Timing of vitrectomy for treatment of endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-VEGF injection: a systematic literature review of case reports and series.

IF 2.3 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158414241311064
Daniel J Hu, Sophia Ghauri, Magdalena G Krzystolik
{"title":"Timing of vitrectomy for treatment of endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-VEGF injection: a systematic literature review of case reports and series.","authors":"Daniel J Hu, Sophia Ghauri, Magdalena G Krzystolik","doi":"10.1177/25158414241311064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a systematic literature review analyzing visual outcomes of immediate, early, and delayed vitrectomy in the treatment of acute endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search using the Ovid Medline, Embase.com, and Web of Science databases, and relevant articles were selected from original English papers published from 2005 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting cases of acute post-anti-VEGF endophthalmitis, defined as occurring within 6 weeks of injection treatment. Exclusion criteria were pediatric cases and cases explicitly reported to be caused by injections of contaminated drugs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool for case reports and case series. The study dataset for descriptive and statistical analysis comprised patient-level data extracted from included studies. The timing of vitrectomy compared were defined as (1) immediate vitrectomy as occurring within 24 h of endophthalmitis diagnosis; (2) early vitrectomy as occurring between 24 and 48 h of endophthalmitis diagnosis; (3) late vitrectomy as occurring after 48 h of endophthalmitis diagnosis. Primary outcome was final visual acuity following treatment with vitrectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five articles were published that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria for a total of 86 cases. Thirty-seven were immediate vitrectomy, 25 were early, and 24 were late vitrectomy treatment groups, respectively. We observed differences in final visual outcomes and in improvement from diagnosis to final visual acuity, with patients receiving immediate and late vitrectomy to have better final visual outcomes than those patients receiving early vitrectomy (<i>p</i> < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results show that there may be an association between time to vitrectomy and visual outcomes. Immediate and late vitrectomy treatment groups had better visual outcomes than the early group. Our results were limited by the reliance on case reports and series and the paucity of data available specifying the timing of vitrectomy. Additional research is necessary to elucidate the effects of treatment timing in patients with endophthalmitis following anti-VEGF injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"25158414241311064"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414241311064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To perform a systematic literature review analyzing visual outcomes of immediate, early, and delayed vitrectomy in the treatment of acute endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections.

Methods: We conducted a literature search using the Ovid Medline, Embase.com, and Web of Science databases, and relevant articles were selected from original English papers published from 2005 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting cases of acute post-anti-VEGF endophthalmitis, defined as occurring within 6 weeks of injection treatment. Exclusion criteria were pediatric cases and cases explicitly reported to be caused by injections of contaminated drugs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool for case reports and case series. The study dataset for descriptive and statistical analysis comprised patient-level data extracted from included studies. The timing of vitrectomy compared were defined as (1) immediate vitrectomy as occurring within 24 h of endophthalmitis diagnosis; (2) early vitrectomy as occurring between 24 and 48 h of endophthalmitis diagnosis; (3) late vitrectomy as occurring after 48 h of endophthalmitis diagnosis. Primary outcome was final visual acuity following treatment with vitrectomy.

Results: Twenty-five articles were published that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria for a total of 86 cases. Thirty-seven were immediate vitrectomy, 25 were early, and 24 were late vitrectomy treatment groups, respectively. We observed differences in final visual outcomes and in improvement from diagnosis to final visual acuity, with patients receiving immediate and late vitrectomy to have better final visual outcomes than those patients receiving early vitrectomy (p < 0.005).

Conclusion: Our results show that there may be an association between time to vitrectomy and visual outcomes. Immediate and late vitrectomy treatment groups had better visual outcomes than the early group. Our results were limited by the reliance on case reports and series and the paucity of data available specifying the timing of vitrectomy. Additional research is necessary to elucidate the effects of treatment timing in patients with endophthalmitis following anti-VEGF injection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃体内注射抗vegf后玻璃体切除治疗眼内炎的时机:病例报告和系列的系统文献综述。
目的:对玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)后立即、早期和延迟玻璃体切除术治疗急性眼内炎的视力结果进行系统的文献回顾分析。方法:使用Ovid Medline、Embase.com和Web of Science数据库进行文献检索,选取2005 - 2021年发表的英文原版论文中的相关文章。纳入标准是报告急性抗vegf后眼内炎病例的研究,定义为在注射治疗后6周内发生。排除标准是儿科病例和明确报告因注射受污染药物引起的病例。使用案例报告和案例系列的乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估偏倚风险。用于描述性和统计分析的研究数据集包括从纳入研究中提取的患者水平数据。玻璃体切除术时间的比较定义为:(1)在眼内炎诊断后24小时内立即进行玻璃体切除术;(2)在眼内炎诊断后24 ~ 48小时内进行早期玻璃体切除术;(3)诊断为眼内炎48小时后进行玻璃体切除术。主要结果为玻璃体切除术后的最终视力。结果:共有25篇文章符合我们的纳入和排除标准,共86例。即刻玻璃体切除术治疗组37例,早期玻璃体切除术治疗组25例,晚期玻璃体切除术治疗组24例。我们观察到最终视力结果的差异以及从诊断到最终视力的改善,立即和晚期玻璃体切除术患者的最终视力结果优于早期玻璃体切除术患者(p结论:我们的结果表明玻璃体切除术时间与视力结果可能存在关联。即刻和晚期玻璃体切除术治疗组视力优于早期治疗组。我们的结果受限于病例报告和系列的依赖,以及指定玻璃体切除术时间的可用数据的缺乏。需要进一步的研究来阐明抗vegf注射后治疗时间对眼内炎患者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Charles Bonnet syndrome in patients with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: a cross-sectional study. Timing of vitrectomy for treatment of endophthalmitis after intravitreal anti-VEGF injection: a systematic literature review of case reports and series. Single minimal conjunctival incision for rectus muscles: a pilot feasibility study. Teleguided photocoagulation treatments across continents with a remotely programmed laser for retinal diseases. Real-world results of the Zeiss selective laser trabeculoplasty in adult South African primary open-angle glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1