Jort A Groen, Timoteo D Herrera, Johannes Crezee, H Petra Kok
{"title":"Robust stochastic optimisation strategies for locoregional hyperthermia treatment planning using polynomial chaos expansion.","authors":"Jort A Groen, Timoteo D Herrera, Johannes Crezee, H Petra Kok","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ada685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Conventional temperature optimization in hyperthermia treatment planning aims to maximize tumour temperature (e.g.<i>T</i>90; the temperature reached in at least 90% of the tumour) while enforcing hard constraints on normal tissue temperature (max(T<sub>tissue</sub>) ⩽45 °C). This method generally incorrectly assumes that tissue/perfusion properties are known, typically relying on average values from the literature. To enhance the reliability of temperature optimization in clinical applications, we developed new robust optimization strategies to reduce the impact of tissue/perfusion property uncertainties.<i>Approach.</i>Within the software package Plan2Heat, temperature calculations during optimization apply efficient superposition of precomputed distributions, represented by a temperature matrix (<i>T</i>-matrix). We extended this method using stochastic polynomial chaos expansion models to compute an average<i>T</i>-matrix (<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>) and a covariance matrix<i>C</i>to account for uncertainties in tissue/perfusion properties. Three new strategies were implemented using<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>and<i>C</i>during optimization: (1)<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>90 maximization, hard constraint on max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>), (2)<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>90 maximization, hard constraint on max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>) variation, and (3) combined<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>90 maximization and variation minimization, hard constraint on max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>). Conventional and new optimization strategies were tested in a cervical cancer patient. 100 test cases were generated, randomly sampling tissue-property probability distributions. Tumour<i>T</i>90 and hot spots (max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>) >45 °C) were evaluated for each sample.<i>Main Results.</i>Conventional optimization had 28 samples without hot spots, with a median<i>T</i>90 of 39.7 °C. For strategies (1), (2) and (3), the number of samples without hot spots was increased to 33, 41 and 36, respectively. Median<i>T</i>90 was reduced lightly, by ∼0.1 °C-0.3 °C, for strategies (1-3). Tissue volumes exceeding 45 °C and variation in max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>) were less for the novel strategies.<i>Significance.</i>Optimization strategies that account for tissue-property uncertainties demonstrated fewer, and reduced in volume, normal tissue hot spots, with only a marginal reduction in tumour<i>T</i>90. This implies a potential clinical utility in reducing the need for, or the impact of, device setting adjustments during hyperthermia treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":"70 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ada685","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective.Conventional temperature optimization in hyperthermia treatment planning aims to maximize tumour temperature (e.g.T90; the temperature reached in at least 90% of the tumour) while enforcing hard constraints on normal tissue temperature (max(Ttissue) ⩽45 °C). This method generally incorrectly assumes that tissue/perfusion properties are known, typically relying on average values from the literature. To enhance the reliability of temperature optimization in clinical applications, we developed new robust optimization strategies to reduce the impact of tissue/perfusion property uncertainties.Approach.Within the software package Plan2Heat, temperature calculations during optimization apply efficient superposition of precomputed distributions, represented by a temperature matrix (T-matrix). We extended this method using stochastic polynomial chaos expansion models to compute an averageT-matrix (Tavg) and a covariance matrixCto account for uncertainties in tissue/perfusion properties. Three new strategies were implemented usingTavgandCduring optimization: (1)Tavg90 maximization, hard constraint on max(Ttissue), (2)Tavg90 maximization, hard constraint on max(Ttissue) variation, and (3) combinedTavg90 maximization and variation minimization, hard constraint on max(Ttissue). Conventional and new optimization strategies were tested in a cervical cancer patient. 100 test cases were generated, randomly sampling tissue-property probability distributions. TumourT90 and hot spots (max(Ttissue) >45 °C) were evaluated for each sample.Main Results.Conventional optimization had 28 samples without hot spots, with a medianT90 of 39.7 °C. For strategies (1), (2) and (3), the number of samples without hot spots was increased to 33, 41 and 36, respectively. MedianT90 was reduced lightly, by ∼0.1 °C-0.3 °C, for strategies (1-3). Tissue volumes exceeding 45 °C and variation in max(Ttissue) were less for the novel strategies.Significance.Optimization strategies that account for tissue-property uncertainties demonstrated fewer, and reduced in volume, normal tissue hot spots, with only a marginal reduction in tumourT90. This implies a potential clinical utility in reducing the need for, or the impact of, device setting adjustments during hyperthermia treatment.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry