Endoscopic and imaging evaluations of the primary tumor response in patients with proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy.
Yuegang Li, Chengcheng Han, Yao Cheng, Gang Hu, Meng Zhuang, Xishan Wang, Jianqiang Tang
{"title":"Endoscopic and imaging evaluations of the primary tumor response in patients with proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy.","authors":"Yuegang Li, Chengcheng Han, Yao Cheng, Gang Hu, Meng Zhuang, Xishan Wang, Jianqiang Tang","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03088-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy is a potential treatment option for patients with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Preoperative screening via endoscopy and imaging examinations could help identify patients who may potentially achieve a complete response after neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic and imaging examinations in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, observational study included patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer by biopsy between 2015 and 2023 at a tertiary referral center. The main outcome measures included endoscopic examination, imaging findings, and pathological results after neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 36 patients with locally advanced proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer. Postoperative pathology revealed that 17 patients (47.2%) achieved a complete response (ypT0N0). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the endoscopic ypT0N0 diagnosis were 62.5%, 80.0%, and 80.6%, respectively; those of imaging-based ypT0N0 diagnosis were 43.8%, 100%, and 75.0%, respectively; and those of the combined diagnosis were 37.5%, 100%, and 72.2%, respectively. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for the endoscopic and imaging ypT0N0 diagnoses were 0.768 and 0.706, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The specificities of endoscopy and imaging for diagnosing complete response after neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy for colorectal cancer were high; however, sensitivities were low. Therefore, radical surgery should still be recommended for patients with an incomplete response based on either examination. Larger scale studies are required to determine if a watch-and-wait strategy is suitable for patients with a complete response based on these two examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03088-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy is a potential treatment option for patients with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Preoperative screening via endoscopy and imaging examinations could help identify patients who may potentially achieve a complete response after neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic and imaging examinations in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy.
Methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational study included patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer by biopsy between 2015 and 2023 at a tertiary referral center. The main outcome measures included endoscopic examination, imaging findings, and pathological results after neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy.
Results: This study included 36 patients with locally advanced proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer. Postoperative pathology revealed that 17 patients (47.2%) achieved a complete response (ypT0N0). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the endoscopic ypT0N0 diagnosis were 62.5%, 80.0%, and 80.6%, respectively; those of imaging-based ypT0N0 diagnosis were 43.8%, 100%, and 75.0%, respectively; and those of the combined diagnosis were 37.5%, 100%, and 72.2%, respectively. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for the endoscopic and imaging ypT0N0 diagnoses were 0.768 and 0.706, respectively.
Conclusions: The specificities of endoscopy and imaging for diagnosing complete response after neoadjuvant combination immunotherapy for colorectal cancer were high; however, sensitivities were low. Therefore, radical surgery should still be recommended for patients with an incomplete response based on either examination. Larger scale studies are required to determine if a watch-and-wait strategy is suitable for patients with a complete response based on these two examinations.
期刊介绍:
Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.