Norbert Erdélyi, Dóra Gere, Eszter Fekete, Gábor Nyiri, Attila Engloner, Andrea Tóth, Tamás Madarász, Péter Szűcs, Zsuzsanna Ágnes Nagy-Kovács, Tamás Pándics, Márta Vargha
{"title":"Transport model-based method for estimating micropollutant removal efficiency in riverbank filtration","authors":"Norbert Erdélyi, Dóra Gere, Eszter Fekete, Gábor Nyiri, Attila Engloner, Andrea Tóth, Tamás Madarász, Péter Szűcs, Zsuzsanna Ágnes Nagy-Kovács, Tamás Pándics, Márta Vargha","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Riverbank filtration is a cost-effective and efficient method for drinking water production, using the natural filtration capacity of the river gravelbed. Removal efficiency for organic micropollutants (OMP) in field studies is generally calculated by comparing the concentrations measured in surface water and in the wells either on the same day or with a shift of fixed time interval, neither of which can account for the variability of surface water quality and travel time in the aquifer. The present study proposes a novel method based on travel time distribution determined by a numerical transport model with a hypothesis that it will provide more reliable estimate for OMP removal. The model was developed for two production sites of Budapest Waterworks, Hungary on Danube River. River water and riverbank filtered well water were sampled regularly for one year (158 samples each) and analysed for 41 OMPs (pesticides, pharmaceutical residues and industrial pollutants). Nineteen pollutants were detected in >50% of the well water samples. Median removal rates were 4-97%, while the concentration of five compounds increased in some wells. Removal rates of telmisartan, tramadol, sulfamethoxazole, 4-methyl-benzotriazole, 5-methyl-benzotriazole and desethyl-terbuthylazine correlated negatively to redox potential (|r|=0.456-0.805). Median travel time increased after high flow events resulting in reduced removal of telmisartan, tramadol, 4-methyl-benzotriazole and desethyl-terbuthylazine (|r|= 0.435-0.661). Removal of diatrizoate, iopamidol, tramadol and benzotriazole increased with distance from the shore (148 vs 395 m) by 25%, 28%, 8%, 16%, respectively. Background groundwater contamination increased pesticide concentration in the wells located in agricultural areas 1.5-5-fold compared to river water. The model-based method gave more consistent results compared to traditional calculations for OMP removal efficiency during the sampling campaign and allowed for estimating the impact of various environmental factors.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123194","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Riverbank filtration is a cost-effective and efficient method for drinking water production, using the natural filtration capacity of the river gravelbed. Removal efficiency for organic micropollutants (OMP) in field studies is generally calculated by comparing the concentrations measured in surface water and in the wells either on the same day or with a shift of fixed time interval, neither of which can account for the variability of surface water quality and travel time in the aquifer. The present study proposes a novel method based on travel time distribution determined by a numerical transport model with a hypothesis that it will provide more reliable estimate for OMP removal. The model was developed for two production sites of Budapest Waterworks, Hungary on Danube River. River water and riverbank filtered well water were sampled regularly for one year (158 samples each) and analysed for 41 OMPs (pesticides, pharmaceutical residues and industrial pollutants). Nineteen pollutants were detected in >50% of the well water samples. Median removal rates were 4-97%, while the concentration of five compounds increased in some wells. Removal rates of telmisartan, tramadol, sulfamethoxazole, 4-methyl-benzotriazole, 5-methyl-benzotriazole and desethyl-terbuthylazine correlated negatively to redox potential (|r|=0.456-0.805). Median travel time increased after high flow events resulting in reduced removal of telmisartan, tramadol, 4-methyl-benzotriazole and desethyl-terbuthylazine (|r|= 0.435-0.661). Removal of diatrizoate, iopamidol, tramadol and benzotriazole increased with distance from the shore (148 vs 395 m) by 25%, 28%, 8%, 16%, respectively. Background groundwater contamination increased pesticide concentration in the wells located in agricultural areas 1.5-5-fold compared to river water. The model-based method gave more consistent results compared to traditional calculations for OMP removal efficiency during the sampling campaign and allowed for estimating the impact of various environmental factors.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.