Evaluation of the personality disorder positive outcomes programme (PDPOP) in general practice.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0196
Hayley Trueman, Matt Williams, Robin Schafer, Fiona Blyth
{"title":"Evaluation of the personality disorder positive outcomes programme (PDPOP) in general practice.","authors":"Hayley Trueman, Matt Williams, Robin Schafer, Fiona Blyth","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>GPs and primary care services have been identified as crucial to the care of people with personality disorder. Individuals living with personality disorder frequently face stigma and difficulties when accessing healthcare. Primary care staff often describe feeling demoralised, incompetent, hurt or angry after difficult interactions with patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of PDPOP training delivered to 10 GP practices in 2022-23.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>PDPOP is a co-produced training course aimed at all staff within GP surgeries to help teams, including administrative, reception and clinical staff, to feel confident and skilled when interacting with patients who may have personality disorder.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The New World Kirkpatrick Model was used to evaluate the training, through questionnaires pre- training, post-training, at follow-up, and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluation found that practice teams were highly satisfied with PDPOP training and found it relevant, engaging and useful. Results demonstrated that staff felt more confident and skilled when interacting with patients who may have personality disorder through use of the training's core concepts. Increased confidence in managing distress, crisis and participant's own emotions, was associated with reduced impact on staff at interview. Practices also demonstrated action taken post-training to reduce dependency on primary care services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By including lived-experience trainers and introducing core concepts, PDPOP has demonstrated a sustained positive impact on primary care teams. Further expansion of this type of training may help to increase the confidence of healthcare staff in delivering care to patients with personality disorder and similar complex emotional needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: GPs and primary care services have been identified as crucial to the care of people with personality disorder. Individuals living with personality disorder frequently face stigma and difficulties when accessing healthcare. Primary care staff often describe feeling demoralised, incompetent, hurt or angry after difficult interactions with patients.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of PDPOP training delivered to 10 GP practices in 2022-23.

Design & setting: PDPOP is a co-produced training course aimed at all staff within GP surgeries to help teams, including administrative, reception and clinical staff, to feel confident and skilled when interacting with patients who may have personality disorder.

Method: The New World Kirkpatrick Model was used to evaluate the training, through questionnaires pre- training, post-training, at follow-up, and semi-structured interviews.

Results: Evaluation found that practice teams were highly satisfied with PDPOP training and found it relevant, engaging and useful. Results demonstrated that staff felt more confident and skilled when interacting with patients who may have personality disorder through use of the training's core concepts. Increased confidence in managing distress, crisis and participant's own emotions, was associated with reduced impact on staff at interview. Practices also demonstrated action taken post-training to reduce dependency on primary care services.

Conclusion: By including lived-experience trainers and introducing core concepts, PDPOP has demonstrated a sustained positive impact on primary care teams. Further expansion of this type of training may help to increase the confidence of healthcare staff in delivering care to patients with personality disorder and similar complex emotional needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人格障碍积极结果方案(PDPOP)在全科实践中的评估。
背景:全科医生和初级保健服务被认为对人格障碍患者的护理至关重要。患有人格障碍的个人在获得医疗保健时经常面临耻辱和困难。初级保健工作人员经常描述在与病人发生困难的互动后感到士气低落、无能、受伤或愤怒。目的:评价2022-23年对10家全科医生实施PDPOP培训的效果。设计与设置:PDPOP是一个联合制作的培训课程,针对全科医生外科的所有员工,帮助团队,包括行政,接待和临床工作人员,在与可能患有人格障碍的患者互动时感到自信和熟练。方法:采用新世界Kirkpatrick模型,通过培训前问卷、培训后问卷、随访问卷和半结构化访谈对培训进行评估。结果:评估发现实践团队对PDPOP培训非常满意,认为培训具有相关性、参与性和实用性。结果表明,通过使用培训的核心概念,员工在与可能患有人格障碍的患者互动时感到更加自信和熟练。在处理痛苦、危机和参与者自身情绪方面的信心增强,与减少对面试人员的影响有关。实践还表明,培训后为减少对初级保健服务的依赖而采取的行动。结论:通过引入现场体验培训师和核心概念,PDPOP对初级保健团队产生了持续的积极影响。进一步扩大这种类型的培训可能有助于增加医护人员在为患有人格障碍和类似复杂情感需求的患者提供护理方面的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
The association between coding for chronic kidney disease and kidney replacement therapy incidence at CCG-level in England: an ecological study. Lifestyle interventions for depression in primary care: a qualitative study. Factors associated with link workers considering leaving their role: a cross-sectional survey. Adjusting primary-care funding by deprivation: a cross-sectional study of Lower layer Super Output Areas in England. Identifying impaired mental health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1