Impact of Infertility and Medically Assisted Reproduction Treatments on Female Sexuality.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20240100
Badra Bannour, Darine Salem, Rania Bannour, Omar Khalil Ben Saad, Imen Bannour
{"title":"Impact of Infertility and Medically Assisted Reproduction Treatments on Female Sexuality.","authors":"Badra Bannour, Darine Salem, Rania Bannour, Omar Khalil Ben Saad, Imen Bannour","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of infertility and Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP) on female sexuality. Human sexuality presents a multifaceted complexity, shaped by diverse factors and individual intricacies. Infertility and assisted reproductive treatments entail a prolonged and arduous journey, amplifying pre-existing sexual dysfunctions and serving as a rigorous trial of the affected women's sexuality and the resilience of couples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective descriptive comparative study with an analytical section, involving 140 female participants: 70 with infertility undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment, and 70 who are fertile and had no prior history of conceiving problems. The evaluation of the sexual function of the two groups was conducted using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The infertile group exhibited a higher level of marital adjustment compared to the fertile cohort. A majority of participants within the infertile cohort (51.4%) presented with primary infertility and (48.6%) experiencing secondary infertility. A marginal elevation in the frequency of sexual intercourse among infertile participants was observed. The mean global score of female sexual function was (21.57±3.36) in the infertile group, which was significantly lower compared to (24.46±1.97) in the fertile group. Notably, both scores fell within the criteria for high risk of sexual dysfunction. The difference between the two groups was significant for all dimensions of FSFI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Infertility and its treatments pose challenges to female sexuality, often leading to sexual dysfunction. Thus, counseling and sexological support are crucial during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of infertility and Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP) on female sexuality. Human sexuality presents a multifaceted complexity, shaped by diverse factors and individual intricacies. Infertility and assisted reproductive treatments entail a prolonged and arduous journey, amplifying pre-existing sexual dysfunctions and serving as a rigorous trial of the affected women's sexuality and the resilience of couples.

Methods: This is a prospective descriptive comparative study with an analytical section, involving 140 female participants: 70 with infertility undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment, and 70 who are fertile and had no prior history of conceiving problems. The evaluation of the sexual function of the two groups was conducted using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score.

Results: The infertile group exhibited a higher level of marital adjustment compared to the fertile cohort. A majority of participants within the infertile cohort (51.4%) presented with primary infertility and (48.6%) experiencing secondary infertility. A marginal elevation in the frequency of sexual intercourse among infertile participants was observed. The mean global score of female sexual function was (21.57±3.36) in the infertile group, which was significantly lower compared to (24.46±1.97) in the fertile group. Notably, both scores fell within the criteria for high risk of sexual dysfunction. The difference between the two groups was significant for all dimensions of FSFI.

Conclusions: Infertility and its treatments pose challenges to female sexuality, often leading to sexual dysfunction. Thus, counseling and sexological support are crucial during treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不孕不育和医学辅助生殖治疗对女性性行为的影响。
目的:探讨不孕症和医学辅助生殖(MAP)对女性性行为的影响。人类的性表现出多方面的复杂性,受到各种因素和个体复杂性的影响。不孕症和辅助生殖治疗需要一个漫长而艰苦的过程,放大了先前存在的性功能障碍,并成为对受影响妇女的性行为和夫妇的恢复能力的严格考验。方法:这是一项具有分析部分的前瞻性描述性比较研究,涉及140名女性参与者:70名接受辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗的不孕症患者,70名生育且无妊娠史的女性。采用女性性功能指数(FSFI)评分对两组患者的性功能进行评价。结果:不育组的婚姻调整水平高于可育组。不孕队列中的大多数参与者(51.4%)表现为原发性不孕,(48.6%)表现为继发性不孕。在不孕症参与者中观察到性交频率的边际升高。不孕组女性性功能总分平均为(21.57±3.36)分,明显低于生育组的(24.46±1.97)分。值得注意的是,这两个分数都落在性功能障碍高风险的标准之内。两组间FSFI各维度差异均有统计学意义。结论:不孕症及其治疗对女性性功能构成挑战,常导致性功能障碍。因此,在治疗过程中,咨询和性学支持是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Analyzing free fatty acids in seminal plasma from asthenozoospermia patients undergoing antioxidant therapy. Elective fertility preservation before and after the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak. Live births after vaginal progesterone Cyclogest suppository versus Crinone gel for luteal phase support following cleavage and blastocyst cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET); a retrospective comparative study. The endometrioma paradox. Embryo Cryopreservation: What do couples think about it?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1