Comparison of external calibration and isotope dilution methods for iodine determination in foods by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

IF 8.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Food Chemistry: X Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.fochx.2024.102119
Juntima Photi , Premmin Srisakda , Tiyanun Jurkvon , Christophe Zeder , Kunchit Judprasong
{"title":"Comparison of external calibration and isotope dilution methods for iodine determination in foods by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry","authors":"Juntima Photi ,&nbsp;Premmin Srisakda ,&nbsp;Tiyanun Jurkvon ,&nbsp;Christophe Zeder ,&nbsp;Kunchit Judprasong","doi":"10.1016/j.fochx.2024.102119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study sought to validate the external calibration curve (CAL) method for iodine analysis in 26 selected foods and then to compare the test result with the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). Iodine was extracted by tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) and determined by ICP-MS using CAL and IDMS methods. The results showed that iodine determination using the IDMS method had higher precision than the CAL method (LOD of the method were 0.01 and 0.02 mg/kg, respectively). However, both methods showed good accuracy and precision for all SRM and the 26 food samples. Test results from both methods had a strong correlation (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.998) and no significant difference between the determination methods, even within test sample sectors based on the distribution in the AOAC food triangle (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.970). <sup>129</sup>I spiked into the sample before or during alkaline extraction showed no significant difference in the test results (<em>p</em> = 0.989).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12334,"journal":{"name":"Food Chemistry: X","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 102119"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Chemistry: X","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590157524010071","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study sought to validate the external calibration curve (CAL) method for iodine analysis in 26 selected foods and then to compare the test result with the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). Iodine was extracted by tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) and determined by ICP-MS using CAL and IDMS methods. The results showed that iodine determination using the IDMS method had higher precision than the CAL method (LOD of the method were 0.01 and 0.02 mg/kg, respectively). However, both methods showed good accuracy and precision for all SRM and the 26 food samples. Test results from both methods had a strong correlation (R2 > 0.998) and no significant difference between the determination methods, even within test sample sectors based on the distribution in the AOAC food triangle (p > 0.970). 129I spiked into the sample before or during alkaline extraction showed no significant difference in the test results (p = 0.989).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定食品中碘的外标法和同位素稀释法的比较。
本研究旨在验证外部校准曲线法(CAL)对26种选定食品中碘的分析,并与同位素稀释质谱法(IDMS)的检测结果进行比较。用四甲基氢氧化铵(TMAH)提取碘,用等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)测定碘的含量。结果表明,IDMS法测定碘的精密度高于CAL法(LOD分别为0.01和0.02 mg/kg)。两种方法对所有SRM和26种食品样品均具有较好的准确度和精密度。两种方法的检测结果具有很强的相关性(R2 > 0.998),即使在基于AOAC食品三角分布的测试样本部门内,两种检测方法之间也没有显著差异(p > 0.970)。在碱性提取前和提取过程中加入i对样品的检测结果无显著性差异(p = 0.989)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Chemistry: X
Food Chemistry: X CHEMISTRY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
315
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Food Chemistry: X, one of three Open Access companion journals to Food Chemistry, follows the same aims, scope, and peer-review process. It focuses on papers advancing food and biochemistry or analytical methods, prioritizing research novelty. Manuscript evaluation considers novelty, scientific rigor, field advancement, and reader interest. Excluded are studies on food molecular sciences or disease cure/prevention. Topics include food component chemistry, bioactives, processing effects, additives, contaminants, and analytical methods. The journal welcome Analytical Papers addressing food microbiology, sensory aspects, and more, emphasizing new methods with robust validation and applicability to diverse foods or regions.
期刊最新文献
Impact of ripening on the distribution of jackfruit polyphenol fractions and their inhibitory activities against metabolic enzymes Integrated GC–MS and UPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS untargeted metabolomics for the comprehensive identification of metabolites and characterization of metabolic pathways in key tissues of Cinnamomum cassia From chemical characterization to functional validation: Screening of anti-hyperglycemic components and their action mechanisms in differentially fermented teas Polysaccharides reinforced sesame oil body interface as 3D printing inks for dysphagia food: focusing on structural characteristics and rheological properties Comprehensive evaluation of thermal processing on the edible quality, flavor and starch properties of Chinese yam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1