Sustained Improvement in Medical Students' Academic Performance in Renal Physiology Through the Application of Flipped Classroom

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1111/tct.70021
Thana Thongsricome, Rahat Longsomboon, Nattacha Srithawatpong, Sarunyapong Atchariyapakorn, Kasiphak Kaikaew, Danai Wangsaturaka
{"title":"Sustained Improvement in Medical Students' Academic Performance in Renal Physiology Through the Application of Flipped Classroom","authors":"Thana Thongsricome,&nbsp;Rahat Longsomboon,&nbsp;Nattacha Srithawatpong,&nbsp;Sarunyapong Atchariyapakorn,&nbsp;Kasiphak Kaikaew,&nbsp;Danai Wangsaturaka","doi":"10.1111/tct.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Teaching renal physiology is problematic in many medical schools since conventional passive learning might not be effective. Active learnings including flipped classroom (FC) have been introduced to medical education including renal physiology topic recently, but no study regarding long-term outcomes has been reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>Two classes of second-year medical students were compared. The former class studied with conventional lecture and the latter class studied with FC. Our FC includes asynchronous instructor-made recorded lectures that students can study according to their pace and available time, followed by synchronous case discussions related to the lecture topic. There were post-test quizzes for all recorded lectures along with the given explanation of the answers after finishing each quiz. Short-term topic understanding and long-term knowledge retention assessed with summative examination and end-of-preclerkship comprehensive examination, respectively, were compared. Attitude towards FC was also assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Students in the FC group performed better in both summative examination (70.1 ± 8.9 vs. 62.8 ± 9.9, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, a total score of 90) and comprehensive examination (6.5 ± 2.2 vs. 5.9 ± 1.8, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, a total score of 11). Most students agreed that FC should be applied despite the increased stress level and that the post-test quizzes were very helpful. Intriguingly, the multivariate analysis showed that male students performed better than female students for both examinations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Well-designed FC is a promising and highly effective method in renal physiology teaching. Cautions for the instructor include students' stress and gender differences in academic performance.</p>\n \n <blockquote>\n <p>Well-designed FC is a promising and highly effective method in renal physiology teaching.</p>\n </blockquote>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Teaching renal physiology is problematic in many medical schools since conventional passive learning might not be effective. Active learnings including flipped classroom (FC) have been introduced to medical education including renal physiology topic recently, but no study regarding long-term outcomes has been reported.

Approach

Two classes of second-year medical students were compared. The former class studied with conventional lecture and the latter class studied with FC. Our FC includes asynchronous instructor-made recorded lectures that students can study according to their pace and available time, followed by synchronous case discussions related to the lecture topic. There were post-test quizzes for all recorded lectures along with the given explanation of the answers after finishing each quiz. Short-term topic understanding and long-term knowledge retention assessed with summative examination and end-of-preclerkship comprehensive examination, respectively, were compared. Attitude towards FC was also assessed.

Evaluation

Students in the FC group performed better in both summative examination (70.1 ± 8.9 vs. 62.8 ± 9.9, p < 0.001, a total score of 90) and comprehensive examination (6.5 ± 2.2 vs. 5.9 ± 1.8, p < 0.001, a total score of 11). Most students agreed that FC should be applied despite the increased stress level and that the post-test quizzes were very helpful. Intriguingly, the multivariate analysis showed that male students performed better than female students for both examinations.

Implications

Well-designed FC is a promising and highly effective method in renal physiology teaching. Cautions for the instructor include students' stress and gender differences in academic performance.

Well-designed FC is a promising and highly effective method in renal physiology teaching.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用翻转课堂对医学生肾脏生理学学习成绩的持续改善。
背景:肾脏生理学教学在许多医学院存在问题,因为传统的被动学习可能效果不佳。近年来,包括翻转课堂(FC)在内的主动学习已被引入肾脏生理学等医学教育,但尚未有关于长期效果的研究报道。方法:对两班医二学生进行比较。前一个班采用常规课堂学习,后一个班采用FC学习。我们的FC包括异步讲师录制的讲座,学生可以根据自己的进度和可用时间学习,然后是与讲座主题相关的同步案例讨论。所有录制的讲座都有测试后的小测验,并在完成每个小测验后给出答案的解释。分别用总结性考试和职前综合考试评估短期主题理解能力和长期知识保留能力。对FC的态度也进行了评估。评价:FC组学生在两项总结性检查中均表现较好(70.1±8.9 vs. 62.8±9.9,p)。意义:设计良好的FC是一种有前景且高效的肾脏生理学教学方法。对教师的警告包括学生的压力和学业成绩的性别差异。设计合理的FC是肾脏生理学教学中行之有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
期刊最新文献
How to … Co-Create Research With Medical Students Investigating TikTok Trends in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Comprehensive Descriptive Analysis TCT Referee Recognition 2024 Navigating Crossroads: Collaborative Strategies to Assess and Enhance the Quality of Clinical Learning Environments How to Harness Education Fellows to Optimise Clinical Placement Capacity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1