Hybrid care model: Combining telemedicine and office visits for diabetes management in older adults with type 1 diabetes.

Medical research archives Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.18103/mra.v12i9.5728
Elena Toschi, Atif Adam, Nana Frimpong, Rebecca Hurlbert, Christine Slyne, Lori Laffel, Medha Munshi
{"title":"Hybrid care model: Combining telemedicine and office visits for diabetes management in older adults with type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Elena Toschi, Atif Adam, Nana Frimpong, Rebecca Hurlbert, Christine Slyne, Lori Laffel, Medha Munshi","doi":"10.18103/mra.v12i9.5728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the use of hybrid (telehealth and in-person) care on visitation and glycaemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we examined clinical characteristics, number of visits (telehealth and in-person) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics for older adults (≥65 years) with T1D from electronic health records during the pre-COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2019-March 1, 2020; in-person) and pandemic (September 1, 2020-August 31, 2021; hybrid) periods. Main outcomes were the number of visits and changes in glycaemic control (HbA1c), and in a sub-group of older adults using CGM, changes in CGM metrics between in-person and hybrid care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analysed data of 661 older adults with T1D (age 72±5 years). The hybrid care resulted in an increased number of annual diabetes visits (6.3 vs 4.2 visits/person) without change in glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.4% vs 7.2%) compared with in-person care alone. In the sub-group of 299 older adults with T1D using CGM, hybrid care compared with in-person care resulted in an improvement of time-in-range (70-180 mg/dL) (68% to 71%; p<0.001) without increasing hypoglycaemia (<70 mg/dL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with in-person only visits, hybrid care maintained visit frequency and preserved glycaemic control measured as HbA1c. In a sub-group of older adults with T1D using CGM, time-in-range improved while time in hypoglycaemia did not change. These data suggest that a hybrid care model is efficacious in maintaining visitation and glycaemic control, and, as demonstrated in a sub-group of older adults with T1D using CGM, safe with respect to time in hypoglycaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94137,"journal":{"name":"Medical research archives","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical research archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i9.5728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the use of hybrid (telehealth and in-person) care on visitation and glycaemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: In this retrospective study, we examined clinical characteristics, number of visits (telehealth and in-person) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics for older adults (≥65 years) with T1D from electronic health records during the pre-COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2019-March 1, 2020; in-person) and pandemic (September 1, 2020-August 31, 2021; hybrid) periods. Main outcomes were the number of visits and changes in glycaemic control (HbA1c), and in a sub-group of older adults using CGM, changes in CGM metrics between in-person and hybrid care.

Results: We analysed data of 661 older adults with T1D (age 72±5 years). The hybrid care resulted in an increased number of annual diabetes visits (6.3 vs 4.2 visits/person) without change in glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.4% vs 7.2%) compared with in-person care alone. In the sub-group of 299 older adults with T1D using CGM, hybrid care compared with in-person care resulted in an improvement of time-in-range (70-180 mg/dL) (68% to 71%; p<0.001) without increasing hypoglycaemia (<70 mg/dL).

Conclusion: Compared with in-person only visits, hybrid care maintained visit frequency and preserved glycaemic control measured as HbA1c. In a sub-group of older adults with T1D using CGM, time-in-range improved while time in hypoglycaemia did not change. These data suggest that a hybrid care model is efficacious in maintaining visitation and glycaemic control, and, as demonstrated in a sub-group of older adults with T1D using CGM, safe with respect to time in hypoglycaemia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合护理模式:结合远程医疗和办公室就诊对老年1型糖尿病患者的糖尿病管理。
目的:评估在老年1型糖尿病患者(T1D)中使用混合(远程医疗和面对面)护理的探视和血糖情况。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们研究了2019年3月1日至2020年3月1日期间,来自电子健康记录的老年(≥65岁)T1D患者的临床特征、就诊次数(远程医疗和面对面)和连续血糖监测(CGM)指标。面对面)和大流行(2020年9月1日至2021年8月31日;混合)。主要结果是就诊次数和血糖控制(HbA1c)的变化,在使用CGM的老年人亚组中,CGM指标在面对面护理和混合护理之间的变化。结果:我们分析了661例老年T1D患者(年龄72±5岁)的资料。与单独的现场护理相比,混合护理导致每年糖尿病就诊次数增加(6.3次对4.2次/人),而血糖控制没有改变(HbA1c 7.4%对7.2%)。在299名使用CGM的老年T1D患者亚组中,与面对面护理相比,混合护理导致范围内时间(70-180 mg/dL)的改善(68%至71%;结论:与单独就诊相比,混合护理维持了就诊频率,并保留了以HbA1c测量的血糖控制。在使用CGM的老年T1D患者亚组中,范围内时间得到改善,而低血糖时间没有改变。这些数据表明,混合护理模式在维持探视和血糖控制方面是有效的,并且正如在使用CGM的老年T1D患者亚组中所证明的那样,在低血糖时间方面是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Achieving Chronic Care Equity by Leveraging the Telehealth Ecosystem (ACCTIVATE): A Multilevel Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. Cultural Effects on the Performance of Older Haitian Immigrants on Timed Cognitive Tests. Characteristics associated with social anxiety in adults with developmental stuttering: A review. Air Pollution as an Environmental Risk Factor for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias. Hybrid care model: Combining telemedicine and office visits for diabetes management in older adults with type 1 diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1