Comparison of Sequencing-by-Synthesis and Avidity Base Chemistry Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms in Identifying Somatic Variants of Hematological Malignancies.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfaf006
Min Hui Lim, Juwuk Kim, Zheng Jin Tu, Yu-Wei Cheng
{"title":"Comparison of Sequencing-by-Synthesis and Avidity Base Chemistry Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms in Identifying Somatic Variants of Hematological Malignancies.","authors":"Min Hui Lim, Juwuk Kim, Zheng Jin Tu, Yu-Wei Cheng","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates the performance of the Illumina NextSeq™ 550 and the Element Biosciences AVITI™ next-generation sequencing (NGS) system, in detecting single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and gene fusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A set of 66 NGS libraries, consisting of 33 DNA, 24 cDNA, and triplicates of 3 control libraries, were prepared from bone marrow samples targeting 63 genes and related fusions, and initially sequenced using the NextSeq 550 in the Cleveland Clinic's molecular diagnostic laboratory. The same libraries were subsequently sequenced on the AVITI. The resulting data were analyzed using a combination of Cleveland Clinic developed pipelines and ArcherDx virtual machine software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that all 105 SNVs and 39 gene fusions identified by the NextSeq 550 were also detected in the AVITI, demonstrating a high degree of concordance between the platforms. The analyses revealed R2 values of 0.86 for read depth and 0.96 for VAF of the 105 DNA variants, and 0.95 for read depth and 0.97 for fusion percentage of the 39 fusion variants. In the reproducibility studies, the VAF and fusion percentage of all variants were within 2 standard deviations of the mean when the same positive controls were sequenced 3 times on the AVITI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that the NextSeq 550 and the AVITI provide comparable performance in terms of accuracy and sensitivity for variant detection. Notably, the AVITI chemistry requires substantially lower PhiX input than the NextSeq 550 needs for this application. This results in substantial cost and efficiency benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"679-690"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the performance of the Illumina NextSeq™ 550 and the Element Biosciences AVITI™ next-generation sequencing (NGS) system, in detecting single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and gene fusions.

Methods: A set of 66 NGS libraries, consisting of 33 DNA, 24 cDNA, and triplicates of 3 control libraries, were prepared from bone marrow samples targeting 63 genes and related fusions, and initially sequenced using the NextSeq 550 in the Cleveland Clinic's molecular diagnostic laboratory. The same libraries were subsequently sequenced on the AVITI. The resulting data were analyzed using a combination of Cleveland Clinic developed pipelines and ArcherDx virtual machine software.

Results: The study found that all 105 SNVs and 39 gene fusions identified by the NextSeq 550 were also detected in the AVITI, demonstrating a high degree of concordance between the platforms. The analyses revealed R2 values of 0.86 for read depth and 0.96 for VAF of the 105 DNA variants, and 0.95 for read depth and 0.97 for fusion percentage of the 39 fusion variants. In the reproducibility studies, the VAF and fusion percentage of all variants were within 2 standard deviations of the mean when the same positive controls were sequenced 3 times on the AVITI.

Conclusions: These results indicate that the NextSeq 550 and the AVITI provide comparable performance in terms of accuracy and sensitivity for variant detection. Notably, the AVITI chemistry requires substantially lower PhiX input than the NextSeq 550 needs for this application. This results in substantial cost and efficiency benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合成测序与Avidity碱基化学新一代测序平台在血液系统恶性肿瘤体细胞变异鉴定中的比较
背景:本研究评估了Illumina NextSeq™550和Element Biosciences AVITI™下一代测序(NGS)系统在检测单核苷酸变异(snv)和基因融合方面的性能。方法:从针对63个基因及其融合的骨髓样本中制备66个NGS文库,包括33个DNA、24个cDNA和3个对照文库的3个副本,并使用克利夫兰诊所分子诊断实验室的NextSeq 550进行初步测序。随后在AVITI上对相同的文库进行测序。结果数据使用克利夫兰诊所开发的管道和ArcherDx虚拟机软件进行分析。结果:研究发现,NextSeq 550鉴定的105个snv和39个基因融合在AVITI中也被检测到,表明平台之间具有高度的一致性。分析显示105个DNA变异的读取深度和VAF的R2值为0.86,39个融合变异的读取深度和融合百分比的R2值为0.95和0.97。在可重复性研究中,当同一阳性对照在AVITI上测序3次时,所有变异的VAF和融合率均在平均值的2个标准差以内。结论:这些结果表明NextSeq 550和AVITI在变异检测的准确性和灵敏度方面具有相当的性能。值得注意的是,与NextSeq 550相比,AVITI化学所需的PhiX输入量要低得多。这将带来巨大的成本和效率效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
A Diagnostic Odyssey in a Family with Multiple Osteochondromas. Commentary on A Diagnostic Odyssey in a Family with Multiple Osteochondromas. Analytical Performance Evaluation of the Cardiac Troponin T High Sensitivity Gen 6 Assay. Potassium Reference Intervals: A Need for Separate Reference Intervals for Serum and Plasma. Commentary on Delayed Diagnosis of a Rare Metabolic Disorder in Adulthood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1