Additive Value of Polygenic Risk Score to Family History for Type 2 Diabetes Prediction: Results From the All of Us Research Database

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.2337/dc24-1537
Emily Drzymalla, Laura Raffield, Katherine Kolor, Alain Koyama, Ramal Moonesinghe, Meda E. Pavkov, Cassandra N. Spracklen, Muin J. Khoury
{"title":"Additive Value of Polygenic Risk Score to Family History for Type 2 Diabetes Prediction: Results From the All of Us Research Database","authors":"Emily Drzymalla, Laura Raffield, Katherine Kolor, Alain Koyama, Ramal Moonesinghe, Meda E. Pavkov, Cassandra N. Spracklen, Muin J. Khoury","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess the additive value of considering type 2 diabetes (T2D) polygenic risk score (PRS) in addition to family history for T2D prediction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data were obtained from the All of Us (AoU) research database. First-degree T2D family history was self-reported on the personal family history health questionnaire. A PRS was constructed from 1,289 variants identified from a large multiancestry genome-wide association study meta-analysis for T2D. Logistic regression models were run to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for T2D. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS A total of 109,958 AoU research participants were included in the analysis. The odds of T2D increased with 1 SD PRS (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.71–1.79) and positive T2D family history (OR 2.32; 95% CI 2.20–2.43). In the joint model, both 1 SD PRS (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.65–1.72) and family history (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.98–2.15) were significantly associated with T2D, although the ORs were slightly attenuated. Predictive models that included both the PRS and family history (area under the curve [AUC] 0.794) performed better than models including only family history (AUC 0.763) or the PRS (AUC 0.785). CONCLUSIONS In predicting T2D, inclusion of a T2D PRS in addition to family history of T2D (first-degree relatives) added statistical value. Further study is needed to determine whether consideration of both family history and a PRS would be useful for clinical T2D prediction.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess the additive value of considering type 2 diabetes (T2D) polygenic risk score (PRS) in addition to family history for T2D prediction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data were obtained from the All of Us (AoU) research database. First-degree T2D family history was self-reported on the personal family history health questionnaire. A PRS was constructed from 1,289 variants identified from a large multiancestry genome-wide association study meta-analysis for T2D. Logistic regression models were run to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for T2D. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS A total of 109,958 AoU research participants were included in the analysis. The odds of T2D increased with 1 SD PRS (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.71–1.79) and positive T2D family history (OR 2.32; 95% CI 2.20–2.43). In the joint model, both 1 SD PRS (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.65–1.72) and family history (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.98–2.15) were significantly associated with T2D, although the ORs were slightly attenuated. Predictive models that included both the PRS and family history (area under the curve [AUC] 0.794) performed better than models including only family history (AUC 0.763) or the PRS (AUC 0.785). CONCLUSIONS In predicting T2D, inclusion of a T2D PRS in addition to family history of T2D (first-degree relatives) added statistical value. Further study is needed to determine whether consideration of both family history and a PRS would be useful for clinical T2D prediction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多基因风险评分对2型糖尿病家族史预测的附加价值:来自All of Us研究数据库的结果
目的:本研究的目的是评估除家族史外考虑2型糖尿病(T2D)多基因风险评分(PRS)对T2D预测的附加价值。研究设计与方法数据来源于All of Us (AoU)研究数据库。在个人家族史健康问卷中自述一级T2D家族史。从一项大型多祖先全基因组关联研究荟萃分析中鉴定出1289个T2D变异,构建了一个PRS。运行逻辑回归模型以生成T2D的优势比(ORs)和95% ci。所有模型都根据年龄、性别和BMI进行了调整。结果共纳入109,958名AoU研究参与者。T2D的几率随着1 SD PRS的增加而增加(OR 1.75;95% CI 1.71-1.79)和T2D家族史阳性(OR 2.32;95% ci 2.20-2.43)。在联合模型中,1 SD PRS (OR 1.69;95% CI 1.65-1.72)和家族史(OR 2.06;95% CI 1.98-2.15)与T2D显著相关,尽管ORs略有减弱。同时包含PRS和家族史(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.794)的预测模型优于仅包含家族史(AUC 0.763)或PRS (AUC 0.785)的模型。结论:在预测T2D时,纳入T2D PRS和T2D家族史(一级亲属)增加了统计价值。需要进一步的研究来确定考虑家族史和PRS是否对临床T2D预测有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Risk After Treatment for Childhood and Young Adult Cancer Additive Value of Polygenic Risk Score to Family History for Type 2 Diabetes Prediction: Results From the All of Us Research Database Lessons Learned From Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes in South Asians: Kelly West Award Lecture 2024 Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Weight Loss, BMI, and Waist Circumference for Patients With Obesity or Overweight: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression of 47 Randomized Controlled Trials Derivation and Validation of D-RISK: An Electronic Health Record–Driven Risk Score to Detect Undiagnosed Dysglycemia in Clinical Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1