Validation of an algorithm for detecting turning in people with cognitive impairment, considering dementia disease subtype

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.011
Ríona Mc Ardle , Leigh J. Ryan , Rana Zia Ur Rehman , Emily Dignan , Abbie Thompson , Silvia Del Din , Brook Galna , Alan J Thomas , Lynn Rochester , Lisa Alcock
{"title":"Validation of an algorithm for detecting turning in people with cognitive impairment, considering dementia disease subtype","authors":"Ríona Mc Ardle ,&nbsp;Leigh J. Ryan ,&nbsp;Rana Zia Ur Rehman ,&nbsp;Emily Dignan ,&nbsp;Abbie Thompson ,&nbsp;Silvia Del Din ,&nbsp;Brook Galna ,&nbsp;Alan J Thomas ,&nbsp;Lynn Rochester ,&nbsp;Lisa Alcock","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Turning manoeuvres are an essential component of mobility and are vital for effective real-world navigation. Turning is more challenging than straight-line walking, involving complex cognitive functions to execute multi-segment co-ordination. Therefore, people with cognitive impairment (PwCI) may be more susceptible to impaired turning performance. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to quantify turning performance; however, IMU-based algorithms have not yet been validated for PwCI, or across dementia disease subtypes.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Is a custom-built algorithm for accurately detecting turn start and end valid for use in PwCI and in different dementia disease subtypes?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty-six PwCI due to Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease and vascular dementia, along with 23 cognitively healthy older adults (controls) were included. Participants wore an IMU on their lower back while completing six 10-m intermittent walks, segmented by 180° turns. A 2D colour video camera was used as the reference system. Videos were reviewed by two independent blinded raters annotating turn start and end. Agreement (intra-class correlation (ICC (2,1)), Spearman’s rho and Limits of agreement) and error (Root mean square error; RMSE and bias) between the raters (rater 1 vs. 2) and the algorithm (rater vs. algorithm) were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was excellent agreement (rater-rater and rater-algorithm) for detecting turn start and end for PwCI and across dementia disease subtypes (rho = 1.00, ICC = 1.00). The error between raters was lower (RMSE &lt; 0.72 s, bias &lt; 0.41 s) than the error between raters and algorithm (RMSE &lt; 1.29 s, bias &lt; 1.4 s). Error was lowest for controls (RMSE &lt; 0.94 s), followed by AD (RMSE &lt; 1.21 s) and LBD (RMSE &lt; 1.29 s).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Key findings suggest that this algorithm can detect turn start and end using an IMU in PwCI in agreement with a reference system (video ratings). Future research should consider the clinical application of turning assessment in PwCI, such as its ability to differentiate dementia disease subtypes to support accurate diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"118 ","pages":"Pages 141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225001018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Turning manoeuvres are an essential component of mobility and are vital for effective real-world navigation. Turning is more challenging than straight-line walking, involving complex cognitive functions to execute multi-segment co-ordination. Therefore, people with cognitive impairment (PwCI) may be more susceptible to impaired turning performance. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to quantify turning performance; however, IMU-based algorithms have not yet been validated for PwCI, or across dementia disease subtypes.

Research question

Is a custom-built algorithm for accurately detecting turn start and end valid for use in PwCI and in different dementia disease subtypes?

Methods

Sixty-six PwCI due to Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease and vascular dementia, along with 23 cognitively healthy older adults (controls) were included. Participants wore an IMU on their lower back while completing six 10-m intermittent walks, segmented by 180° turns. A 2D colour video camera was used as the reference system. Videos were reviewed by two independent blinded raters annotating turn start and end. Agreement (intra-class correlation (ICC (2,1)), Spearman’s rho and Limits of agreement) and error (Root mean square error; RMSE and bias) between the raters (rater 1 vs. 2) and the algorithm (rater vs. algorithm) were evaluated.

Results

There was excellent agreement (rater-rater and rater-algorithm) for detecting turn start and end for PwCI and across dementia disease subtypes (rho = 1.00, ICC = 1.00). The error between raters was lower (RMSE < 0.72 s, bias < 0.41 s) than the error between raters and algorithm (RMSE < 1.29 s, bias < 1.4 s). Error was lowest for controls (RMSE < 0.94 s), followed by AD (RMSE < 1.21 s) and LBD (RMSE < 1.29 s).

Significance

Key findings suggest that this algorithm can detect turn start and end using an IMU in PwCI in agreement with a reference system (video ratings). Future research should consider the clinical application of turning assessment in PwCI, such as its ability to differentiate dementia disease subtypes to support accurate diagnosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑到痴呆症亚型,一种检测认知障碍患者转向的算法的验证
转弯操作是机动性的重要组成部分,对于有效的现实世界导航至关重要。转弯比直线行走更具挑战性,涉及复杂的认知功能来执行多段协调。因此,认知障碍(PwCI)患者可能更容易受到转向性能受损的影响。惯性测量单元(imu)可用于量化转向性能;然而,基于imu的算法尚未在PwCI或痴呆症亚型中得到验证。研究问题:用于准确检测转弯开始和结束的定制算法是否适用于PwCI和不同痴呆病亚型?方法纳入66例阿尔茨海默病、路易体病和血管性痴呆的PwCI患者和23例认知健康老年人(对照组)。参与者在下背部佩戴IMU,完成6次10米的间歇行走,以180度转弯为间隔。采用二维彩色摄像机作为参照系。视频由两名独立的盲法评分者对转弯的开始和结束进行评注。一致性(类内相关性(ICC(2,1))、Spearman 's rho和一致性限)和误差(均方根误差;评估评分者(评分者1 vs. 2)和算法(评分者vs.算法)之间的均方根误差和偏差。结果在PwCI和不同痴呆病亚型中,检测转弯开始和结束有很好的一致性(rho = 1.00, ICC = 1.00) (rater-rater和rater-algorithm)。评分者之间的误差较低(RMSE <;0.72 s,偏差<;0.41 s)比评分者与算法之间的误差(RMSE <;1.29 s, bias <;1.4 年代)。对照组的错误率最低(RMSE <;0.94 s),其次是AD (RMSE <;1.21 s)和LBD (RMSE <;1.29 年代)。关键研究结果表明,该算法可以使用与参考系统(视频收视率)一致的PwCI中的IMU来检测转弯的开始和结束。未来的研究应考虑转弯评估在PwCI中的临床应用,如其区分痴呆疾病亚型的能力,以支持准确的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Multiplanar kinematic deviations in idiopathic toe walking: A comparison with voluntary toe walking gait Foreknowledge of postural demands of an upcoming step modulates rapid stepping behaviour The immediate effect of lateral wedging on first metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics and centre of pressure Post-error slowing of balance recovery steps when inhibition is required Intra- and inter-therapist reliability of lower-limb inter-joint coordination during gait in individuals with and without cerebral palsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1