive spirometric pattern on lung function testing. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the self evaluation of breathing questionnaire (SEBQ) into Danish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1