Experiences and expectations of residents and professionals of supported accommodations for people with serious mental disorders in Portugal.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s00127-025-02818-2
Bárbara Pedrosa, Graça Cardoso, Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Ugnė Grigaitė, Deborah Aluh, Margarida Dias, Manuela Silva, José Caldas-de-Almeida
{"title":"Experiences and expectations of residents and professionals of supported accommodations for people with serious mental disorders in Portugal.","authors":"Bárbara Pedrosa, Graça Cardoso, Manuel Gonçalves-Pereira, Ugnė Grigaitė, Deborah Aluh, Margarida Dias, Manuela Silva, José Caldas-de-Almeida","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02818-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Most studies on supported accommodations (SAs) for people with serious mental disorders have focused on effectiveness. Very few analysed the experiences and expectations of residents and professionals of SAs, which is fundamental to improving care. This study aimed to explore in depth the perspectives of residents and professionals of SAs in Portugal regarding the residents' previous contacts with mental health services, current experiences, and expectations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A purposeful sample of 11 residents and 11 professionals from 11 different organisations managing SAs in Portugal was included. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using interview guides to assess previous experiences with mental health services, expectations, and suggestions to improve care. Thematic analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Residents had a long history of mental health problems and contact with mental health services. Most had been referred to SAs due to poor family or social conditions. The majority of residents expected to stay at the SAs in the long-term, and did not mention major suggestions to improve. Professionals suggested several improvements, such as having more time allocation to work with the residents and revising maximum limits of lengths of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residents are seldom involved in decision-making. However, most were satisfied with care and hoped to remain in the SAs. Implications of this study apply to the political level (regarding the financing of SAs and the provision of community mental health care and other social supports) and to the clinical level (regarding training and family interventions).</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02818-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Most studies on supported accommodations (SAs) for people with serious mental disorders have focused on effectiveness. Very few analysed the experiences and expectations of residents and professionals of SAs, which is fundamental to improving care. This study aimed to explore in depth the perspectives of residents and professionals of SAs in Portugal regarding the residents' previous contacts with mental health services, current experiences, and expectations.

Methods: A purposeful sample of 11 residents and 11 professionals from 11 different organisations managing SAs in Portugal was included. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using interview guides to assess previous experiences with mental health services, expectations, and suggestions to improve care. Thematic analysis was used.

Findings: Residents had a long history of mental health problems and contact with mental health services. Most had been referred to SAs due to poor family or social conditions. The majority of residents expected to stay at the SAs in the long-term, and did not mention major suggestions to improve. Professionals suggested several improvements, such as having more time allocation to work with the residents and revising maximum limits of lengths of stay.

Conclusions: Residents are seldom involved in decision-making. However, most were satisfied with care and hoped to remain in the SAs. Implications of this study apply to the political level (regarding the financing of SAs and the provision of community mental health care and other social supports) and to the clinical level (regarding training and family interventions).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙严重精神障碍患者支持住宿的居民和专业人员的经验和期望。
目的:大多数关于严重精神障碍患者支持住宿(SAs)的研究都集中在有效性上。很少有人分析了急救人员和专业人员的经验和期望,这是改善护理的基础。本研究旨在深入探讨葡萄牙心理健康服务的居民和专业人员对居民与心理健康服务的接触、目前的经验和期望的看法。方法:有目的的样本包括11名居民和11名专业人员从11个不同的组织在葡萄牙管理sa。采用访谈指南进行半结构化访谈,以评估以往的精神卫生服务经验、期望和改善护理的建议。采用专题分析。调查结果:居民有较长的心理健康问题史,与心理健康服务有接触。由于贫困的家庭或社会条件,大多数人被转介到sa。大部分居民预期会长期留在安全设施内,并没有提及需要改善的主要建议。专家们提出了一些改进建议,比如有更多的时间与居民一起工作,以及修改逗留时间的上限。结论:居民很少参与决策。然而,大多数人对服役感到满意,并希望继续留在SAs。本研究的意义适用于政治层面(关于社会辅助服务的资助、社区精神卫生保健和其他社会支持的提供)和临床层面(关于培训和家庭干预)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
期刊最新文献
Mental health and help-seeking behaviors among Mozambican youth: insights from a post-pandemic National Survey Amidst Internal Conflict. Interventions supporting meaningful connections for people with serious mental illness: a concept-framed systematic narrative review. Experiences and expectations of residents and professionals of supported accommodations for people with serious mental disorders in Portugal. Social inequalities in youth mental health in Canada, 2007-2022: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study. Correction: Clarifying the relationship between insecure attachment and problematic social media use across platforms: a network analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1