Trends in syphilis seroreactivity among blood donors: A 17-year retrospective analysis and follow-up at a tertiary care hospital.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion and Apheresis Science Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2025.104068
Kshitija Mittal, Paramjit Kaur, Ravneet Kaur, Gagandeep Kaur, Arpita Parmar, Shivangi Sharma
{"title":"Trends in syphilis seroreactivity among blood donors: A 17-year retrospective analysis and follow-up at a tertiary care hospital.","authors":"Kshitija Mittal, Paramjit Kaur, Ravneet Kaur, Gagandeep Kaur, Arpita Parmar, Shivangi Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2025.104068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the seroprevalence of syphilis among blood donors, evaluate the response rate of seroreactive donors, and investigate high-risk behaviors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study presents a retrospective analysis of syphilis seroreactivity among blood donors over a 17 year period. Blood donations were screened for syphilis using the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) card test. RPR-reactive blood units were discarded, and donors were notified for follow-up. A detailed history was obtained, including prior syphilis diagnoses, sexual practices, and potential high-risk activities. The donors who were repeatedly RPR reactive were referred for further confirmatory management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 569 (0.20 %) donors were found RPR reactive. A non-linear trend was observed between RPR reactivity and study period, donor age and donation status. RPR reactivity was significantly higher in repeat blood donors (p < 0.001). The mean donor return rate was significantly higher following introduction of phone calls along with letters for donor notification compared to notification via letters only (p < 0.001). Forty-five percent (n = 241) donors returned for repeat sample testing. Of these, 19 % (n = 45) tested negative on repeat RPR testing while 81.3 % (n = 196) remained RPR reactive and were referred for further management. On follow up of the latter group, 43.9 % (n = 86) donors were negative on confirmatory testing indicating biological false positives while 56.1 % (n = 110) donors were positive on confirmatory testing and were true positives. Of true positive donors, 90.9 % of donors reported engaging in high risk sexual behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need to update syphilis screening guidelines in developing countries like India, incorporating combination testing to improve the accuracy of syphilis detection in blood donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"64 2","pages":"104068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2025.104068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: This study aimed to assess the seroprevalence of syphilis among blood donors, evaluate the response rate of seroreactive donors, and investigate high-risk behaviors.

Material and methods: The study presents a retrospective analysis of syphilis seroreactivity among blood donors over a 17 year period. Blood donations were screened for syphilis using the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) card test. RPR-reactive blood units were discarded, and donors were notified for follow-up. A detailed history was obtained, including prior syphilis diagnoses, sexual practices, and potential high-risk activities. The donors who were repeatedly RPR reactive were referred for further confirmatory management.

Results: A total of 569 (0.20 %) donors were found RPR reactive. A non-linear trend was observed between RPR reactivity and study period, donor age and donation status. RPR reactivity was significantly higher in repeat blood donors (p < 0.001). The mean donor return rate was significantly higher following introduction of phone calls along with letters for donor notification compared to notification via letters only (p < 0.001). Forty-five percent (n = 241) donors returned for repeat sample testing. Of these, 19 % (n = 45) tested negative on repeat RPR testing while 81.3 % (n = 196) remained RPR reactive and were referred for further management. On follow up of the latter group, 43.9 % (n = 86) donors were negative on confirmatory testing indicating biological false positives while 56.1 % (n = 110) donors were positive on confirmatory testing and were true positives. Of true positive donors, 90.9 % of donors reported engaging in high risk sexual behaviours.

Conclusion: There is a need to update syphilis screening guidelines in developing countries like India, incorporating combination testing to improve the accuracy of syphilis detection in blood donors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
献血者梅毒血清反应的趋势:一家三级医院17年的回顾性分析和随访。
背景与目的:本研究旨在评估献血者中梅毒的血清阳性率,评价血清反应阳性献血者的反应率,调查高危行为。材料和方法:本研究对献血者的梅毒血清反应性进行了回顾性分析,历时17年。献血者使用快速血浆反应素(RPR)卡试验筛查梅毒。丢弃有rpr反应的血液单位,并通知献血者进行随访。获得了详细的病史,包括先前的梅毒诊断、性行为和潜在的高危活动。反复出现RPR反应的献血者转诊接受进一步的确认性治疗。结果:569例献血者(0.20 %)出现RPR反应。RPR反应性与研究时间、供者年龄、供者状态呈非线性关系。结论:印度等发展中国家需要更新梅毒筛查指南,纳入联合检测,以提高献血者梅毒检测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues. Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.
期刊最新文献
Alemtuzumab and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Analysis of an international surveillance database and systematic literature review. Pilot evaluation of LR EXT sets of the Reveos automated blood processing system. UV immunothrombotic trombocytopenic purpura. Weak or partial D: Importance of molecular characterization of D variants. Trends in syphilis seroreactivity among blood donors: A 17-year retrospective analysis and follow-up at a tertiary care hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1