Marielle Nagele, Zerrin Yetkin, Kenneth Chase Bailey, David Denney, Thomas O'neil, Sasha Alick, Roderick McColl, Jason A D Smith
{"title":"Non-language neuropsychological measures increase sensitivity of identifying language reorganization in patients with epilepsy: a pilot study.","authors":"Marielle Nagele, Zerrin Yetkin, Kenneth Chase Bailey, David Denney, Thomas O'neil, Sasha Alick, Roderick McColl, Jason A D Smith","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2451320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine neuropsychological characteristic differences between typical and atypical language dominance in adult persons with epilepsy (PWE) and mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), including exploring the impact of selected clinical variables on detection of atypical language and neuropsychological performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with intractable epilepsy and MTS (<i>n</i> = 39) underwent comprehensive, pre-surgical evaluation including fMRI and neuropsychological assessment. Participants with concordant lateralization of MTS and seizure onset were included. Participants were grouped by dichotomized typical or atypical language lateralization based on fMRI results. Neuropsychological performance and other relevant clinical variables of the aforementioned groups were then compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those with atypical language demonstrated poorer performance across neuropsychological tasks as compared to those with typical language lateralization. Although, typical neuropsychological measures used to evaluate language lateralization were not among those significantly different between the groups. Differences in neuropsychological performance were particularly pronounced on TMT A, TMT B, Stroop (Color), GPB (Dominant), and GPB (Non-Dominant). ROC Curve was provided to evaluate reproducibility at different thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study revealed those with atypical language lateralization demonstrated greater cognitive dysfunction across neuropsychological tasks than those with typical language lateralization. Neuropsychological measures outside of the domain of language tests detected subtle changes of functional neuroanatomical reorganization while language domain tasks revealed no significant differences between aforementioned groups in pre-surgical evaluation of PWE. While these preliminary results require further replication, these are important implications for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2451320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine neuropsychological characteristic differences between typical and atypical language dominance in adult persons with epilepsy (PWE) and mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS), including exploring the impact of selected clinical variables on detection of atypical language and neuropsychological performance.
Methods: Adults with intractable epilepsy and MTS (n = 39) underwent comprehensive, pre-surgical evaluation including fMRI and neuropsychological assessment. Participants with concordant lateralization of MTS and seizure onset were included. Participants were grouped by dichotomized typical or atypical language lateralization based on fMRI results. Neuropsychological performance and other relevant clinical variables of the aforementioned groups were then compared.
Results: Those with atypical language demonstrated poorer performance across neuropsychological tasks as compared to those with typical language lateralization. Although, typical neuropsychological measures used to evaluate language lateralization were not among those significantly different between the groups. Differences in neuropsychological performance were particularly pronounced on TMT A, TMT B, Stroop (Color), GPB (Dominant), and GPB (Non-Dominant). ROC Curve was provided to evaluate reproducibility at different thresholds.
Conclusion: This pilot study revealed those with atypical language lateralization demonstrated greater cognitive dysfunction across neuropsychological tasks than those with typical language lateralization. Neuropsychological measures outside of the domain of language tests detected subtle changes of functional neuroanatomical reorganization while language domain tasks revealed no significant differences between aforementioned groups in pre-surgical evaluation of PWE. While these preliminary results require further replication, these are important implications for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.