{"title":"Trends in syphilis seroreactivity among blood donors: A 17-year retrospective analysis and follow-up at a tertiary care hospital.","authors":"Kshitija Mittal, Paramjit Kaur, Ravneet Kaur, Gagandeep Kaur, Arpita Parmar, Shivangi Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2025.104068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the seroprevalence of syphilis among blood donors, evaluate the response rate of seroreactive donors, and investigate high-risk behaviors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study presents a retrospective analysis of syphilis seroreactivity among blood donors over a 17 year period. Blood donations were screened for syphilis using the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) card test. RPR-reactive blood units were discarded, and donors were notified for follow-up. A detailed history was obtained, including prior syphilis diagnoses, sexual practices, and potential high-risk activities. The donors who were repeatedly RPR reactive were referred for further confirmatory management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 569 (0.20 %) donors were found RPR reactive. A non-linear trend was observed between RPR reactivity and study period, donor age and donation status. RPR reactivity was significantly higher in repeat blood donors (p < 0.001). The mean donor return rate was significantly higher following introduction of phone calls along with letters for donor notification compared to notification via letters only (p < 0.001). Forty-five percent (n = 241) donors returned for repeat sample testing. Of these, 19 % (n = 45) tested negative on repeat RPR testing while 81.3 % (n = 196) remained RPR reactive and were referred for further management. On follow up of the latter group, 43.9 % (n = 86) donors were negative on confirmatory testing indicating biological false positives while 56.1 % (n = 110) donors were positive on confirmatory testing and were true positives. Of true positive donors, 90.9 % of donors reported engaging in high risk sexual behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need to update syphilis screening guidelines in developing countries like India, incorporating combination testing to improve the accuracy of syphilis detection in blood donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"64 2","pages":"104068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2025.104068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: This study aimed to assess the seroprevalence of syphilis among blood donors, evaluate the response rate of seroreactive donors, and investigate high-risk behaviors.
Material and methods: The study presents a retrospective analysis of syphilis seroreactivity among blood donors over a 17 year period. Blood donations were screened for syphilis using the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) card test. RPR-reactive blood units were discarded, and donors were notified for follow-up. A detailed history was obtained, including prior syphilis diagnoses, sexual practices, and potential high-risk activities. The donors who were repeatedly RPR reactive were referred for further confirmatory management.
Results: A total of 569 (0.20 %) donors were found RPR reactive. A non-linear trend was observed between RPR reactivity and study period, donor age and donation status. RPR reactivity was significantly higher in repeat blood donors (p < 0.001). The mean donor return rate was significantly higher following introduction of phone calls along with letters for donor notification compared to notification via letters only (p < 0.001). Forty-five percent (n = 241) donors returned for repeat sample testing. Of these, 19 % (n = 45) tested negative on repeat RPR testing while 81.3 % (n = 196) remained RPR reactive and were referred for further management. On follow up of the latter group, 43.9 % (n = 86) donors were negative on confirmatory testing indicating biological false positives while 56.1 % (n = 110) donors were positive on confirmatory testing and were true positives. Of true positive donors, 90.9 % of donors reported engaging in high risk sexual behaviours.
Conclusion: There is a need to update syphilis screening guidelines in developing countries like India, incorporating combination testing to improve the accuracy of syphilis detection in blood donors.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues.
Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.