Karen Sun, Rayna Marshall, Michael Frankland, Amal Taylor, Cynthia Montana, Eric Crowell, Karen R Armbrust, Laura Kopplin, Meghan Berkenstock
{"title":"Barriers to Adherence with Clinic Visits in Patients with Uveitis.","authors":"Karen Sun, Rayna Marshall, Michael Frankland, Amal Taylor, Cynthia Montana, Eric Crowell, Karen R Armbrust, Laura Kopplin, Meghan Berkenstock","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2456641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the patient barriers to adherence with appointment follow-up in patients with ocular inflammatory disorders across the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter study of adult and pediatric patients at the Wilmer Eye Institute, University of Texas at Austin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Veterans Administration Hospital, and Washington University of St. Louis. The primary outcome was self-reported adherence to follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes were the reasons for missing follow-up including sub analyses of patient demographics. Eligible patients completed a self-reporting survey to assess barriers to attending follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was fully completed by 210 subjects and partially by 40 (250 in total), of whom were 67% white, 59% female, and 51% had a college or advanced degree. Most patients had bilateral (68%), anterior (51%) uveitis. Patients were treated with topical corticosteroids (33%), immunosuppressive agents (23%), or both (22%). Most patients (79%) did not miss or cancel appointments. Ninety-seven percent of patients had medical insurance and some paid (39%) more than 40 dollars for their copay. Copay costs limited the number of visits patients could attend in 7% of patients. Eight percent of patients missed appointments due to inability to take off time from work and 5% missed visits due to lack of transportation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients with ocular inflammation reported good adherence to follow-up appointments. Insurance type, copay costs, transportation, patient scheduling, and patient understanding were all minimally reported to effect patient visit attendance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2456641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the patient barriers to adherence with appointment follow-up in patients with ocular inflammatory disorders across the United States.
Methods: This was a multicenter study of adult and pediatric patients at the Wilmer Eye Institute, University of Texas at Austin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Veterans Administration Hospital, and Washington University of St. Louis. The primary outcome was self-reported adherence to follow-up visits. Secondary outcomes were the reasons for missing follow-up including sub analyses of patient demographics. Eligible patients completed a self-reporting survey to assess barriers to attending follow-up visits.
Results: The survey was fully completed by 210 subjects and partially by 40 (250 in total), of whom were 67% white, 59% female, and 51% had a college or advanced degree. Most patients had bilateral (68%), anterior (51%) uveitis. Patients were treated with topical corticosteroids (33%), immunosuppressive agents (23%), or both (22%). Most patients (79%) did not miss or cancel appointments. Ninety-seven percent of patients had medical insurance and some paid (39%) more than 40 dollars for their copay. Copay costs limited the number of visits patients could attend in 7% of patients. Eight percent of patients missed appointments due to inability to take off time from work and 5% missed visits due to lack of transportation.
Conclusion: Most patients with ocular inflammation reported good adherence to follow-up appointments. Insurance type, copay costs, transportation, patient scheduling, and patient understanding were all minimally reported to effect patient visit attendance.
期刊介绍:
Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.