Robust stochastic optimisation strategies for locoregional hyperthermia treatment planning using polynomial chaos expansion.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Physics in medicine and biology Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ada685
Jort A Groen, Timoteo D Herrera, Johannes Crezee, H Petra Kok
{"title":"Robust stochastic optimisation strategies for locoregional hyperthermia treatment planning using polynomial chaos expansion.","authors":"Jort A Groen, Timoteo D Herrera, Johannes Crezee, H Petra Kok","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ada685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Conventional temperature optimization in hyperthermia treatment planning aims to maximize tumour temperature (e.g.<i>T</i>90; the temperature reached in at least 90% of the tumour) while enforcing hard constraints on normal tissue temperature (max(T<sub>tissue</sub>) ⩽45 °C). This method generally incorrectly assumes that tissue/perfusion properties are known, typically relying on average values from the literature. To enhance the reliability of temperature optimization in clinical applications, we developed new robust optimization strategies to reduce the impact of tissue/perfusion property uncertainties.<i>Approach.</i>Within the software package Plan2Heat, temperature calculations during optimization apply efficient superposition of precomputed distributions, represented by a temperature matrix (<i>T</i>-matrix). We extended this method using stochastic polynomial chaos expansion models to compute an average<i>T</i>-matrix (<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>) and a covariance matrix<i>C</i>to account for uncertainties in tissue/perfusion properties. Three new strategies were implemented using<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>and<i>C</i>during optimization: (1)<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>90 maximization, hard constraint on max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>), (2)<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>90 maximization, hard constraint on max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>) variation, and (3) combined<i>T</i><sub>avg</sub>90 maximization and variation minimization, hard constraint on max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>). Conventional and new optimization strategies were tested in a cervical cancer patient. 100 test cases were generated, randomly sampling tissue-property probability distributions. Tumour<i>T</i>90 and hot spots (max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>) >45 °C) were evaluated for each sample.<i>Main Results.</i>Conventional optimization had 28 samples without hot spots, with a median<i>T</i>90 of 39.7 °C. For strategies (1), (2) and (3), the number of samples without hot spots was increased to 33, 41 and 36, respectively. Median<i>T</i>90 was reduced lightly, by ∼0.1 °C-0.3 °C, for strategies (1-3). Tissue volumes exceeding 45 °C and variation in max(<i>T</i><sub>tissue</sub>) were less for the novel strategies.<i>Significance.</i>Optimization strategies that account for tissue-property uncertainties demonstrated fewer, and reduced in volume, normal tissue hot spots, with only a marginal reduction in tumour<i>T</i>90. This implies a potential clinical utility in reducing the need for, or the impact of, device setting adjustments during hyperthermia treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":"70 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ada685","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Conventional temperature optimization in hyperthermia treatment planning aims to maximize tumour temperature (e.g.T90; the temperature reached in at least 90% of the tumour) while enforcing hard constraints on normal tissue temperature (max(Ttissue) ⩽45 °C). This method generally incorrectly assumes that tissue/perfusion properties are known, typically relying on average values from the literature. To enhance the reliability of temperature optimization in clinical applications, we developed new robust optimization strategies to reduce the impact of tissue/perfusion property uncertainties.Approach.Within the software package Plan2Heat, temperature calculations during optimization apply efficient superposition of precomputed distributions, represented by a temperature matrix (T-matrix). We extended this method using stochastic polynomial chaos expansion models to compute an averageT-matrix (Tavg) and a covariance matrixCto account for uncertainties in tissue/perfusion properties. Three new strategies were implemented usingTavgandCduring optimization: (1)Tavg90 maximization, hard constraint on max(Ttissue), (2)Tavg90 maximization, hard constraint on max(Ttissue) variation, and (3) combinedTavg90 maximization and variation minimization, hard constraint on max(Ttissue). Conventional and new optimization strategies were tested in a cervical cancer patient. 100 test cases were generated, randomly sampling tissue-property probability distributions. TumourT90 and hot spots (max(Ttissue) >45 °C) were evaluated for each sample.Main Results.Conventional optimization had 28 samples without hot spots, with a medianT90 of 39.7 °C. For strategies (1), (2) and (3), the number of samples without hot spots was increased to 33, 41 and 36, respectively. MedianT90 was reduced lightly, by ∼0.1 °C-0.3 °C, for strategies (1-3). Tissue volumes exceeding 45 °C and variation in max(Ttissue) were less for the novel strategies.Significance.Optimization strategies that account for tissue-property uncertainties demonstrated fewer, and reduced in volume, normal tissue hot spots, with only a marginal reduction in tumourT90. This implies a potential clinical utility in reducing the need for, or the impact of, device setting adjustments during hyperthermia treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多项式混沌展开的局部区域热疗计划鲁棒随机优化策略。
目标。常规热疗计划中的温度优化旨在最大化肿瘤温度(例如t90;至少90%的肿瘤达到温度),同时对正常组织温度施加严格限制(最高(组织)≥45°C)。这种方法通常错误地假设组织/灌注特性是已知的,通常依赖于文献中的平均值。为了提高临床应用中温度优化的可靠性,我们开发了新的鲁棒优化策略,以减少组织/灌注特性不确定性的影响。方法:在Plan2Heat软件包中,优化过程中的温度计算有效地叠加了预先计算的分布,由温度矩阵(t矩阵)表示。我们使用随机多项式混沌展开模型对该方法进行了扩展,以计算平均矩阵(Tavg)和协方差矩阵来考虑组织/灌注特性的不确定性。在优化过程中,利用Tavg90和Tavg90实现了三种新的策略:(1)Tavg90最大化,对max(Ttissue)进行硬约束;(2)Tavg90最大化,对max(Ttissue)变化进行硬约束;(3)Tavg90最大化和变化最小化相结合,对max(Ttissue)进行硬约束。在宫颈癌患者中测试了传统和新的优化策略。生成100个测试用例,随机抽样组织属性概率分布。评估每个样本的肿瘤和热点(最大(组织)温度为45°C)。主要的结果。常规优化28个样品无热点,介质温度为39.7°C。对于策略(1)、(2)和(3),无热点的样本数量分别增加到33、41和36个。对于策略(1-3),MedianT90轻度降低约0.1°C-0.3°C。意义:考虑组织特性不确定性的优化策略显示正常组织热点较少,且体积减少,肿瘤仅略有减少。这意味着在减少高温治疗期间设备设置调整的需要或影响方面具有潜在的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
期刊最新文献
Initial results of the Hyperion IIDPET insert for simultaneous PET-MRI applied to atherosclerotic plaque imaging in New-Zealand white rabbits. A multiplexing method based on multidimensional readout method. Diffusion transformer model with compact prior for low-dose PET reconstruction. A dual-domain network with division residual connection and feature fusion for CBCT scatter correction. A ConvLSTM-based model for predicting thermal damage during laser interstitial thermal therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1