Emily Drzymalla, Laura Raffield, Katherine Kolor, Alain Koyama, Ramal Moonesinghe, Meda E. Pavkov, Cassandra N. Spracklen, Muin J. Khoury
{"title":"Additive Value of Polygenic Risk Score to Family History for Type 2 Diabetes Prediction: Results From the All of Us Research Database","authors":"Emily Drzymalla, Laura Raffield, Katherine Kolor, Alain Koyama, Ramal Moonesinghe, Meda E. Pavkov, Cassandra N. Spracklen, Muin J. Khoury","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess the additive value of considering type 2 diabetes (T2D) polygenic risk score (PRS) in addition to family history for T2D prediction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data were obtained from the All of Us (AoU) research database. First-degree T2D family history was self-reported on the personal family history health questionnaire. A PRS was constructed from 1,289 variants identified from a large multiancestry genome-wide association study meta-analysis for T2D. Logistic regression models were run to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for T2D. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS A total of 109,958 AoU research participants were included in the analysis. The odds of T2D increased with 1 SD PRS (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.71–1.79) and positive T2D family history (OR 2.32; 95% CI 2.20–2.43). In the joint model, both 1 SD PRS (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.65–1.72) and family history (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.98–2.15) were significantly associated with T2D, although the ORs were slightly attenuated. Predictive models that included both the PRS and family history (area under the curve [AUC] 0.794) performed better than models including only family history (AUC 0.763) or the PRS (AUC 0.785). CONCLUSIONS In predicting T2D, inclusion of a T2D PRS in addition to family history of T2D (first-degree relatives) added statistical value. Further study is needed to determine whether consideration of both family history and a PRS would be useful for clinical T2D prediction.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess the additive value of considering type 2 diabetes (T2D) polygenic risk score (PRS) in addition to family history for T2D prediction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data were obtained from the All of Us (AoU) research database. First-degree T2D family history was self-reported on the personal family history health questionnaire. A PRS was constructed from 1,289 variants identified from a large multiancestry genome-wide association study meta-analysis for T2D. Logistic regression models were run to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for T2D. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS A total of 109,958 AoU research participants were included in the analysis. The odds of T2D increased with 1 SD PRS (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.71–1.79) and positive T2D family history (OR 2.32; 95% CI 2.20–2.43). In the joint model, both 1 SD PRS (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.65–1.72) and family history (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.98–2.15) were significantly associated with T2D, although the ORs were slightly attenuated. Predictive models that included both the PRS and family history (area under the curve [AUC] 0.794) performed better than models including only family history (AUC 0.763) or the PRS (AUC 0.785). CONCLUSIONS In predicting T2D, inclusion of a T2D PRS in addition to family history of T2D (first-degree relatives) added statistical value. Further study is needed to determine whether consideration of both family history and a PRS would be useful for clinical T2D prediction.
目的:本研究的目的是评估除家族史外考虑2型糖尿病(T2D)多基因风险评分(PRS)对T2D预测的附加价值。研究设计与方法数据来源于All of Us (AoU)研究数据库。在个人家族史健康问卷中自述一级T2D家族史。从一项大型多祖先全基因组关联研究荟萃分析中鉴定出1289个T2D变异,构建了一个PRS。运行逻辑回归模型以生成T2D的优势比(ORs)和95% ci。所有模型都根据年龄、性别和BMI进行了调整。结果共纳入109,958名AoU研究参与者。T2D的几率随着1 SD PRS的增加而增加(OR 1.75;95% CI 1.71-1.79)和T2D家族史阳性(OR 2.32;95% ci 2.20-2.43)。在联合模型中,1 SD PRS (OR 1.69;95% CI 1.65-1.72)和家族史(OR 2.06;95% CI 1.98-2.15)与T2D显著相关,尽管ORs略有减弱。同时包含PRS和家族史(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.794)的预测模型优于仅包含家族史(AUC 0.763)或PRS (AUC 0.785)的模型。结论:在预测T2D时,纳入T2D PRS和T2D家族史(一级亲属)增加了统计价值。需要进一步的研究来确定考虑家族史和PRS是否对临床T2D预测有用。
期刊介绍:
The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes.
Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.