A novel tool for assessing pediatric emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: a pilot study.

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1186/s12245-024-00802-2
Sonia Y Jarrett, Andrew Redfern, Joyce Li, Camilo E Gutierrez, Priyanka Patel, Olurotimi Akinola, Michelle L Niescierenko
{"title":"A novel tool for assessing pediatric emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: a pilot study.","authors":"Sonia Y Jarrett, Andrew Redfern, Joyce Li, Camilo E Gutierrez, Priyanka Patel, Olurotimi Akinola, Michelle L Niescierenko","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00802-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, most children seek emergency care at general rather than specialized pediatric emergency departments. There remains significant variation in the provision of pediatric emergency care, particularly in resource-constrained settings. The objective of this study is to pilot a self-assessment tool to evaluate pediatric emergency care capabilities in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) hospitals on the African Continent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cross-sectional descriptive study using a convenience sample of sub-Saharan African hospitals. The assessment tool was developed by operationalizing the technical contents of existing standards and guidelines from international bodies including the World Health Organization and International Federation of Emergency Medicine. The pilot was conducted at emergency departments located across different regions on the African continent. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate different domains of pediatric emergency care capabilities including pediatric triage, protocols, staffing, training, equipment, consumables, and medicines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen hospitals with emergency departments completed the assessment tool (participation rate of 76%). The hospitals were in nine different countries across four regions of sub-Saharan Africa. National/academic hospitals comprised 56.3% of the participating hospitals. The majority, 44%, of these hospitals saw pediatric patient volumes of 2,000-4,999 patients per year. Dedicated pediatric triage spaces and resuscitation spaces were available at 37.5% and 56.3%, respectively. Formal pediatric resuscitation guidelines were used at 62.5%. Doctors on the self-assessment teams came from primarily pediatrics and general practitioner training backgrounds (both 68.8%). Basic respiratory and airway support equipment (e.g. oxygen, bag-valve mask devices) were available in all participating hospitals, whereas advanced airway equipment (e.g. pediatric intubation equipment) was available in 37.5% of hospitals. Most medicines from the World Health Organization Essential Medicines list were available at participating hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To date, this is the first assessment tool dedicated to the comprehensive evaluation of pediatric emergency care in LMICs. This pilot provides a first approach to evaluate pediatric emergency healthcare capabilities in the hospital setting with future directions to improve the tool based on qualitative feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00802-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, most children seek emergency care at general rather than specialized pediatric emergency departments. There remains significant variation in the provision of pediatric emergency care, particularly in resource-constrained settings. The objective of this study is to pilot a self-assessment tool to evaluate pediatric emergency care capabilities in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) hospitals on the African Continent.

Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional descriptive study using a convenience sample of sub-Saharan African hospitals. The assessment tool was developed by operationalizing the technical contents of existing standards and guidelines from international bodies including the World Health Organization and International Federation of Emergency Medicine. The pilot was conducted at emergency departments located across different regions on the African continent. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate different domains of pediatric emergency care capabilities including pediatric triage, protocols, staffing, training, equipment, consumables, and medicines.

Results: Sixteen hospitals with emergency departments completed the assessment tool (participation rate of 76%). The hospitals were in nine different countries across four regions of sub-Saharan Africa. National/academic hospitals comprised 56.3% of the participating hospitals. The majority, 44%, of these hospitals saw pediatric patient volumes of 2,000-4,999 patients per year. Dedicated pediatric triage spaces and resuscitation spaces were available at 37.5% and 56.3%, respectively. Formal pediatric resuscitation guidelines were used at 62.5%. Doctors on the self-assessment teams came from primarily pediatrics and general practitioner training backgrounds (both 68.8%). Basic respiratory and airway support equipment (e.g. oxygen, bag-valve mask devices) were available in all participating hospitals, whereas advanced airway equipment (e.g. pediatric intubation equipment) was available in 37.5% of hospitals. Most medicines from the World Health Organization Essential Medicines list were available at participating hospitals.

Conclusions: To date, this is the first assessment tool dedicated to the comprehensive evaluation of pediatric emergency care in LMICs. This pilot provides a first approach to evaluate pediatric emergency healthcare capabilities in the hospital setting with future directions to improve the tool based on qualitative feedback.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估低收入和中等收入国家儿科急诊护理的新工具:一项试点研究。
背景:在全球范围内,大多数儿童在普通儿科而不是专门的儿科急诊科寻求急诊治疗。在提供儿科急诊护理方面仍然存在很大差异,特别是在资源有限的情况下。本研究的目的是试点一种自我评估工具,以评估非洲大陆中低收入国家(LMIC)医院的儿科急诊护理能力。方法:这是一项前瞻性横断面描述性研究,使用撒哈拉以南非洲医院的方便样本。该评估工具是根据世界卫生组织和国际急诊医学联合会等国际机构的现有标准和准则的技术内容制定的。该试点在非洲大陆不同区域的急诊科进行。描述性统计用于评估儿科急诊护理能力的不同领域,包括儿科分诊、方案、人员配置、培训、设备、消耗品和药物。结果:16家急诊科医院完成了评估工具,参与率为76%。这些医院分布在撒哈拉以南非洲四个地区的九个不同国家。国立/学术医院占参与医院的56.3%。这些医院中的大多数(44%)每年的儿科患者数量为2 000-4 999人。专门的儿科分诊空间和复苏空间分别为37.5%和56.3%。正式儿科复苏指南的使用率为62.5%。自我评估小组的医生主要来自儿科和全科医生培训背景(均为68.8%)。所有参与医院都有基本的呼吸和气道支持设备(如氧气、气囊阀面罩装置),而37.5%的医院有先进的气道设备(如儿科插管设备)。参与医院可获得世界卫生组织基本药物清单中的大多数药物。结论:迄今为止,这是第一个专门用于综合评估中低收入国家儿科急诊护理的评估工具。该试点提供了评估医院儿科急诊医疗能力的第一种方法,并提供了基于定性反馈改进该工具的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Emergency department crowding in the Netherlands; evaluation of a real-time ambulance diversion dashboard. A case of stroke as a unique sign of subclinical infective endocarditis by Abiotrophia defectiva: a case report. Retrospective analysis of trauma patients transported by dispatch monitored type B ambulances to Dhulikhel Hospital, Kavre, Nepal, 2019-2023. A novel tool for assessing pediatric emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: a pilot study. Lack of standardization in the nomenclature of dating strokes or the desperate search for a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1