The Clinical Significance of HLA Compatibility Scores in Lung Transplantation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Transplant International Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2024.13484
Liesbeth Daniëls, Hanne Beeckmans, Andrea Zajacova, Pieterjan Kerckhof, Saskia Bos, Maarten Naesens, Bart Vanaudenaerde, Frans Claas, Robin Vos
{"title":"The Clinical Significance of HLA Compatibility Scores in Lung Transplantation.","authors":"Liesbeth Daniëls, Hanne Beeckmans, Andrea Zajacova, Pieterjan Kerckhof, Saskia Bos, Maarten Naesens, Bart Vanaudenaerde, Frans Claas, Robin Vos","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.13484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung transplantation is a life-saving therapeutic option for many chronic end-stage pulmonary diseases, but long-term survival may be limited by rejection of the transplanted organ. Since HLA disparity between donor and recipient plays a major role in rejection, we performed a single center, retrospective observational cohort analysis in our lung transplant cohort (n = 128) in which we calculated HLA compatibility scores for B-cell epitopes (HLAMatchmaker, HLA-EMMA), T-cell epitopes (PIRCHE-II) and missing self-induced NK cell activation (KIR Ligand Calculator). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between mismatched scores and time to development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) post-transplant, time to first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode, freedom from CLAD, graft survival and overall survival. For time to first DSA, HLA-EMMA DQB1 scores and PIRCHE-II DQB1 scores were significantly associated with more rapidly developing anti-HLA-DQ antibodies. HLA-EMMA DQB1 score was significantly associated with worse survival. KIR ligand Host-versus-Graft (HvG) mismatches was significantly associated with worse graft survival (CLAD or death) and shorter time to first biopsy-proven rejection when 2 mismatches were present. We demonstrated that HLA-DQB1 compatibility scores and KIR ligand HvG 2 mismatches may allow for identification of recipients at risk of poor long-term outcomes after lung transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"37 ","pages":"13484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11738610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung transplantation is a life-saving therapeutic option for many chronic end-stage pulmonary diseases, but long-term survival may be limited by rejection of the transplanted organ. Since HLA disparity between donor and recipient plays a major role in rejection, we performed a single center, retrospective observational cohort analysis in our lung transplant cohort (n = 128) in which we calculated HLA compatibility scores for B-cell epitopes (HLAMatchmaker, HLA-EMMA), T-cell epitopes (PIRCHE-II) and missing self-induced NK cell activation (KIR Ligand Calculator). Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the association between mismatched scores and time to development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) post-transplant, time to first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode, freedom from CLAD, graft survival and overall survival. For time to first DSA, HLA-EMMA DQB1 scores and PIRCHE-II DQB1 scores were significantly associated with more rapidly developing anti-HLA-DQ antibodies. HLA-EMMA DQB1 score was significantly associated with worse survival. KIR ligand Host-versus-Graft (HvG) mismatches was significantly associated with worse graft survival (CLAD or death) and shorter time to first biopsy-proven rejection when 2 mismatches were present. We demonstrated that HLA-DQB1 compatibility scores and KIR ligand HvG 2 mismatches may allow for identification of recipients at risk of poor long-term outcomes after lung transplantation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HLA相容性评分在肺移植中的临床意义。
肺移植是许多慢性终末期肺部疾病的救命治疗选择,但移植器官的排斥反应可能限制长期生存。由于供体和受体之间的HLA差异在排斥反应中起主要作用,我们对肺移植队列(n = 128)进行了单中心、回顾性观察队列分析,计算了b细胞表位(HLAMatchmaker、HLA- emma)、t细胞表位(PIRCHE-II)和缺失的自我诱导NK细胞激活(KIR配体计算器)的HLA相容性评分。采用调整的Cox比例风险模型来研究不匹配评分与移植后供体特异性抗体(DSA)产生时间、首次活检证实的急性排斥反应发生时间、无CLAD、移植物生存和总生存之间的关系。对于首次DSA的时间,HLA-EMMA DQB1评分和PIRCHE-II DQB1评分与更快发展的抗hla - dq抗体显著相关。HLA-EMMA DQB1评分与较差的生存率显著相关。KIR配体宿主-移植物(HvG)错配与更差的移植物存活(CLAD或死亡)和更短的时间到第一次活检证实的排斥反应存在显著相关。我们证明HLA-DQB1相容性评分和KIR配体HvG 2错配可能允许识别肺移植后长期预后不良风险的受体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
期刊最新文献
A Global Survey of Self-Reported Cancer Screening Practices by Health Professionals for Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients. Pre-Transplant Hypoalbuminemia Is Not Associated With Early Key Outcomes Among Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplant Recipients. Potential Infectious Complications in Pig Xenograft Donors and Recipients. 2024: A Year in Review. The Evolution of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Pig-to-Nonhuman Primate Organ Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1