Ríona Mc Ardle , Leigh J. Ryan , Rana Zia Ur Rehman , Emily Dignan , Abbie Thompson , Silvia Del Din , Brook Galna , Alan J Thomas , Lynn Rochester , Lisa Alcock
{"title":"Validation of an algorithm for detecting turning in people with cognitive impairment, considering dementia disease subtype","authors":"Ríona Mc Ardle , Leigh J. Ryan , Rana Zia Ur Rehman , Emily Dignan , Abbie Thompson , Silvia Del Din , Brook Galna , Alan J Thomas , Lynn Rochester , Lisa Alcock","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Turning manoeuvres are an essential component of mobility and are vital for effective real-world navigation. Turning is more challenging than straight-line walking, involving complex cognitive functions to execute multi-segment co-ordination. Therefore, people with cognitive impairment (PwCI) may be more susceptible to impaired turning performance. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to quantify turning performance; however, IMU-based algorithms have not yet been validated for PwCI, or across dementia disease subtypes.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Is a custom-built algorithm for accurately detecting turn start and end valid for use in PwCI and in different dementia disease subtypes?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty-six PwCI due to Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease and vascular dementia, along with 23 cognitively healthy older adults (controls) were included. Participants wore an IMU on their lower back while completing six 10-m intermittent walks, segmented by 180° turns. A 2D colour video camera was used as the reference system. Videos were reviewed by two independent blinded raters annotating turn start and end. Agreement (intra-class correlation (ICC (2,1)), Spearman’s rho and Limits of agreement) and error (Root mean square error; RMSE and bias) between the raters (rater 1 vs. 2) and the algorithm (rater vs. algorithm) were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was excellent agreement (rater-rater and rater-algorithm) for detecting turn start and end for PwCI and across dementia disease subtypes (rho = 1.00, ICC = 1.00). The error between raters was lower (RMSE < 0.72 s, bias < 0.41 s) than the error between raters and algorithm (RMSE < 1.29 s, bias < 1.4 s). Error was lowest for controls (RMSE < 0.94 s), followed by AD (RMSE < 1.21 s) and LBD (RMSE < 1.29 s).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Key findings suggest that this algorithm can detect turn start and end using an IMU in PwCI in agreement with a reference system (video ratings). Future research should consider the clinical application of turning assessment in PwCI, such as its ability to differentiate dementia disease subtypes to support accurate diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"118 ","pages":"Pages 141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225001018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Turning manoeuvres are an essential component of mobility and are vital for effective real-world navigation. Turning is more challenging than straight-line walking, involving complex cognitive functions to execute multi-segment co-ordination. Therefore, people with cognitive impairment (PwCI) may be more susceptible to impaired turning performance. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to quantify turning performance; however, IMU-based algorithms have not yet been validated for PwCI, or across dementia disease subtypes.
Research question
Is a custom-built algorithm for accurately detecting turn start and end valid for use in PwCI and in different dementia disease subtypes?
Methods
Sixty-six PwCI due to Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease and vascular dementia, along with 23 cognitively healthy older adults (controls) were included. Participants wore an IMU on their lower back while completing six 10-m intermittent walks, segmented by 180° turns. A 2D colour video camera was used as the reference system. Videos were reviewed by two independent blinded raters annotating turn start and end. Agreement (intra-class correlation (ICC (2,1)), Spearman’s rho and Limits of agreement) and error (Root mean square error; RMSE and bias) between the raters (rater 1 vs. 2) and the algorithm (rater vs. algorithm) were evaluated.
Results
There was excellent agreement (rater-rater and rater-algorithm) for detecting turn start and end for PwCI and across dementia disease subtypes (rho = 1.00, ICC = 1.00). The error between raters was lower (RMSE < 0.72 s, bias < 0.41 s) than the error between raters and algorithm (RMSE < 1.29 s, bias < 1.4 s). Error was lowest for controls (RMSE < 0.94 s), followed by AD (RMSE < 1.21 s) and LBD (RMSE < 1.29 s).
Significance
Key findings suggest that this algorithm can detect turn start and end using an IMU in PwCI in agreement with a reference system (video ratings). Future research should consider the clinical application of turning assessment in PwCI, such as its ability to differentiate dementia disease subtypes to support accurate diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.