Policy analysis: Key milestones in MDR-TB management over the past decade in South Africa.

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v15i1.703
Lee-Ann C Davids, Talitha Crowley
{"title":"Policy analysis: Key milestones in MDR-TB management over the past decade in South Africa.","authors":"Lee-Ann C Davids, Talitha Crowley","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v15i1.703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Significant strides have been made globally and in South Africa (SA) in the policy and biomedical management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, MDR-TB remains a significant public health threat.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This policy content analysis aims to explore the key milestones in MDR-TB management in SA and globally over the last decade, 2013-2023, to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This review focussed on global and South African national MDR-TB policies since SA is on all three World Health Organization (WHO) watch lists for TB, TB/HIV and MDR-TB, despite its significant contributions to policy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A policy review and content analysis were conducted of all publicly available SA and WHO drug-resistant TB policies developed between 2013 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key changes identified were in the areas of new drug development and regimens, care delivery settings, task shifting and, terminology used in the field of drug-resistant TB. Changes in the biomedical sphere predominated in both SA and WHO policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Important biomedical interventions have offered renewed hope for the SA MDR-TB programme. This review highlights that policy translation and implementation in non-biomedical interventions have been slow, sometimes lagging up to 10 years behind an intervention being recommended. This article recommends equal weight be placed on non-biomedical interventions and that these policy translations occur at a more rapid speed to positively impact the dire public health consequences of MDR-TB.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Insights offered through this policy review may contribute to policy development, translation and implementation towards improving MDR-TB outcomes in SA.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"15 1","pages":"703"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v15i1.703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Significant strides have been made globally and in South Africa (SA) in the policy and biomedical management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, MDR-TB remains a significant public health threat.

Aim: This policy content analysis aims to explore the key milestones in MDR-TB management in SA and globally over the last decade, 2013-2023, to identify gaps and opportunities for improvement.

Setting: This review focussed on global and South African national MDR-TB policies since SA is on all three World Health Organization (WHO) watch lists for TB, TB/HIV and MDR-TB, despite its significant contributions to policy.

Method: A policy review and content analysis were conducted of all publicly available SA and WHO drug-resistant TB policies developed between 2013 and 2023.

Results: Key changes identified were in the areas of new drug development and regimens, care delivery settings, task shifting and, terminology used in the field of drug-resistant TB. Changes in the biomedical sphere predominated in both SA and WHO policies.

Conclusion: Important biomedical interventions have offered renewed hope for the SA MDR-TB programme. This review highlights that policy translation and implementation in non-biomedical interventions have been slow, sometimes lagging up to 10 years behind an intervention being recommended. This article recommends equal weight be placed on non-biomedical interventions and that these policy translations occur at a more rapid speed to positively impact the dire public health consequences of MDR-TB.

Contribution: Insights offered through this policy review may contribute to policy development, translation and implementation towards improving MDR-TB outcomes in SA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策分析:南非过去十年耐多药结核病管理的关键里程碑。
背景:全球和南非在耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)的政策和生物医学管理方面取得了重大进展。然而,耐多药结核病仍然是一个重大的公共卫生威胁。目的:本政策内容分析旨在探讨过去十年(2013-2023年)南非和全球耐多药结核病管理的关键里程碑,以确定差距和改进机会。背景:本次审查的重点是全球和南非国家耐多药结核病政策,因为南非在结核病、结核病/艾滋病毒和耐多药结核病三个世界卫生组织(WHO)观察名单上,尽管它对政策做出了重大贡献。方法:对2013 - 2023年所有公开的SA和WHO制定的耐药结核病政策进行政策回顾和内容分析。结果:确定的关键变化是在新药开发和方案、护理提供环境、任务转移以及耐药结核病领域使用的术语方面。在SA和世卫组织的政策中,生物医学领域的变化占主导地位。结论:重要的生物医学干预措施为SA耐多药结核病规划带来了新的希望。这篇综述强调,非生物医学干预措施的政策转化和实施一直很缓慢,有时比建议的干预措施落后长达10年。本文建议同等重视非生物医学干预措施,并以更快的速度进行这些政策转化,以积极影响耐多药结核病的可怕公共卫生后果。贡献:通过本政策审查提供的见解可能有助于政策制定、翻译和实施,以改善南南非的耐多药结核病结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
期刊最新文献
Policy analysis: Key milestones in MDR-TB management over the past decade in South Africa. Leveraging digital health systems maturity assessments to guide strategic priorities. Improving transparency in malaria programme funds: A business case for connected diagnostics in Kenya. Publishing in the Journal of Public Health in Africa: Advancing research for future pandemics. Improved cholera control in Kenya: A retrospective analysis of 2017-2019 in Nairobi and Homabay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1