A comprehensive survey of scoring functions for protein docking models.

IF 3.3 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS BMC Bioinformatics Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1186/s12859-024-05991-4
Azam Shirali, Vitalii Stebliankin, Ukesh Karki, Jimeng Shi, Prem Chapagain, Giri Narasimhan
{"title":"A comprehensive survey of scoring functions for protein docking models.","authors":"Azam Shirali, Vitalii Stebliankin, Ukesh Karki, Jimeng Shi, Prem Chapagain, Giri Narasimhan","doi":"10.1186/s12859-024-05991-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While protein-protein docking is fundamental to our understanding of how proteins interact, scoring protein-protein complex conformations is a critical component of successful docking programs. Without accurate and efficient scoring functions to differentiate between native and non-native binding complexes, the accuracy of current docking tools cannot be guaranteed. Although many innovative scoring functions have been proposed, a good scoring function for docking remains elusive. Deep learning models offer alternatives to using explicit empirical or mathematical functions for scoring protein-protein complexes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we perform a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art scoring functions by considering the most popular and highly performant approaches, both classical and deep learning-based, for scoring protein-protein complexes. The methods were also compared based on their runtime as it directly impacts their use in large-scale docking applications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of classical and deep learning-based approaches across seven public and popular datasets to aid researchers in understanding the progress made in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":8958,"journal":{"name":"BMC Bioinformatics","volume":"26 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05991-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While protein-protein docking is fundamental to our understanding of how proteins interact, scoring protein-protein complex conformations is a critical component of successful docking programs. Without accurate and efficient scoring functions to differentiate between native and non-native binding complexes, the accuracy of current docking tools cannot be guaranteed. Although many innovative scoring functions have been proposed, a good scoring function for docking remains elusive. Deep learning models offer alternatives to using explicit empirical or mathematical functions for scoring protein-protein complexes.

Results: In this study, we perform a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art scoring functions by considering the most popular and highly performant approaches, both classical and deep learning-based, for scoring protein-protein complexes. The methods were also compared based on their runtime as it directly impacts their use in large-scale docking applications.

Conclusions: We evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of classical and deep learning-based approaches across seven public and popular datasets to aid researchers in understanding the progress made in this field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蛋白质对接模型评分函数综述。
背景:虽然蛋白质-蛋白质对接是我们理解蛋白质相互作用的基础,但蛋白质-蛋白质复合物构象的评分是成功对接计划的关键组成部分。如果没有准确、高效的评分功能来区分原生和非原生结合物,现有对接工具的准确性就无法得到保证。虽然已经提出了许多创新的评分函数,但一个好的对接评分函数仍然是难以捉摸的。深度学习模型提供了使用明确的经验或数学函数来评分蛋白质-蛋白质复合物的替代方案。结果:在本研究中,我们通过考虑最流行和高性能的方法(包括经典方法和基于深度学习的方法)对蛋白质-蛋白质复合物进行评分,对最先进的评分函数进行了全面调查。我们还比较了这些方法的运行时间,因为这直接影响了它们在大规模对接应用中的使用。结论:我们通过七个公共和流行的数据集评估了经典和基于深度学习的方法的优缺点,以帮助研究人员了解该领域的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Bioinformatics
BMC Bioinformatics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Bioinformatics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the development, testing and novel application of computational and statistical methods for the modeling and analysis of all kinds of biological data, as well as other areas of computational biology. BMC Bioinformatics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
期刊最新文献
scZiva: imputation method for single-cell RNA-seq data with zero-inflated variational autoencoder. Mke-resnet: a lightweight and interpretable deep learning framework for efficient RNA m6A site identification. SPICEY: an R package for quantifying tissue specificity from single cell multi-omics data. DAESC + : high-performance, integrated software for single-cell allele-specific expression data. BKDRP: a biological knowledge-driven approach for drug response prediction using multi-omics data in cancer cell lines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1