Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Inclisiran for the Treatment of Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia in Singapore.

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Value in health regional issues Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101067
Yan Ling Lim, Ru-San Tan, Kian Keong Poh, Xiao Jun Wang
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Inclisiran for the Treatment of Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia in Singapore.","authors":"Yan Ling Lim, Ru-San Tan, Kian Keong Poh, Xiao Jun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of inclisiran plus standard of care (SoC; comprising statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate) in primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia from a Singapore healthcare system perspective. Inclisiran + SoC was separately compared with SoC, alirocumab + SoC, and evolocumab + SoC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A lifetime Markov model in the United Kingdom (UK) was adapted to the Singapore setting. The modeled population (comprising 4 separate subpopulations: \"primary prevention heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia [HeFH],\" \"secondary prevention HeFH,\" \"atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD],\" \"primary prevention with elevated risk\") and efficacy of inclisiran were informed by the ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11 trials. Comparative efficacies of inclisiran versus comparators were informed by a network meta-analysis. Baseline cardiovascular event risks were obtained from a large UK real-world data set and the Netherlands, and UK-based utilities were applied. Baseline population characteristics, distribution of patients in the ASCVD subpopulation, and costs were sourced from local clinicians and published literature. A willingness-to-pay threshold of S$45 000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all subpopulations, inclisiran + SoC resulted in higher QALYs and total costs than SoC (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, S$35 658-163 896/QALY) and dominated evolocumab + SoC and alirocumab + SoC. At the selected threshold, inclisiran + SoC is cost-effective among patients with ASCVD and secondary prevention HeFH. The deterministic sensitivity analysis found that the model was most sensitive to inclisiran's acquisition cost and efficacy and rate ratios translating reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels to the risk of cardiovascular death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with SoC, evolocumab + SoC, and alirocumab + SoC, inclisiran + SoC is cost-effective in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia in Singapore at the selected threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":" ","pages":"101067"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of inclisiran plus standard of care (SoC; comprising statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate) in primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia from a Singapore healthcare system perspective. Inclisiran + SoC was separately compared with SoC, alirocumab + SoC, and evolocumab + SoC.

Methods: A lifetime Markov model in the United Kingdom (UK) was adapted to the Singapore setting. The modeled population (comprising 4 separate subpopulations: "primary prevention heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia [HeFH]," "secondary prevention HeFH," "atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD]," "primary prevention with elevated risk") and efficacy of inclisiran were informed by the ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11 trials. Comparative efficacies of inclisiran versus comparators were informed by a network meta-analysis. Baseline cardiovascular event risks were obtained from a large UK real-world data set and the Netherlands, and UK-based utilities were applied. Baseline population characteristics, distribution of patients in the ASCVD subpopulation, and costs were sourced from local clinicians and published literature. A willingness-to-pay threshold of S$45 000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was selected.

Results: Across all subpopulations, inclisiran + SoC resulted in higher QALYs and total costs than SoC (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, S$35 658-163 896/QALY) and dominated evolocumab + SoC and alirocumab + SoC. At the selected threshold, inclisiran + SoC is cost-effective among patients with ASCVD and secondary prevention HeFH. The deterministic sensitivity analysis found that the model was most sensitive to inclisiran's acquisition cost and efficacy and rate ratios translating reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels to the risk of cardiovascular death.

Conclusions: Compared with SoC, evolocumab + SoC, and alirocumab + SoC, inclisiran + SoC is cost-effective in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia in Singapore at the selected threshold.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新加坡,Inclisiran治疗原发性高胆固醇血症或混合性血脂异常的成本-效果分析
目的:本分析评估了inclisiran加标准护理(SoC;包括他汀类药物,依折替贝和非诺贝特)原发性高胆固醇血症或混合性血脂异常从新加坡医疗保健系统的角度。将Inclisiran + SoC分别与SoC、alirocumab + SoC和evolocumab + SoC进行比较。方法:将英国的终身马尔可夫模型应用于新加坡环境。模型人群(包括4个独立的亚人群:“一级预防杂合性家族性高胆固醇血症[HeFH]”、“二级预防HeFH”、“动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病[ASCVD]”、“高危一级预防”)和inclisiran的疗效由ORION-9、ORION-10和ORION-11试验获得。通过网络荟萃分析得知inclisiran与比较剂的比较疗效。基线心血管事件风险来自英国和荷兰的大型真实数据集,并应用了英国的公用事业。基线人群特征、ASCVD亚群患者分布和费用来源于当地临床医生和已发表的文献。选择了45 000新元/质量调整生命年(QALY)的支付意愿阈值。结果:在所有亚群中,inclisiran + SoC的QALYs和总成本高于SoC(增量成本-效果比,35 658-163 896新元/QALY),并主导evolocumab + SoC和alirocumab + SoC。在选择的阈值下,inclisiran + SoC在ASCVD和二级预防HeFH患者中具有成本效益。确定性敏感性分析发现,该模型对inclisiran的获取成本和有效性以及将低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平的降低转化为心血管死亡风险的比率最为敏感。结论:与SoC、evolocumab + SoC和alirocumab + SoC相比,在选定的阈值下,inclisiran + SoC对新加坡原发性高胆固醇血症或混合性血脂异常患者具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Glycemic and Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Disability Costs Covered by Social Security, Evidence From Mexico. Rare Oncological Diseases and Their Large Slice in Demands to the Brazilian Government for Health Technologies Over 12 Years Since the Creation of CONITEC: Doenças Oncológicas Raras e Sua Grande Parcela Nas Demandas Por Tecnologias em Saúde ao Governo Brasileiro ao Longo de Doze Anos Desde a Criação da CONITEC. Healthcare Costs and Early Complications in Liver-Transplanted Patients With Portal Vein Thrombosis: Experience From a Colombian Reference Center. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Inclisiran for the Treatment of Primary Hypercholesterolemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia in Singapore. Efficiency Analysis of Healthcare Systems in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: An Application Based on Data Envelopment Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1