Liesbeth Daniëls, Hanne Beeckmans, Andrea Zajacova, Pieterjan Kerckhof, Saskia Bos, Maarten Naesens, Bart Vanaudenaerde, Frans Claas, Robin Vos
{"title":"The Clinical Significance of HLA Compatibility Scores in Lung Transplantation.","authors":"Liesbeth Daniëls, Hanne Beeckmans, Andrea Zajacova, Pieterjan Kerckhof, Saskia Bos, Maarten Naesens, Bart Vanaudenaerde, Frans Claas, Robin Vos","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.13484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung transplantation is a life-saving therapeutic option for many chronic end-stage pulmonary diseases, but long-term survival may be limited by rejection of the transplanted organ. Since HLA disparity between donor and recipient plays a major role in rejection, we performed a single center, retrospective observational cohort analysis in our lung transplant cohort (n = 128) in which we calculated HLA compatibility scores for B-cell epitopes (HLAMatchmaker, HLA-EMMA), T-cell epitopes (PIRCHE-II) and missing self-induced NK cell activation (KIR Ligand Calculator). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between mismatched scores and time to development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) post-transplant, time to first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode, freedom from CLAD, graft survival and overall survival. For time to first DSA, HLA-EMMA DQB1 scores and PIRCHE-II DQB1 scores were significantly associated with more rapidly developing anti-HLA-DQ antibodies. HLA-EMMA DQB1 score was significantly associated with worse survival. KIR ligand Host-versus-Graft (HvG) mismatches was significantly associated with worse graft survival (CLAD or death) and shorter time to first biopsy-proven rejection when 2 mismatches were present. We demonstrated that HLA-DQB1 compatibility scores and KIR ligand HvG 2 mismatches may allow for identification of recipients at risk of poor long-term outcomes after lung transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"37 ","pages":"13484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11738610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lung transplantation is a life-saving therapeutic option for many chronic end-stage pulmonary diseases, but long-term survival may be limited by rejection of the transplanted organ. Since HLA disparity between donor and recipient plays a major role in rejection, we performed a single center, retrospective observational cohort analysis in our lung transplant cohort (n = 128) in which we calculated HLA compatibility scores for B-cell epitopes (HLAMatchmaker, HLA-EMMA), T-cell epitopes (PIRCHE-II) and missing self-induced NK cell activation (KIR Ligand Calculator). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between mismatched scores and time to development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) post-transplant, time to first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode, freedom from CLAD, graft survival and overall survival. For time to first DSA, HLA-EMMA DQB1 scores and PIRCHE-II DQB1 scores were significantly associated with more rapidly developing anti-HLA-DQ antibodies. HLA-EMMA DQB1 score was significantly associated with worse survival. KIR ligand Host-versus-Graft (HvG) mismatches was significantly associated with worse graft survival (CLAD or death) and shorter time to first biopsy-proven rejection when 2 mismatches were present. We demonstrated that HLA-DQB1 compatibility scores and KIR ligand HvG 2 mismatches may allow for identification of recipients at risk of poor long-term outcomes after lung transplantation.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.