Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Weight Loss, BMI, and Waist Circumference for Patients With Obesity or Overweight: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression of 47 Randomized Controlled Trials
Hon Jen Wong, Bryan Sim, Yao Hao Teo, Yao Neng Teo, Mark Y. Chan, Leonard L.L. Yeo, Pei Chia Eng, Benjamin Y.Q. Tan, Naveed Sattar, Mayank Dalakoti, Ching-Hui Sia
{"title":"Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Weight Loss, BMI, and Waist Circumference for Patients With Obesity or Overweight: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression of 47 Randomized Controlled Trials","authors":"Hon Jen Wong, Bryan Sim, Yao Hao Teo, Yao Neng Teo, Mark Y. Chan, Leonard L.L. Yeo, Pei Chia Eng, Benjamin Y.Q. Tan, Naveed Sattar, Mayank Dalakoti, Ching-Hui Sia","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To provide an updated synthesis on effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on weight, BMI, and waist circumference incorporating newer randomized controlled trials (RCTs), particularly in individuals with overweight or obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for RCTs published from inception to 4 October 2024. The search was limited to RCTs evaluating the use of GLP-1 RAs for mean differences from baseline in weight, BMI, and waist circumference in adults with obesity or overweight with or without diabetes. Two independent reviewers performed the literature search and data extraction, resolving disagreements via consensus or third-reviewer consultation. RESULTS Forty-seven RCTs were included, with a combined cohort of 23,244 patients. GLP-1 RAs demonstrated a mean weight reduction of −4.57 kg (95% CI −5.35 to −3.78), mean BMI reduction of −2.07 kg/m2 (95% CI −2.53 to −1.62), and mean waist circumference reduction of −4.55 cm (95% CI −5.72 to −3.38) compared with placebo. This effect was consistent across diabetes status, GLP-1 RA used, and route of administration. The greatest treatment benefit appeared to favor patients who were younger, female, without diabetes, with higher baseline weight and BMI but lower baseline HbA1c, and treated over a longer duration. Limitations include substantial statistical heterogeneity, in part due to broad inclusion criteria. However, this heterogeneity may improve generalizability by reflecting a wide range of study designs and patient populations. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1 RAs demonstrated significant weight, BMI, and waist circumference reduction benefits in this meta-analysis.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1678","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide an updated synthesis on effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on weight, BMI, and waist circumference incorporating newer randomized controlled trials (RCTs), particularly in individuals with overweight or obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for RCTs published from inception to 4 October 2024. The search was limited to RCTs evaluating the use of GLP-1 RAs for mean differences from baseline in weight, BMI, and waist circumference in adults with obesity or overweight with or without diabetes. Two independent reviewers performed the literature search and data extraction, resolving disagreements via consensus or third-reviewer consultation. RESULTS Forty-seven RCTs were included, with a combined cohort of 23,244 patients. GLP-1 RAs demonstrated a mean weight reduction of −4.57 kg (95% CI −5.35 to −3.78), mean BMI reduction of −2.07 kg/m2 (95% CI −2.53 to −1.62), and mean waist circumference reduction of −4.55 cm (95% CI −5.72 to −3.38) compared with placebo. This effect was consistent across diabetes status, GLP-1 RA used, and route of administration. The greatest treatment benefit appeared to favor patients who were younger, female, without diabetes, with higher baseline weight and BMI but lower baseline HbA1c, and treated over a longer duration. Limitations include substantial statistical heterogeneity, in part due to broad inclusion criteria. However, this heterogeneity may improve generalizability by reflecting a wide range of study designs and patient populations. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1 RAs demonstrated significant weight, BMI, and waist circumference reduction benefits in this meta-analysis.
目的:通过最新的随机对照试验(rct),特别是在超重或肥胖人群中,提供胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)对体重、BMI和腰围影响的最新合成。研究设计和方法我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central),检索从成立到2024年10月4日发表的随机对照试验。该研究仅限于评估GLP-1 RAs在肥胖或超重伴或不伴糖尿病的成人中与基线体重、BMI和腰围的平均差异的随机对照试验。两位独立的审稿人进行文献检索和数据提取,通过共识或第三方审稿人咨询来解决分歧。结果纳入47项随机对照试验,共纳入23,244例患者。与安慰剂相比,GLP-1 RAs显示平均体重减轻- 4.57 kg (95% CI - 5.35至- 3.78),平均BMI减少- 2.07 kg/m2 (95% CI - 2.53至- 1.62),平均腰围减少- 4.55 cm (95% CI - 5.72至- 3.38)。这种效果在糖尿病状态、GLP-1 RA的使用和给药途径中是一致的。最大的治疗效果似乎有利于年轻、女性、无糖尿病、基线体重和BMI较高但基线HbA1c较低、治疗时间较长的患者。局限性包括大量的统计异质性,部分原因是由于广泛的纳入标准。然而,这种异质性可以通过反映广泛的研究设计和患者群体来提高通用性。结论:在这项荟萃分析中,GLP-1 RAs显示出显著的体重、BMI和腰围降低益处。
期刊介绍:
The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes.
Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.