High-grade liver injury: outcomes with a trauma surgery-liver surgery collaborative approach.

IF 2.2 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001611
Rafael G Ramos-Jimenez, Andrew-Paul Deeb, Evelyn I Truong, David Newhouse, Sowmya Narayanan, Louis Alarcon, Graciela M Bauza, Joshua B Brown, Raquel Forsythe, Christine Leeper, Deepika Mohan, Matthew D Neal, Juan Carlos Puyana, Matthew R Rosengart, Vaishali Dixit Schuchert, Jason L Sperry, Gregory Watson, Brian Zuckerbraun, J Wallis Marsh, Abhinav Humar, David A Geller, Timothy R Billiar, Andrew B Peitzman, Amit D Tevar
{"title":"High-grade liver injury: outcomes with a trauma surgery-liver surgery collaborative approach.","authors":"Rafael G Ramos-Jimenez, Andrew-Paul Deeb, Evelyn I Truong, David Newhouse, Sowmya Narayanan, Louis Alarcon, Graciela M Bauza, Joshua B Brown, Raquel Forsythe, Christine Leeper, Deepika Mohan, Matthew D Neal, Juan Carlos Puyana, Matthew R Rosengart, Vaishali Dixit Schuchert, Jason L Sperry, Gregory Watson, Brian Zuckerbraun, J Wallis Marsh, Abhinav Humar, David A Geller, Timothy R Billiar, Andrew B Peitzman, Amit D Tevar","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Operative mortality for high-grade liver injury (HGLI) remains 42% to 66%, with near-universal mortality after retrohepatic caval injury. The objective of this study was to evaluate mortality and complications of operative and nonoperative management (OM and NOM) of HGLI at our institution, characterized by a trauma surgery-liver surgery collaborative approach to trauma care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational cohort study of adult patients (age ≥16) with HGLI (The American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades IV and V) admitted to an urban level I trauma center from January 2010 to November 2021. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record and state trauma registry. Patients were categorized by management strategy: immediate OM or planned NOM. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our institution treated 179 patients with HGLI (78% blunt, 22% penetrating); 122 grade IV (68%) and 57 grade V (32%) injuries. All abdominal gunshot wounds and 49% of blunt injuries underwent initial OM; 51% of blunt injuries were managed initially by NOM. Procedures at the initial operation included hepatorrhaphy±packing (66.4%), nonanatomic resection (5.6%), segmentectomy (9.3%), and hepatic lobectomy (7.5%). Thirty-day mortality in the OM group was substantially lower than prior reports (23.4%). Operative mortality attributable to the liver injury was 15.7%. 19.4% of patients failed NOM with one death (1.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report an operative mortality of 23.4% for HGLI in a trauma care system characterized by a collaborative approach by trauma surgeons and liver surgeons.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"e001611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Operative mortality for high-grade liver injury (HGLI) remains 42% to 66%, with near-universal mortality after retrohepatic caval injury. The objective of this study was to evaluate mortality and complications of operative and nonoperative management (OM and NOM) of HGLI at our institution, characterized by a trauma surgery-liver surgery collaborative approach to trauma care.

Methods: This was an observational cohort study of adult patients (age ≥16) with HGLI (The American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades IV and V) admitted to an urban level I trauma center from January 2010 to November 2021. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record and state trauma registry. Patients were categorized by management strategy: immediate OM or planned NOM. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

Results: Our institution treated 179 patients with HGLI (78% blunt, 22% penetrating); 122 grade IV (68%) and 57 grade V (32%) injuries. All abdominal gunshot wounds and 49% of blunt injuries underwent initial OM; 51% of blunt injuries were managed initially by NOM. Procedures at the initial operation included hepatorrhaphy±packing (66.4%), nonanatomic resection (5.6%), segmentectomy (9.3%), and hepatic lobectomy (7.5%). Thirty-day mortality in the OM group was substantially lower than prior reports (23.4%). Operative mortality attributable to the liver injury was 15.7%. 19.4% of patients failed NOM with one death (1.4%).

Conclusion: We report an operative mortality of 23.4% for HGLI in a trauma care system characterized by a collaborative approach by trauma surgeons and liver surgeons.

Level of evidence: III.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级别肝损伤:创伤外科-肝外科合作方法的结果。
背景:高级别肝损伤(HGLI)的手术死亡率保持在42%至66%之间,肝后腔静脉损伤后的死亡率几乎普遍存在。本研究的目的是评估我院HGLI手术和非手术治疗(OM和NOM)的死亡率和并发症,其特点是创伤外科-肝外科合作的创伤护理方法。方法:这是一项观察性队列研究,研究对象是2010年1月至2021年11月在城市一级创伤中心住院的HGLI(美国创伤外科协会(AAST)四级和五级)成年患者(年龄≥16岁)。数据来自电子病历和国家创伤登记处。患者按治疗策略进行分类:立即手术或计划手术。主要结局为30天死亡率。结果:我院治疗HGLI患者179例(78%为钝性,22%为穿透性);IV级损伤122例(68%),V级损伤57例(32%)。所有腹部枪伤和49%的钝性伤都有最初的OM;51%的钝性损伤最初采用NOM治疗。初始手术包括肝修补±填塞(66.4%)、非解剖性切除(5.6%)、节段切除术(9.3%)和肝小叶切除术(7.5%)。OM组的30天死亡率明显低于之前的报道(23.4%)。肝损伤的手术死亡率为15.7%。19.4%的患者NOM失败,1例死亡(1.4%)。结论:我们报告在创伤外科医生和肝脏外科医生合作的创伤护理系统中,HGLI的手术死亡率为23.4%。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Integrating advanced practice providers in acute care surgery: considerations, solutions, and fresh perspectives. Navigating the artificial intelligence landscape in trauma, critical care and emergency general surgery: insights from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) 2025 Annual Meeting Panel Discussion. Beyond access: reframing clinical uncertainty in trauma systems. Adipokines and mortality in burns and traumatic brain injury. Mortality following ground-level falls in trauma patients with dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1