Gait during community ambulation and laboratory-based walking in people with mild traumatic brain injury

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.002
Prokopios Antonellis , Jae W. Lee , Peter C. Fino , Margaret M. Weightman , Siting Chen , Margaret E. Stojak , Mark E. Lester , Carrie W. Hoppes , Leland E. Dibble , Laurie A. King
{"title":"Gait during community ambulation and laboratory-based walking in people with mild traumatic brain injury","authors":"Prokopios Antonellis ,&nbsp;Jae W. Lee ,&nbsp;Peter C. Fino ,&nbsp;Margaret M. Weightman ,&nbsp;Siting Chen ,&nbsp;Margaret E. Stojak ,&nbsp;Mark E. Lester ,&nbsp;Carrie W. Hoppes ,&nbsp;Leland E. Dibble ,&nbsp;Laurie A. King","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gait impairments are common in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), presenting in the acute phase and often persisting in subtle ways over time. Despite the prominence of laboratory gait evaluations, a comprehensive understanding of gait deficits post-mTBI necessitates the examination of various gait domains in real-world environments. Assessing gait during a community ambulation task (CAT) may capture real-world challenges and influence focused interventions or rehabilitation in individuals with mTBI.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>The aim of the study was to compare gait performance across independent gait domains in individuals with and without mTBI using wearable sensors during both the CAT and laboratory tasks (i.e., 1-minute walk test). Additionally, associations between the CAT and single- and dual-task walking were investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this cross-sectional study, 107 participants, including individuals with mTBI (n = 52) and healthy controls (n = 55), underwent gait assessments during the CAT and 1-minute walk tests (single- and dual-task) using wearable sensors. Four independent gait domains (i.e., gait variability, pace, rhythm, and turning), consisting of thirteen gait variables, were analyzed. Statistical methods included t-tests and partial correlations, adjusted for covariates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals with mTBI exhibited gait deficits across multiple gait domains. Specifically, increased gait variability, decreased gait pace and turns post mTBI were seen in the CAT and 1-minute walk tests. Notably, the CAT task exhibited greater gait differences in terms of gait variability and pace compared to the laboratory tasks. Across gait domains, the CAT revealed greater number of correlated measures with dual-task walking compared to single-task walking.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The community ambulation walking task showed more abnormalities across gait domains compared to laboratory walking tests, highlighting the potential importance of incorporating real-life, community ambulatory tasks into post-mTBI evaluation of mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"117 ","pages":"Pages 254-260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225000025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gait impairments are common in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), presenting in the acute phase and often persisting in subtle ways over time. Despite the prominence of laboratory gait evaluations, a comprehensive understanding of gait deficits post-mTBI necessitates the examination of various gait domains in real-world environments. Assessing gait during a community ambulation task (CAT) may capture real-world challenges and influence focused interventions or rehabilitation in individuals with mTBI.

Research Question

The aim of the study was to compare gait performance across independent gait domains in individuals with and without mTBI using wearable sensors during both the CAT and laboratory tasks (i.e., 1-minute walk test). Additionally, associations between the CAT and single- and dual-task walking were investigated.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 107 participants, including individuals with mTBI (n = 52) and healthy controls (n = 55), underwent gait assessments during the CAT and 1-minute walk tests (single- and dual-task) using wearable sensors. Four independent gait domains (i.e., gait variability, pace, rhythm, and turning), consisting of thirteen gait variables, were analyzed. Statistical methods included t-tests and partial correlations, adjusted for covariates.

Results

Individuals with mTBI exhibited gait deficits across multiple gait domains. Specifically, increased gait variability, decreased gait pace and turns post mTBI were seen in the CAT and 1-minute walk tests. Notably, the CAT task exhibited greater gait differences in terms of gait variability and pace compared to the laboratory tasks. Across gait domains, the CAT revealed greater number of correlated measures with dual-task walking compared to single-task walking.

Significance

The community ambulation walking task showed more abnormalities across gait domains compared to laboratory walking tests, highlighting the potential importance of incorporating real-life, community ambulatory tasks into post-mTBI evaluation of mobility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度创伤性脑损伤患者社区行走和实验室行走时的步态。
背景:步态障碍在轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者中很常见,表现为急性期,并经常以微妙的方式持续一段时间。尽管实验室步态评估很重要,但要全面了解mtbi后的步态缺陷,需要在现实环境中检查各种步态域。评估社区行走任务(CAT)期间的步态可能会捕捉到现实世界的挑战,并影响mTBI患者的重点干预或康复。研究问题:该研究的目的是在CAT和实验室任务(即1分钟步行测试)中,使用可穿戴传感器比较有和没有mTBI的个体在独立步态域的步态表现。此外,还研究了CAT与单任务和双任务行走之间的关系。方法:在这项横断面研究中,107名参与者,包括mTBI患者(n = 52)和健康对照者(n = 55),在CAT和1分钟步行测试(单任务和双任务)期间使用可穿戴传感器进行步态评估。分析了由13个步态变量组成的4个独立的步态域(即步态变异性、步伐、节奏和转身)。统计方法包括t检验和部分相关性,并根据协变量进行调整。结果:mTBI患者表现出多个步态域的步态缺陷。具体来说,在CAT和1分钟步行测试中,可以看到mTBI后步态变异性增加,步态速度和转弯次数减少。值得注意的是,与实验室任务相比,CAT任务在步态变异性和速度方面表现出更大的步态差异。在整个步态域,CAT揭示了与单任务行走相比,双任务行走有更多的相关测量。意义:与实验室步行测试相比,社区步行任务显示出更多的步态域异常,突出了将现实生活中的社区步行任务纳入mtbi后活动能力评估的潜在重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Validation of an algorithm for detecting turning in people with cognitive impairment, considering dementia disease subtype Impact of mild leg length discrepancy on pelvic alignment and gait compensation in children Fully instrumented gait analysis in rare bone diseases – A scoping review of the literature Effects of external ankle braces on kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during the cutting maneuver in healthy females The effects of Hyperkyphosis on Balance and Fall Risk in older adults: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1