{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in treating very severe obstructive sleep apnea: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Shirley Leibovitz, Shai Levi, Aiham Hanut, Robert Yanko, Yair Sharav, Yaron Haviv","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03249-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The repeated airway obstructions in the common disorder Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) cause health risks. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), the standard treatment, faces adherence challenges. Mandibular Advancement Devices (MADs) have been used successfully for mild to moderate OSA, as a good alternative for these patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to evaluate the effectiveness of MADs in reducing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and improving symptoms in patients with very severe OSA unable to tolerate CPAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 22 patients with very severe OSA (AHI ≥ 50) treated with MADs. Baseline characteristics, including: age, sex, BMI, and AHI, were recorded, and changes in AHI following treatment were assessed. Adherence was monitored using patient-reported data. Unlike previous studies, this research focuses exclusively on the efficacy of MADs in treating patients with very severe OSA, a population often excluded from similar inspections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>median AHI significantly decreased from 60.0 (IQR: 57.0-65.0) to 15.0 (IQR: 10.0-24.0) after treatment (P < 0.001), with a mean reduction of 72.5% (± 14.3). Notably, 95.5% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in AHI. Symptom improvements, including reduced snoring and daytime tiredness, were reported by 72.7% of patients. BMI positively correlated with baseline AHI, and significant AHI reductions were observed across overweight and obese categories, although some patients remained in the severe AHI range post-treatment. Adherence varied, with 63.6% continuing to use the device.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MADs are effective in managing very severe OSA, providing significant reductions in AHI and symptom improvements. MADs may be a viable alternative for patients unable to tolerate CPAP. Further investigations into the long-term efficacy and impact on quality of life are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03249-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The repeated airway obstructions in the common disorder Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) cause health risks. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), the standard treatment, faces adherence challenges. Mandibular Advancement Devices (MADs) have been used successfully for mild to moderate OSA, as a good alternative for these patients.
Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of MADs in reducing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and improving symptoms in patients with very severe OSA unable to tolerate CPAP.
Methods: This retrospective study included 22 patients with very severe OSA (AHI ≥ 50) treated with MADs. Baseline characteristics, including: age, sex, BMI, and AHI, were recorded, and changes in AHI following treatment were assessed. Adherence was monitored using patient-reported data. Unlike previous studies, this research focuses exclusively on the efficacy of MADs in treating patients with very severe OSA, a population often excluded from similar inspections.
Results: median AHI significantly decreased from 60.0 (IQR: 57.0-65.0) to 15.0 (IQR: 10.0-24.0) after treatment (P < 0.001), with a mean reduction of 72.5% (± 14.3). Notably, 95.5% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in AHI. Symptom improvements, including reduced snoring and daytime tiredness, were reported by 72.7% of patients. BMI positively correlated with baseline AHI, and significant AHI reductions were observed across overweight and obese categories, although some patients remained in the severe AHI range post-treatment. Adherence varied, with 63.6% continuing to use the device.
Conclusions: MADs are effective in managing very severe OSA, providing significant reductions in AHI and symptom improvements. MADs may be a viable alternative for patients unable to tolerate CPAP. Further investigations into the long-term efficacy and impact on quality of life are needed.
期刊介绍:
The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep.
Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.