Evaluating the effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in treating very severe obstructive sleep apnea: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep and Breathing Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s11325-025-03249-8
Shirley Leibovitz, Shai Levi, Aiham Hanut, Robert Yanko, Yair Sharav, Yaron Haviv
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in treating very severe obstructive sleep apnea: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Shirley Leibovitz, Shai Levi, Aiham Hanut, Robert Yanko, Yair Sharav, Yaron Haviv","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03249-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The repeated airway obstructions in the common disorder Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) cause health risks. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), the standard treatment, faces adherence challenges. Mandibular Advancement Devices (MADs) have been used successfully for mild to moderate OSA, as a good alternative for these patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to evaluate the effectiveness of MADs in reducing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and improving symptoms in patients with very severe OSA unable to tolerate CPAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 22 patients with very severe OSA (AHI ≥ 50) treated with MADs. Baseline characteristics, including: age, sex, BMI, and AHI, were recorded, and changes in AHI following treatment were assessed. Adherence was monitored using patient-reported data. Unlike previous studies, this research focuses exclusively on the efficacy of MADs in treating patients with very severe OSA, a population often excluded from similar inspections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>median AHI significantly decreased from 60.0 (IQR: 57.0-65.0) to 15.0 (IQR: 10.0-24.0) after treatment (P < 0.001), with a mean reduction of 72.5% (± 14.3). Notably, 95.5% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in AHI. Symptom improvements, including reduced snoring and daytime tiredness, were reported by 72.7% of patients. BMI positively correlated with baseline AHI, and significant AHI reductions were observed across overweight and obese categories, although some patients remained in the severe AHI range post-treatment. Adherence varied, with 63.6% continuing to use the device.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MADs are effective in managing very severe OSA, providing significant reductions in AHI and symptom improvements. MADs may be a viable alternative for patients unable to tolerate CPAP. Further investigations into the long-term efficacy and impact on quality of life are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 1","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03249-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The repeated airway obstructions in the common disorder Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) cause health risks. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP), the standard treatment, faces adherence challenges. Mandibular Advancement Devices (MADs) have been used successfully for mild to moderate OSA, as a good alternative for these patients.

Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of MADs in reducing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and improving symptoms in patients with very severe OSA unable to tolerate CPAP.

Methods: This retrospective study included 22 patients with very severe OSA (AHI ≥ 50) treated with MADs. Baseline characteristics, including: age, sex, BMI, and AHI, were recorded, and changes in AHI following treatment were assessed. Adherence was monitored using patient-reported data. Unlike previous studies, this research focuses exclusively on the efficacy of MADs in treating patients with very severe OSA, a population often excluded from similar inspections.

Results: median AHI significantly decreased from 60.0 (IQR: 57.0-65.0) to 15.0 (IQR: 10.0-24.0) after treatment (P < 0.001), with a mean reduction of 72.5% (± 14.3). Notably, 95.5% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in AHI. Symptom improvements, including reduced snoring and daytime tiredness, were reported by 72.7% of patients. BMI positively correlated with baseline AHI, and significant AHI reductions were observed across overweight and obese categories, although some patients remained in the severe AHI range post-treatment. Adherence varied, with 63.6% continuing to use the device.

Conclusions: MADs are effective in managing very severe OSA, providing significant reductions in AHI and symptom improvements. MADs may be a viable alternative for patients unable to tolerate CPAP. Further investigations into the long-term efficacy and impact on quality of life are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估下颌推进装置治疗非常严重的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)常见病的反复气道阻塞可引起健康风险。持续气道正压通气(CPAP)作为一种标准治疗方法,面临着依从性的挑战。下颌推进装置(MADs)已成功用于轻度至中度OSA患者,是这些患者的良好选择。目的:评价MADs对不能耐受CPAP的极重度OSA患者降低呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)和改善症状的效果。方法:本回顾性研究纳入22例经MADs治疗的非常严重OSA (AHI≥50)患者。记录基线特征,包括:年龄、性别、BMI和AHI,并评估治疗后AHI的变化。使用患者报告的数据监测依从性。与以往的研究不同,本研究专门关注MADs治疗非常严重的OSA患者的疗效,这一人群通常被排除在类似的检查之外。结果:治疗后中位AHI从60.0 (IQR: 57.0-65.0)显著下降至15.0 (IQR: 10.0-24.0)。结论:MADs对治疗非常严重的OSA有效,可显著降低AHI并改善症状。对于不能耐受CPAP的患者,MADs可能是一种可行的替代方案。需要进一步调查其长期疗效和对生活质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep and Breathing
Sleep and Breathing 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep. Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
期刊最新文献
Association between obstructive sleep apnea and Tinnitus in the United States: NHANES 2005-2020. CaMKIIγ advances chronic intermittent hypoxia-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis via HIF-1 signaling pathway. Evaluating the effectiveness of mandibular advancement devices in treating very severe obstructive sleep apnea: a retrospective cohort study. Validation of a novel mask-based device for monitoring of comprehensive sleep parameters and sleep disordered breathing. Associations of fat, bone, and muscle indices with disease severity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1