Bárbara Pedrosa, Graça Cardoso, Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Ugnė Grigaitė, Deborah Aluh, Margarida Dias, Manuela Silva, José Caldas-de-Almeida
{"title":"Experiences and expectations of residents and professionals of supported accommodations for people with serious mental disorders in Portugal.","authors":"Bárbara Pedrosa, Graça Cardoso, Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Ugnė Grigaitė, Deborah Aluh, Margarida Dias, Manuela Silva, José Caldas-de-Almeida","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02818-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Most studies on supported accommodations (SAs) for people with serious mental disorders have focused on effectiveness. Very few analysed the experiences and expectations of residents and professionals of SAs, which is fundamental to improving care. This study aimed to explore in depth the perspectives of residents and professionals of SAs in Portugal regarding the residents' previous contacts with mental health services, current experiences, and expectations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A purposeful sample of 11 residents and 11 professionals from 11 different organisations managing SAs in Portugal was included. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using interview guides to assess previous experiences with mental health services, expectations, and suggestions to improve care. Thematic analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Residents had a long history of mental health problems and contact with mental health services. Most had been referred to SAs due to poor family or social conditions. The majority of residents expected to stay at the SAs in the long-term, and did not mention major suggestions to improve. Professionals suggested several improvements, such as having more time allocation to work with the residents and revising maximum limits of lengths of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residents are seldom involved in decision-making. However, most were satisfied with care and hoped to remain in the SAs. Implications of this study apply to the political level (regarding the financing of SAs and the provision of community mental health care and other social supports) and to the clinical level (regarding training and family interventions).</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02818-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Most studies on supported accommodations (SAs) for people with serious mental disorders have focused on effectiveness. Very few analysed the experiences and expectations of residents and professionals of SAs, which is fundamental to improving care. This study aimed to explore in depth the perspectives of residents and professionals of SAs in Portugal regarding the residents' previous contacts with mental health services, current experiences, and expectations.
Methods: A purposeful sample of 11 residents and 11 professionals from 11 different organisations managing SAs in Portugal was included. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using interview guides to assess previous experiences with mental health services, expectations, and suggestions to improve care. Thematic analysis was used.
Findings: Residents had a long history of mental health problems and contact with mental health services. Most had been referred to SAs due to poor family or social conditions. The majority of residents expected to stay at the SAs in the long-term, and did not mention major suggestions to improve. Professionals suggested several improvements, such as having more time allocation to work with the residents and revising maximum limits of lengths of stay.
Conclusions: Residents are seldom involved in decision-making. However, most were satisfied with care and hoped to remain in the SAs. Implications of this study apply to the political level (regarding the financing of SAs and the provision of community mental health care and other social supports) and to the clinical level (regarding training and family interventions).
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.